From unknown Sun Jun 15 09:00:40 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#50204: "Success" seen in failed copy message Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?=E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC?= Dan Jacobson Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 19:28:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 50204 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 50204@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.162991962427266 (code B ref -1); Wed, 25 Aug 2021 19:28:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Aug 2021 19:27:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47896 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mIyYC-00075i-7q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 15:27:04 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:47416) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mIyY8-00075H-Ay for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 15:27:02 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45364) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mIyY8-0007o5-4v for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 15:27:00 -0400 Received: from bumble.maple.relay.mailchannels.net ([23.83.214.25]:33479) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mIyY6-0005gC-8C for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 15:26:59 -0400 X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DD7A362109 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 19:25:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a73.g.dreamhost.com (100-96-133-168.trex.outbound.svc.cluster.local [100.96.133.168]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D7849361B31 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 19:25:53 +0000 (UTC) X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a73.g.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 100.96.133.168 (trex/6.4.3); Wed, 25 Aug 2021 19:25:54 +0000 X-MC-Relay: Neutral X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost X-Towering-Belong: 0329c851683f0f9d_1629919554090_1156900783 X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1629919554090:772919594 X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1629919554089 Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a73.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a73.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 988668A6E6 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 12:25:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=jidanni.org; h=from:to :subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=jidanni.org; bh=7ljQ9a5PSo9PirxM5s 5G8YU+vB8=; b=K9ogh0quLPmXrh4S0RVmxf/lH5L7ZgDwCC9oA7okN4yPT38x1G U93SRwLSB0TRGcyfSEOglJz5ujxp8JeTXC+Q2ZwvF22HqYZ5r7ktoPk9VaFtpXk9 40OHkobaBV/IkBLMtXZLQ+ZpE0Oki37OsqgmsTVu5T08U8QxSXeTrMEz0= Received: from jidanni.org (114-41-6-240.dynamic-ip.hinet.net [114.41.6.240]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jidanni@jidanni.org) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a73.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5246C8A6E3 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 12:25:52 -0700 (PDT) X-DH-BACKEND: pdx1-sub0-mail-a73 From: =?UTF-8?Q?=E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC?= Dan Jacobson Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 03:25:49 +0800 Message-ID: <878s0pxr5u.5.fsf@jidanni.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=23.83.214.25; envelope-from=jidanni@jidanni.org; helo=bumble.maple.relay.mailchannels.net X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) I did $ ln -s ~/mapping/aiyongxian/aiyongxian.kml /tmp/ Then in emacs I did C ;; dired-do-copy Overwrite =E2=80=98/tmp/aiyongxian.kml=E2=80=99? [Type yn!q or C-h] y Copy: =E2=80=98/home/jidanni/mapping/aiyongxian/aiyongxian.kml=E2=80=99 t= o =E2=80=98/tmp/aiyongxian.kml=E2=80=99 failed: (file-error Input and output files are the same Success /home/jidanni/map= ping/aiyongxian/aiyongxian.kml /tmp/aiyongxian.kml) OK, but why the word "Success"?! From unknown Sun Jun 15 09:00:40 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#50204: "Success" seen in failed copy message Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 06:21:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 50204 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: =?UTF-8?Q?=E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC?= Dan Jacobson Cc: 50204@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 50204-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B50204.162995882632146 (code B ref 50204); Thu, 26 Aug 2021 06:21:02 +0000 Received: (at 50204) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Aug 2021 06:20:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48192 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mJ8kU-0008MQ-Gz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 02:20:26 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:60974) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mJ8kQ-0008MA-Hk for 50204@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 02:20:24 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:52116) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mJ8kL-00074Q-5n; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 02:20:17 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3461 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mJ8kD-0001OO-9i; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 02:20:17 -0400 Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 09:19:51 +0300 Message-Id: <83v93su3qw.