From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Aug 23 19:14:37 2021 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Aug 2021 23:14:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42738 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mIJ9F-0003sU-L5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 19:14:37 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:39862) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mIJ9B-0003sJ-1b for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 19:14:32 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49888) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mIJ9A-0004LQ-TQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 19:14:28 -0400 Received: from cyan.elm.relay.mailchannels.net ([23.83.212.47]:17890) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mIJ99-0001ru-0a for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 19:14:28 -0400 X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 387F332266E for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 23:14:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a48.g.dreamhost.com (100-101-162-87.trex.outbound.svc.cluster.local [100.101.162.87]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id BFF4232261D for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 23:14:21 +0000 (UTC) X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a48.g.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 100.101.162.87 (trex/6.3.3); Mon, 23 Aug 2021 23:14:22 +0000 X-MC-Relay: Neutral X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost X-Illustrious-Cooperative: 292ff1fe2b2d0058_1629760462002_1284409408 X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1629760462002:2047752003 X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1629760462002 Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a48.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a48.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F1A57F01F for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 16:14:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=jidanni.org; h=from:to :subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=jidanni.org; bh=u1nRw7ihFVsUWE1YsN aXqcZRi7s=; b=WQARe0PhBzvlwicgx9/zdHv5Z6XgTAToVNrNaEiCunWwHfZJEY y/YohoKsbVDZz7ZuG+A9ikqcsFIke11kYFI2uaMmIsfcsiEyHuwdhGQD69d/Du/E EfFqDipFMxBLKdCiqJeOTHXmB9MBxu0eN/UCpmE9BPdq4jKR+R9rbXiOk= Received: from jidanni.org (114-46-58-94.dynamic-ip.hinet.net [114.46.58.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jidanni@jidanni.org) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a48.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 75B13856B7 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 16:14:20 -0700 (PDT) X-DH-BACKEND: pdx1-sub0-mail-a48 From: =?utf-8?B?56mN5Li55bC8?= Dan Jacobson To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: Support U+20DD COMBINING ENCLOSING CIRCLE Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 07:14:17 +0800 Message-ID: <87eeaj21py.8.fsf@jidanni.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=23.83.212.47; envelope-from=jidanni@jidanni.org; helo=cyan.elm.relay.mailchannels.net X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.1 (-) How do =E6=AA=A2=E2=83=9D x=E2=83=9D look to you? In https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=3D1242732#c2 only Firefox puts them in the circles. Emacs is at least a little better than chrome, but still puts the circle at back, instead of around. emacs-version "27.1" From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Aug 24 07:55:12 2021 Received: (at 50177) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Aug 2021 11:55:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43357 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mIV1L-0006sS-RN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 07:55:12 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:60122) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mIV1K-0006s9-7s for 50177@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 07:55:10 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:32846) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mIV1E-0005tz-Pj; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 07:55:04 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2500 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mIV1E-0006DJ-DV; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 07:55:04 -0400 Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 14:54:58 +0300 Message-Id: <83bl5nvyzx.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: =?utf-8?B?56mN5Li55bC8?= Dan Jacobson In-Reply-To: <87eeaj21py.8.fsf@jidanni.org> Subject: Re: bug#50177: Support U+20DD COMBINING ENCLOSING CIRCLE References: <87eeaj21py.8.fsf@jidanni.