GNU bug report logs -
#50241
flyspell doesn't work with multiple dictionaries
Previous Next
Full log
Message #44 received at 50241 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> From: Konstantin Kharlamov <hi-angel <at> yandex.ru>
> Cc: 50241 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2021 15:43:30 +0300
>
> > I'm not sure I agree. These are commands that are supposed to be
> > invoked interactively, in the order I've shown, which works. If you
> > want to make this part of your initialization, you need to figure out
> > the required sequence of calls, which you did.
>
> Would you agree if I say that a good user interface means that a function invoked interactively should behave same way when it's invoked non-interactively (barring the fact that it won't show the prompt)?
No, I don't agree. And neither does Emacs: the 'interactive' form is
not necessarily a no-op. As a trivial example, consider:
describe-char is an autoloaded interactive compiled Lisp function in
‘descr-text.el’.
(describe-char POS &optional BUFFER)
Probably introduced at or before Emacs version 22.1.
Describe position POS (interactively, point) and the char after POS.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
As you see, there's some magic happening in interactive invocations
that doesn't happen when you call this function from Lisp.
A less trivial example:
previous-line is an interactive compiled Lisp function in ‘simple.el’.
It is bound to C-p, <up>.
(previous-line &optional ARG TRY-VSCROLL)
This function is for interactive use only;
in Lisp code use `forward-line' with negative argument instead.
Move cursor vertically up ARG lines.
Interactively, vscroll tall lines if ‘auto-window-vscroll’ is enabled.
Non-interactively, use TRY-VSCROLL to control whether to vscroll tall
lines: if either ‘auto-window-vscroll’ or TRY-VSCROLL is nil, this
function will not vscroll.
Again, the behavior in interactive and non-interactive calls is
different.
> So I would say, at least the (ispell-set-spellchecker-params) needs to be added into one of them, so the same order as if they were called interactively would work when they are invoked from a Emacs Lisp file.
Maybe, I need to think about it. But the general principle still
stands: it is okay for interactive and non-interactive invocations to
behave differently. We do it all the time in Emacs.
This bug report was last modified 3 years and 316 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.