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii In-Reply-To: <878s0pxr5u.5.fsf@jidanni.org> References: <878s0pxr5u.5.fsf@jidanni.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson > > Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 03:25:49 +0800 > > I did > $ ln -s ~/mapping/aiyongxian/aiyongxian.kml /tmp/ > > Then in emacs I did > C ;; dired-do-copy > Overwrite ‘/tmp/aiyongxian.kml’? [Type yn!q or C-h] y > Copy: ‘/home/jidanni/mapping/aiyongxian/aiyongxian.kml’ to ‘/tmp/aiyongxian.kml’ failed: > (file-error Input and output files are the same Success /home/jidanni/mapping/aiyongxian/aiyongxian.kml /tmp/aiyongxian.kml) > > OK, but why the word "Success"?! Because that's not really a "failure": the file was already there. From unknown Sun Jun 15 09:00:40 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#50204: "Success" seen in failed copy message In-Reply-To: <878s0pxr5u.5.fsf@jidanni.org> Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?=E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC?= Dan Jacobson Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 16:54:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 50204 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: 50204@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 50204-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B50204.162999680532497 (code B ref 50204); Thu, 26 Aug 2021 16:54:02 +0000 Received: (at 50204) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Aug 2021 16:53:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50289 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mJIcz-0008S1-Ly for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 12:53:25 -0400 Received: from bumble.birch.relay.mailchannels.net ([23.83.209.25]:48211) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mJIct-0008Rl-Jm for 50204@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 12:53:20 -0400 X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA067482029; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 16:53:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a92.g.dreamhost.com (100-96-16-116.trex-nlb.outbound.svc.cluster.local [100.96.16.116]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 01110481D63; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 16:53:09 +0000 (UTC) X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a92.g.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 100.96.16.116 (trex/6.4.3); Thu, 26 Aug 2021 16:53:10 +0000 X-MC-Relay: Neutral X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost X-Versed-Obese: 4e66ea775f21908d_1629996790716_4021535544 X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1629996790716:1990781404 X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1629996790716 Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a92.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a92.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6ABE8A7E8; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 09:53:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=jidanni.org; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=jidanni.org; bh=ibK3jTdkRuMUxg6tev Z+JbwKKpU=; b=X/g8qR1qLvDL26dU07N29OZ7gn8tGaUlyUhLscG+GvrhAXTrlt bbi1OuKwvKeOCgJi/QvE6zHgOE08m6mhszAgz9RkZONVuQn+yQE0cj/AyekybKP6 WBbWqqcvvdoIfzM8Xz8bp1+N0bhR2+2MbDGs/F+grbiHjkmw3I+g0ZZec= Received: from jidanni.org (36-234-69-8.dynamic-ip.hinet.net [36.234.69.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jidanni@jidanni.org) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a92.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 073518A850; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 09:53:08 -0700 (PDT) X-DH-BACKEND: pdx1-sub0-mail-a92 From: =?UTF-8?Q?=E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC?= Dan Jacobson References: <878s0pxr5u.5.fsf@jidanni.org> <83v93su3qw.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2021 00:53:04 +0800 Message-ID: <877dg8no5r.5.fsf@jidanni.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) >>>>> "EZ" =3D=3D Eli Zaretskii writes: >> I did >> $ ln -s ~/mapping/aiyongxian/aiyongxian.kml /tmp/ >>=20 >> Then in emacs I did >> C ;; dired-do-copy >> Overwrite =E2=80=98/tmp/aiyongxian.kml=E2=80=99? [Type yn!q or C-h] y >> Copy: =E2=80=98/home/jidanni/mapping/aiyongxian/aiyongxian.kml=E2=80=99= to =E2=80=98/tmp/aiyongxian.kml=E2=80=99 failed: >> (file-error Input and output files are the same Success /home/jidanni/= mapping/aiyongxian/aiyongxian.kml /tmp/aiyongxian.kml) >>=20 >> OK, but why the word "Success"?! EZ> Because that's not really a "failure": the file was already there. OK, but, the shell says 1, not 0: $ ln -s ~/mln -s ~/mapping/aiyongxian/aiyongxian.kml /tmp/ $ cp ~/mapping/aiyongxian/aiyongxian.kml /tmp/; echo $? cp: '/home/jidanni/mapping/aiyongxian/aiyongxian.kml' and '/tmp/aiyongxia= n.kml' are the same file 1 Also >> (file-error Input and output files are the same Success /home/jidanni/= mapping/aiyongxian/aiyongxian.kml /tmp/aiyongxian.kml) should be >> (file-error Input and output files are the same. Success. /home/jidann= i/mapping/aiyongxian/aiyongxian.kml /tmp/aiyongxian.kml) But that doesn't make sense either. Obviously the word Success has been stuck in the middle, and should be moved to the front or back. And in fact changed to Failure. From unknown Sun Jun 15 09:00:40 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#50204: "Success" seen in failed copy message Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 17:04:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 50204 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: =?UTF-8?Q?