GNU bug report logs - #50243
[core-updates-frozen] "multiple definition of..." build failures

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Sarah Morgensen <iskarian <at> mgsn.dev>

Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2021 21:24:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Sarah Morgensen <iskarian <at> mgsn.dev>
Subject: bug#50243: closed (Close)
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2025 15:19:02 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your bug report

#50243: [core-updates-frozen] "multiple definition of..." build failures

which was filed against the guix package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 50243 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
50243: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=50243
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>
To: 50243-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Close
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2025 17:18:03 +0200
Closing this as probably not applicable any more.

Andreas


[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Sarah Morgensen <iskarian <at> mgsn.dev>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: [core-updates-frozen] "multiple definition of..." build failures
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2021 14:23:13 -0700
Hello Guix,

GCC 10 changed the default behavior when encountering multiple
definitions of a global (often an enum) [0].  This causes error messages
like [1]:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
  ld: a.o:(.bss+0x0): multiple definition of `a'; main.o:(.data+0x0): first defined here
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Gentoo's tracker for this issue [2] also has some more info.  I manually
searched Cuirass build logs and found 28 packages failing on x86_64 with
this error:

arcan-sdl <at> 0.5.5.2-1.b4dd1fb
aris <at> 2.2
blastem <at> 0.6.2
chocolate-doom <at> 3.0.1
crispy-doom <at> 5.8.0
geeqie <at> 1.5
glabels <at> 3.4.1
gmtp <at> 1.3.11
gpredict <at> 2.2.1
gtksheet <at> 4.3.5
jumpnbump <at> 1.61
lablgtk <at> 2.18.10
libappindicator <at> 12.10.0
libopenshot <at> 0.2.5
libsrtp <at> 2.3.0
linsmith <at> 0.99.31
megaglest <at> 3.13.0
mupen64plus-core <at> 2.5
ocaml4.07-lablgtk <at> 1.18.10
ocl-icd <at> 2.2.12
opencpn <at> 5.0.0
pcsxr <at> 1.9.95
pipewire <at> 0.2.7
transcode <at> 1.1.7
transmission-remote-gtk <at> 1.4.1
uget <at> 2.2.1
uim-gtk <at> 1.8.8
uim-qt <at> 1.8.8

I submitted an issue upstream for transmission-remote-gtk [3], but I
haven't taken a look at the others.  Any takers?

[0] https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-10/porting_to.html
[1] https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Toolchain/Gcc_10_porting_notes/fno_common
[2] https://bugs.gentoo.org/705764
[3] https://github.com/transmission-remote-gtk/transmission-remote-gtk/issues/122

--
Sarah



This bug report was last modified 6 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.