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 50177 Cc: 50177@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson > > Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 07:14:17 +0800 > > How do > 檢⃝ x⃝ > look to you? Look correctly: as a single grapheme cluster. > In https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1242732#c2 > only Firefox puts them in the circles. > > Emacs is at least a little better than chrome, but still puts the circle > at back, instead of around. You need a font that has glyphs for both the character and the circle. Emacs can only compose character glyphs from the same font. I see no bug here. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Aug 24 09:39:34 2021 Received: (at 50177) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Aug 2021 13:39:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43458 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mIWeM-00019Z-Dd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 09:39:34 -0400 Received: from black.elm.relay.mailchannels.net ([23.83.212.19]:43980) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mIWeJ-00019P-Nw for 50177@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 09:39:32 -0400 X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0271B922586; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 13:39:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a92.g.dreamhost.com (100-96-18-119.trex.outbound.svc.cluster.local [100.96.18.119]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 906BC922DC2; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 13:39:29 +0000 (UTC) X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a92.g.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 100.96.18.119 (trex/6.3.3); Tue, 24 Aug 2021 13:39:29 +0000 X-MC-Relay: Neutral X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost X-Drop-Eight: 16d4803a2d162b67_1629812369810_2755537991 X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1629812369809:1835427413 X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1629812369809 Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a92.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a92.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E0CD8A7E8; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 06:39:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=jidanni.org; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=jidanni.org; bh=sIkywr7u2nliB6PB+a Y8cbN89jg=; b=YYorQI2BGZ7QptY1pu09DWidRB3LbNrWH+5jgnsn37oK0/i4ni zTHObFdVyu5+ViZnuExNMl6GSiU6M2TMA4CW1WDQrjm6nKpSeExbTick0qtVQmEj L+YOvOp3w7HRNHWBjfvb+uPHp2Vrog7EIcgoXccfwpfRWQJISM3SOBNak= Received: from jidanni.org (36-234-68-130.dynamic-ip.hinet.net [36.234.68.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jidanni@jidanni.org) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a92.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C56418A84B; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 06:39:28 -0700 (PDT) X-DH-BACKEND: pdx1-sub0-mail-a92 From: =?utf-8?B?56mN5Li55bC8?= Dan Jacobson To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#50177: Support U+20DD COMBINING ENCLOSING CIRCLE References: <87eeaj21py.8.fsf@jidanni.org> <83bl5nvyzx.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 21:39:21 +0800 Message-ID: <87ilzvm06u.5.fsf@jidanni.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 50177 Cc: 50177@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) >>>>> "EZ" =3D=3D Eli Zaretskii writes: >> How do >> =E6=AA=A2=E2=83=9D x=E2=83=9D >> look to you? EZ> Look correctly: as a single grapheme cluster. EZ> You need a font that has glyphs for both the character and the circle= . EZ> Emacs can only compose character glyphs from the same font. OK, it's a deal. On debian what package can I install to prove your theor= y? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Aug 24 11:30:26 2021 Received: (at 50177) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Aug 2021 15:30:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45030 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mIYNe-0004jW-7k for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 11:30:26 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:55244) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mIYNc-0004cz-UQ for 50177@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 11:30:25 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=lSUcfZZyYWyY2ifE6HokWOnpfcgoEdfmoQ5iwaby+9M=; b=HCICHzzmLCQDSQQNRzgTHCGv1d hR1rWq03N1AMEoYjsbcApqyoyT3JjXZWkQttCNYZNyFEIK0o2z1xaXuv92ERIM8pLAXbyTtLB+mhX t7Tmh0Dpow3DvTUtj2f1Us4RN2JC6KhoZmSTGFqXrtM9L/nDourvH1jELWUAHtG80VPE=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mIYNS-0000d4-BQ; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 17:30:18 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#50177: Support U+20DD COMBINING ENCLOSING CIRCLE References: <87eeaj21py.8.fsf@jidanni.org> <83bl5nvyzx.