=E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC?= Dan Jacobson Cc: 50204@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 50204-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B50204.16299974171126 (code B ref 50204); Thu, 26 Aug 2021 17:04:01 +0000 Received: (at 50204) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Aug 2021 17:03:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50297 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mJImv-0000I5-BG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 13:03:37 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:57078) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mJImt-0000Hs-LU for 50204@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 13:03:36 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:43466) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mJImo-0008SV-7Q; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 13:03:30 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3356 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mJImn-0007FT-7w; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 13:03:29 -0400 Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 20:03:09 +0300 Message-Id: <83o89krvea.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii In-Reply-To: <877dg8no5r.5.fsf@jidanni.org> (message from =?UTF-8?Q?=E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC?= Dan Jacobson on Fri, 27 Aug 2021 00:53:04 +0800) References: <878s0pxr5u.5.fsf@jidanni.org> <83v93su3qw.fsf@gnu.org> <877dg8no5r.5.fsf@jidanni.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson > Cc: 50204@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2021 00:53:04 +0800 > > >> OK, but why the word "Success"?! > > EZ> Because that's not really a "failure": the file was already there. > > OK, but, the shell says 1, not 0: So does Emacs: that's why you get the error message. The "Success" part comes from the value of errno. From unknown Sun Jun 15 09:00:40 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#50204: "Success" seen in failed copy message In-Reply-To: <878s0pxr5u.5.fsf@jidanni.org> Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?=E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC?= Dan Jacobson Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 17:30:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 50204 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: 50204@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 50204-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B50204.16299989524084 (code B ref 50204); Thu, 26 Aug 2021 17:30:02 +0000 Received: (at 50204) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Aug 2021 17:29:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50335 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mJJBf-00013o-RW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 13:29:12 -0400 Received: from beige.elm.relay.mailchannels.net ([23.83.212.16]:42981) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mJJBe-00013c-2W for 50204@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 13:29:11 -0400 X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 339D02142D; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 17:29:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a92.g.dreamhost.com (unknown [127.0.0.6]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C6108213B4; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 17:29:07 +0000 (UTC) X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a92.g.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 100.112.147.104 (trex/6.4.3); Thu, 26 Aug 2021 17:29:08 +0000 X-MC-Relay: Neutral X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost X-Cooing-Well-Made: 4e0929205dd5e4a4_1629998948055_2987894253 X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1629998948055:2466429497 X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1629998948055 Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a92.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a92.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E7138A850; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 10:28:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=jidanni.org; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=jidanni.org; bh=+mCBH/i4gjrXoqk3/uwIGXNQi1c=; b=CL/m6XbUvGnlm QFecrrWcUGZHipleqYDulC0mR+AY/g8wE65JrqB/ZOa/SNxkGi2/pj4hoT8MK1T8 Q236o4CuzElzs29W4U4EC4NRp+qFqc5OiiYfZ1wUmNoehHYsWKpg2neBLaIiHBWc fZ14VytjYImcxVOryDy5n3OqD121U4= Received: from jidanni.org (36-234-69-8.dynamic-ip.hinet.net [36.234.69.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jidanni@jidanni.org) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a92.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E56808A7E7; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 10:28:36 -0700 (PDT) X-DH-BACKEND: pdx1-sub0-mail-a92 From: =?UTF-8?Q?=E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC?= Dan Jacobson References: <878s0pxr5u.5.fsf@jidanni.org> <83v93su3qw.fsf@gnu.org> <877dg8no5r.5.fsf@jidanni.org> <83o89krvea.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2021 01:28:32 +0800 Message-ID: <87zgt4m7y7.5.fsf@jidanni.