GNU bug report logs - #50212
Tests fail while building Guix

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Simon Streit <simon <at> netpanic.org>

Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 13:53:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Simon Streit <simon <at> netpanic.org>
Subject: bug#50212: closed (Re: bug#50212: Several tests fail, Bash fails
 often. Was: Tests fail while building Guix)
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 20:25:03 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your bug report

#50212: Tests fail while building Guix

which was filed against the guix package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 50212 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
50212: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=50212
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
To: Simon Streit <simon <at> netpanic.org>
Cc: 50212-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Maxime Devos <maximedevos <at> telenet.be>
Subject: Re: bug#50212: Several tests fail, Bash fails often. Was: Tests
 fail while building Guix
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 16:24:54 -0400
Hello Simon,

Simon Streit <simon <at> netpanic.org> writes:

> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> writes:
>> I'm guessing the i386 does something bogus?  Your x86_64 is already able
>> to run i386 code natively, AFAIK.
>
> Alright, this was my interpretation from the manual and available
> architectures that I just plugged it all together like that.  I wasn't
> aware that x86_64 can run i386 natively.
>
>> The binfmt service type registers binary formats of non-native
>> architectures with interpreters to run them [0]; this way, when an ARM
>> binary is encountered on a x86_64 system, the kernel Linux knows to
>> launch it via QEMU, for example.  Since commit
>> 77c2f4e2068ebec3f384c826c5a99785125ff72c, this is in effect for any
>> container (it used to be possible to enable it with (guix-support? #t)
>> on only for the container spawned by guix-daemon.
>
> I reenabled the service without it mentioning i386.  Building Guix
> passes as expected.  Thank you.

No worries.  Thank you for the update.

Closing.

Maxim

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Simon Streit <simon <at> netpanic.org>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: Tests fail while building Guix
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 15:45:13 +0200
[Message part 4 (text/plain, inline)]
Hello,

after a time off, I just recently began pulling the latest commits and
have been trying to build Guix since maybe a week.  But several tests
fail.  Even a clean clone fails.

I've only a handful of logs.  It seams that the tests fail mostly for
this reason:

/home/ss2/code/guix/test-tmp/store/9m9mjdz3zl28n1dq094aqsxk5d480mvg-bash: 9m9mjdz3zl28n1dq094aqsxk5d480mvg-bash: No such file or directory

But this executable is there though.

I've attached only a handful of logs.


Cheers
Simon

[challenge.log (application/octet-stream, attachment)]
[derivations.log (application/octet-stream, attachment)]
[gexp.log (application/octet-stream, attachment)]
[grafts.log (application/octet-stream, attachment)]
[graph.log (application/octet-stream, attachment)]
[packages.log (application/octet-stream, attachment)]
[profiles.log (application/octet-stream, attachment)]
[store.log (application/octet-stream, attachment)]

This bug report was last modified 3 years and 266 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.