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 17:30:13 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83bl5nvyzx.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 24 Aug 2021 14:54:58 +0300") Message-ID: <87k0kaoo6y.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> How do >> 檢⃝ x⃝ >> look to you? > > Look correctly: as a single grapheme cluster. I'm getting: Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 50177 Cc: 50177@debbugs.gnu.org, =?utf-8?B?56mN5Li55bC8?= Dan Jacobson X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Eli Zaretskii writes: >> How do >> =E6=AA=A2=E2=83=9D x=E2=83=9D >> look to you? > > Look correctly: as a single grapheme cluster. I'm getting: --=-=-= Content-Type: image/png Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAAFoAAAAjCAIAAACb54pcAAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBjSFJN AAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAABmJLR0QA/wD/AP+gvaeTAAAA EGNhTnYAAAeAAAAEsAAAA6QAAAEQ0IGiQQAABrlJREFUaN7tmWlUU0cUx28IkIQkJGwNIBhZXQAj CAhGFhVEK261VKlUOYCKChq3WvdSqkWq4r7WQxRRpCCugAoCogaXmhYaQAn46hYVI4TEIgnJ9IMN xmOr8SRyas3vvC93Zt69d/4z82beewD/DH1KCcLQ78l9NAspk4sRhuo5ni9My/DMP5oQqqkr+nHT xrX5v9xQIkx8ZpITTt0+cPV9hCF0aqkbAID5VK4CYUi+czIJtATnFlchwdDzixVZq9dt3MQT3RIK LyOE5U1Wt3hrDvpBGzkAjHsEfcPNrX9U2yGvFzcd+3ntKHfNrhLG5HVg6PaSgS9M27hKFYauz+j1 LonQvKfsOl/W/GfDs8dnC9eFeyQceEWOt+ZgwIABAwYM/IehhS1JWzSU/HoFJWTG3gV+/7sdzejN 1SSPyMmj+5m+XkH2j0yIHhbM9mWz+/eifixyvA7OhGRm5xkYHmCrZMUXnDtwpnjjbG8zMtmMTDD6 mOTAE81pVBqt94KiKw3XD2U6bTUekfO0OXeC7YwHq6ru3asSZATTaFQa9YNWxVjrlkNWNpZPsYY7 9UDlJXqF75YCgIPP1DLZ2Yefu1rkAyu1vLW1Fwi3DnDb8Fv3dQBH7xsaFRUWHujqyKAR5ZKHd4RV JSV5P5cLWpCeQny2TaEQKhRChaJRiTCVslGhECpqj4plpU/bNk00xRu9fEHCGeFNo3OFv6e4m9Bt mbO4qGEhq9ukMGfN4Z6s521YlRA60MXGgmRCpNs4eQfHLlt3ofZ4VjKLrp8wBHMGw5rBsGYwPFZe wS4tdXMc+mXq1szG60uHOMXki66JXrmquDHWASvyRFmjCPascVGTOPEDLXWJTmXvaLyN7m+I1PBi NnjVTSX25PhYu65xcBi1j1+cndD7n5/jZi4xP53mc0f11N/SZS0oyKlrwcrmWNDiD6LKuZGD7E3x dgMjgiNeuYJYDCA7+0b4fGIEAC5J/Jqk3roFJgWuqOvEHh4ZafPCJgduE95Gok0TbLp6673matH2 EW8efmpQ+olr6T4UPckxLFOKIYQ1HF24PCNLlD9RqzHvFVdyMTmAYU7UKbSpz7fFcnSjIMYGgBK2 65IKXdo7smse4FkphZeXOOHf6saoZ/L5wjQ/Y52lMKbaMcfsrOWJn2Md7U2dAg7TjoIn0B2YPZjM HkxmD0dLUyBaOKpNe7pGSI+FdWjHJLyOCbgv4d1ErZnzp6+/i5oatvi/PAuSPs2pSwkhaOfGd3nN iXE0XeVwSeKjfdPItvMqMX45v/XCKXRtOpOdIkIYQhhCWPPOQTA8rUVt1qW661kOACOXuHIphhCm EHztrzHZTEZn1G720dqN1w/V26LMtI35jjk+O/o53Wt8pvRv8+nhSLp3/Al4H6gazxTwOwGgqbCI //xleU9P91vXqrV2I7ha4+rlqoscwZyydJO00PTidgAAydHRXifa2ztwcgBAcplEKutQb+kquUzS 9kyuca9z4uX98mjK/HylrpPDNTnj+yDF3but7pz1qQEv14aVlYlY3Km9qmKxkZWVLnI8qD52sqK0 4uYjFQAAUra3tXSQFDI5ABB8EjNWzWar5y7FPyljxbQBGvfijEkE1P6so1M3MYw9Zmen++Mq04b6 LjvypPfi7KWh6iepRKKi0d5hKdLpSCLRRQ7h+c3cG080Ctp5+5OOqMb4t5zKlfpx4gJlRTm8ZhD9 cuhYxxBObJ97eQX8NgAAZsC0YPGetRce6TgzCKyUQxx/xcVF0w40Pi6clVDw0Dk2a2uoBQAA3LmF uXm5ae3LybPP/VtN+lm/tvMqsbI5FgAAIWua23bMDJhTirBzM9UjZTW1DAkPTwQAINq6shYd1Mep 1Cwoo0yJqosSus5c1Ig9PISu535hCQBAn1T0G8dTy18HzrOvlsfYwvuQA2EIXaj7FzlYqeUIYbrL QRuRjqkw8ckJ9pqllMHbhbdRy75YRwAgDt95tmCKNscg8wnZ57iRZNC/HADAThFJt+zhYQhhSkEs DE9raU4JgZ5ZYvXW223YRBysyZ7b983nK7xzPLcmb7S9/sJqyOG9WFAa60QmEElm5pbWATm/qjpv ymQCqbRkfZh14HenZfljCN2nBxAHzCwVZC1j0/9l0VD9OJk1FbP8yPoMamLv5etpZwwAQHHw9frE pCub/hGJXw0PUn8NIzl6sPtZ4qBbMXWO3Hb5/BVuYtRgB6p6T8CR7f3HT99zsaRq91i3dx6fbu6B /qH0Gxc9PTpsKMuGiAMEAM+bq8tLj+w7XFAjRR965wwYMGDAwAfPXwR6/+hLMkNRAAAAAElFTkSu QmCC --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable But indeed, the x and the =E2=83=9D are from different fonts, so this isn't surprising. We have a number of open bug reports in this area. At least 44784, 23292, 17739, which may or may not be the same underlying problem. (Probably different issues, really.) I haven't looked at the machinery here at all -- is there a fundamental reason why Emacs can't combine glyphs from different fonts? --=20 (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Aug 24 12:25:46 2021 Received: (at 50177) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Aug 2021 16:25:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45098 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mIZFB-00085e-Vv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 12:25:46 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:38384) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mIZFA-00085N-UL for 50177@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 12:25:45 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:42966) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mIZF5-0004q7-EH; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 12:25:39 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3385 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mIZF5-0007de-1X; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 12:25:39 -0400 Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 19:25:32 +0300 Message-Id: <835yvux11f.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: =?utf-8?B?56mN5Li55bC8?