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) >>>>> "EZ" == Eli Zaretskii writes: EZ> So does Emacs: that's why you get the error message. The "Success" EZ> part comes from the value of errno. I see. Success means failure. Or maybe failure means success. OK. Got it. From unknown Sun Jun 15 09:00:40 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#50204: "Success" seen in failed copy message Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 17:33:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 50204 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: =?UTF-8?Q?=E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC?= Dan Jacobson Cc: 50204@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 50204-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B50204.16299991424603 (code B ref 50204); Thu, 26 Aug 2021 17:33:02 +0000 Received: (at 50204) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Aug 2021 17:32:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50361 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mJJEj-0001CB-Tc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 13:32:22 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:34736) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mJJEi-0001Bw-7s for 50204@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 13:32:20 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:44160) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mJJEc-0002Hw-Rh; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 13:32:14 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1178 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mJJEb-0006M5-V2; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 13:32:14 -0400 Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 20:31:57 +0300 Message-Id: <83h7fcru2a.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii In-Reply-To: <87zgt4m7y7.5.fsf@jidanni.org> (message from =?UTF-8?Q?=E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC?= Dan Jacobson on Fri, 27 Aug 2021 01:28:32 +0800) References: <878s0pxr5u.5.fsf@jidanni.org> <83v93su3qw.fsf@gnu.org> <877dg8no5r.5.fsf@jidanni.org> <83o89krvea.fsf@gnu.org> <87zgt4m7y7.5.fsf@jidanni.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson > Cc: 50204@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2021 01:28:32 +0800 > > >>>>> "EZ" == Eli Zaretskii writes: > EZ> So does Emacs: that's why you get the error message. The "Success" > EZ> part comes from the value of errno. > > I see. Success means failure. > Or maybe failure means success. Also "failure is not an option". From unknown Sun Jun 15 09:00:40 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#50204: "Success" seen in failed copy message Resent-From: Stefan Kangas Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 15:47:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 50204 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: =?UTF-8?Q?=E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC?= Dan Jacobson Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 50204@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 50204-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B50204.163223918919446 (code B ref 50204); Tue, 21 Sep 2021 15:47:02 +0000 Received: (at 50204) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Sep 2021 15:46:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47550 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mShyX-00053C-0Z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 11:46:29 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-f43.google.com ([209.85.216.43]:56145) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mShyM-0004nf-1O for 50204@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 11:46:19 -0400 Received: by mail-pj1-f43.google.com with SMTP id t20so14651676pju.5 for <50204@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 08:46:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:user-agent :mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to:cc :content-transfer-encoding; bh=kUWZwwpUBbt/smfhGCChyAA/ljNj2BNtJ5P8N0KE+yY=; b=KYkwmPgKms1Snl4qaIa9Io8GKUw2/cR96f55FuzA5clJ3AI5IQ90/JdNx88YvxSL6p fEJ8jyX2tQxp6oWTVnjMLTkt0SbrWWAffyelKWcOYsNvzuyaQzQllV9qLXutqEsj3MPU 9aK9yoxDkzwVVK4lTsq3J5CVD+aao6jRhj7Dl+jWv24/efU/UjH5l/G8LZ5g/ap2iP95 yR/BCmkbN23pv7B7iQYkslOdUD2Oiuw9DHpH/AoWg2WIeiixPA5eEwjHso7y13vPPJFb LVStmqpz6mJVbqfa3qVgTbUZt+0Iy44e3Owe+4AJz5GP6Wm567vlfnXochz6RUnZzHg9 AUPg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531sjXkgPR6KHOpg+87IQdeQ5DUrLXdN2/1NqDcu+gAMRRiiMAoJ PqntC5OgAMEtVWgb6BjreI+rBbiNL0WO2HlKGuc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyMgdt5IP2Bdla9EZVKb7/2GS9+7G7xFihJZdZixhK6wj1Y6kpypfssFT7DqgEOtc8ds0sUl83AVnN6Up3VOis= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:3805:: with SMTP id mq5mr5950735pjb.143.1632239172380; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 08:46:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 08:46:12 -0700 From: Stefan Kangas In-Reply-To: <87zgt4m7y7.5.fsf@jidanni.org> ("=?UTF-8?Q?=E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC?= Dan Jacobson"'s message of "Fri, 27 Aug 2021 01:28:32 +0800") References: <878s0pxr5u.5.fsf@jidanni.org> <83v93su3qw.fsf@gnu.org> <877dg8no5r.5.fsf@jidanni.org> <83o89krvea.fsf@gnu.org> <87zgt4m7y7.5.fsf@jidanni.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 08:46:11 -0700 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) =E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC Dan Jacobson writes: >>>>>> "EZ" =3D=3D Eli Zaretskii writes: > EZ> So does Emacs: that's why you get the error message. The "Success" > EZ> part comes from the value of errno. > > I see. Success means failure. > Or maybe failure means success. > OK. Got it. I think we should thank POSIX for any confusion that can come from this. So should this be closed as notabug? From unknown Sun Jun 15 09:00:40 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#50204: "Success" seen in failed copy message Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 16:02:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 50204 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Stefan Kangas Cc: 50204@debbugs.gnu.org, jidanni@jidanni.org Received: via spool by 50204-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B50204.163224011931127 (code B ref 50204); Tue, 21 Sep 2021 16:02:02 +0000 Received: (at 50204) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Sep 2021 16:01:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47622 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mSiDW-00085l-LA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 12:01:59 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:51974) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mSiDR-0007yy-TD for 50204@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 12:01:58 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:56400) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mSiDM-0007Mt-Bq; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 12:01:48 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3693 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mSiDK-0006C5-AP; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 12:01:46 -0400 Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 19:01:42 +0300 Message-Id: <83h7edyl21.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Kangas on Tue, 21 Sep 2021 08:46:11 -0700) References: <878s0pxr5u.5.fsf@jidanni.org> <83v93su3qw.fsf@gnu.org> <877dg8no5r.5.fsf@jidanni.org> <83o89krvea.fsf@gnu.org> <87zgt4m7y7.5.fsf@jidanni.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Stefan Kangas > Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 08:46:11 -0700 > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 50204@debbugs.gnu.org > > 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson writes: > > >>>>>> "EZ" == Eli Zaretskii writes: > > EZ> So does Emacs: that's why you get the error message. The "Success" > > EZ> part comes from the value of errno. > > > > I see. Success means failure. > > Or maybe failure means success. > > OK. Got it. > > I think we should thank POSIX for any confusion that can come from this. > > So should this be closed as notabug? Yes, I think so. From unknown Sun Jun 15 09:00:40 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#50204: "Success" seen in failed copy message Resent-From: Stefan Kangas Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 16:41:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 50204 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: 50204@debbugs.gnu.org, jidanni@jidanni.org Received: via spool by 50204-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B50204.16322424495609 (code B ref 50204); Tue, 21 Sep 2021 16:41:01 +0000 Received: (at 50204) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Sep 2021 16:40:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47697 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mSip7-0001SK-Gp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 12:40:49 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-f169.google.com ([209.85.214.169]:39457) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mSip5-0001Ru-IV for 50204@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 12:40:48 -0400 Received: by mail-pl1-f169.google.com with SMTP id c4so13768331pls.6 for <50204@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 09:40:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=02ozylAzB/qg7Y865URMy44lQM37/1D7r3dI35jOG/w=; b=yDtwwgV/N3PxGe2yc+gP3o3laCl9D9NOLZ3qIKvKe6Q+by83CaYfF4CvcZ5sYVTxmF SzebraYn+HKQ/b7m3Yug0+oka/ZCThyT/t9VOc+AmFf4o8zBXFWTFZWzasSROJc9OsHT wMw3Mc8lvs90cPBpQEglIh3dHBJPR5Nxz46AyiRiOr088CMX3k0G7GVVTHIFzNKLW4S6 wgtkDOYq4DZE2Z/JwUBEzz0y8NYzZ8uecHtWrTvauFgkujCGz8/+Bz+tzLiRrZaYoXav gOdeUg/EvfvWq2O0VGkRMcQwUO0lwcORWa61gho/ik8h6ChnMV2+vYKaW6/5zDC5lfag T3kA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530hh0MmEDYEc/WyZExSj2EJ/F7CKH8a3JIF4ZeRqy7Biar41Fd9 mVzl8JhZDR+VXBgEnyOsw3ooiueDpldTm4AQwC3Jsihk X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzVNhNFPC/h9UTrPG5n8PX441RtJ6TOTN8s1b4f8GXtepf8ZifbkcUvt1yY0y7F6APiLkjiNsYmxSk3qIbb/RA= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:3805:: with SMTP id mq5mr6223078pjb.143.1632242441668; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 09:40:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 753933720722 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 09:40:41 -0700 From: Stefan Kangas In-Reply-To: <83h7edyl21.fsf@gnu.org> References: <878s0pxr5u.5.fsf@jidanni.org> <83v93su3qw.fsf@gnu.org> <877dg8no5r.5.fsf@jidanni.org> <83o89krvea.fsf@gnu.org> <87zgt4m7y7.5.fsf@jidanni.org> <83h7edyl21.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 09:40:41 -0700 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) tags 50204 notabug close 50204 thanks Eli Zaretskii writes: >> So should this be closed as notabug? > > Yes, I think so. I'm therefore closing this bug report.