= Dan Jacobson In-Reply-To: <87ilzvm06u.5.fsf@jidanni.org> (message from =?utf-8?B?56mN?= =?utf-8?B?5Li55bC8?= Dan Jacobson on Tue, 24 Aug 2021 21:39:21 +0800) Subject: Re: bug#50177: Support U+20DD COMBINING ENCLOSING CIRCLE References: <87eeaj21py.8.fsf@jidanni.org> <83bl5nvyzx.fsf@gnu.org> <87ilzvm06u.5.fsf@jidanni.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 50177 Cc: 50177@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson > Cc: 50177@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 21:39:21 +0800 > > >>>>> "EZ" == Eli Zaretskii writes: > >> How do > >> 檢⃝ x⃝ > >> look to you? > > EZ> Look correctly: as a single grapheme cluster. > > EZ> You need a font that has glyphs for both the character and the circle. > EZ> Emacs can only compose character glyphs from the same font. > > OK, it's a deal. On debian what package can I install to prove your theory? I don't know, I'm not a Debian user. Lars, can you help here? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Aug 24 12:39:12 2021 Received: (at 50177) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Aug 2021 16:39:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45104 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mIZSC-0002G8-5h for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 12:39:12 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:40944) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mIZSA-0002Fs-CS for 50177@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 12:39:11 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:43342) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mIZS4-0005C1-It; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 12:39:04 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4209 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mIZS4-0006w6-5F; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 12:39:04 -0400 Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 19:38:56 +0300 Message-Id: <8335qyx0f3.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Lars Ingebrigtsen , Kenichi Handa In-Reply-To: <87k0kaoo6y.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Tue, 24 Aug 2021 17:30:13 +0200) Subject: Re: bug#50177: Support U+20DD COMBINING ENCLOSING CIRCLE References: <87eeaj21py.8.fsf@jidanni.org> <83bl5nvyzx.fsf@gnu.org> <87k0kaoo6y.fsf@gnus.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 50177 Cc: 50177@debbugs.gnu.org, jidanni@jidanni.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson , > 50177@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 17:30:13 +0200 > > We have a number of open bug reports in this area. At least 44784, > 23292, 17739, which may or may not be the same underlying problem. > (Probably different issues, really.) 44784 and 23292 are due to a problematic font (DejaVu Sans Mono). 17739 -- not clear. > I haven't looked at the machinery here at all -- is there a fundamental > reason why Emacs can't combine glyphs from different fonts? The basic reason is that glyphs from different fonts cannot combine well because they were designed to look differently, and so offsets don't match. That is almost certainly the reason when we use our fallback composition code in composite.el. I'm less sure about modern shaping engines like HarfBuzz -- we should ask their developers to be sure; feel free to open an issue/question on their GitHub. CC'ing Handa-san, in the hope that he could explain better why we disallow character composition from different fonts. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Aug 25 06:52:15 2021 Received: (at 50177) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Aug 2021 10:52:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45879 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mIqVz-0003i2-ET for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 06:52:15 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:35044) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mIqVx-0003ho-7U for 50177@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 06:52:13 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=+dzrFYpBn2rRzs0r9teMY7dpqixZxlT4BW78GzmKkw0=; b=CuW7fePUXyIZJP4dG7cpCK3udz 8dGqtT44Xg7L3xaXqcgCsxAao30EONY9thISY1B1Fj8sDHj6u3Je1Y9q/QuRhyS3QYSSH/Hz5kUxE nyeKQ4mHU6Zq4qQI0GvKk3DbZo7sY2fkS+RMsww/VW3yJj6xhjCDzPykG6ezrMBtAuOQ=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mIqVm-00035g-Cv; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 12:52:06 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#50177: Support U+20DD COMBINING ENCLOSING CIRCLE References: <87eeaj21py.8.fsf@jidanni.org> <83bl5nvyzx.fsf@gnu.org> <87k0kaoo6y.fsf@gnus.org> <8335qyx0f3.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 12:52:01 +0200 In-Reply-To: <8335qyx0f3.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 24 Aug 2021 19:38:56 +0300") Message-ID: <875yvtn6em.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Eli Zaretskii writes: > 44784 and 23292 are due to a problematic font (DejaVu Sans Mono). OK; I've now merged those two. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 50177 Cc: 50177@debbugs.gnu.org, jidanni@jidanni.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Eli Zaretskii writes: > 44784 and 23292 are due to a problematic font (DejaVu Sans Mono). OK; I've now merged those two. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Aug 28 02:28:20 2021 Received: (at 50177) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Aug 2021 06:28:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53297 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mJrpD-0000ZJ-OU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 02:28:19 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:37270) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mJrp8-0000Yz-Ng for 50177@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 02:28:18 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:54608) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mJrp2-0000VD-W0; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 02:28:09 -0400 Received: from fl1-119-240-89-42.iba.mesh.ad.jp ([119.240.89.42]:57090 helo=shatin) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mJrp2-0007bE-QZ; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 02:28:08 -0400 Received: from handa by shatin with local (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1mJrox-000cdT-QG; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 15:28:03 +0900 From: handa To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#50177: Support U+20DD COMBINING ENCLOSING CIRCLE In-Reply-To: <8335qyx0f3.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Tue, 24 Aug 2021 19:38:56 +0300) Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2021 15:28:03 +0900 Message-ID: <87tuja2ido.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 50177 Cc: handa@gnu.org, 50177@debbugs.gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org, jidanni@jidanni.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) In article <8335qyx0f3.fsf@gnu.org>, Eli Zaretskii writes: > > I haven't looked at the machinery here at all -- is there a fundamental > > reason why Emacs can't combine glyphs from different fonts? > The basic reason is that glyphs from different fonts cannot combine > well because they were designed to look differently, and so offsets > don't match. That is almost certainly the reason when we use our > fallback composition code in composite.el. I'm less sure about modern > shaping engines like HarfBuzz -- we should ask their developers to be > sure; feel free to open an issue/question on their GitHub. > CC'ing Handa-san, in the hope that he could explain better why we > disallow character composition from different fonts. The main reason is what Eli wrote. An opentype font contains rules to tell how to compose two glyphs in that font. But such rules are specific to that font, and there's no way to combine rules of different fonts. So, an opentype rendering engine does not work for different fonts. And, when we artificially compose characters from different fonts, there is a possibility that the resulting image looks like a different character which I think is worse than not composing. --- K. Handa handa@gnu.org From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Aug 28 02:40:18 2021 Received: (at 50177) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Aug 2021 06:40:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53304 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mJs0n-0000tY-Sf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 02:40:18 -0400 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:38695) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mJs0k-0000tE-Ez for 50177@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 02:40:17 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8EFF240026 for <50177@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 08:40:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4GxRlq0bGJz6tmF; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 08:40:06 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2021 06:40:02 +0000 (UTC) Message-Id: <20210828.084002.1335089005801839087.wl@gnu.org> To: handa@gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#50177: Support U+20DD COMBINING ENCLOSING CIRCLE From: Werner LEMBERG In-Reply-To: <87tuja2ido.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87eeaj21py.8.fsf@jidanni.org> <8335qyx0f3.fsf@gnu.org> <87tuja2ido.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -2.1 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 50177 Cc: 50177@debbugs.gnu.org, eliz@gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org, jidanni@jidanni.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.1 (---) >> CC'ing Handa-san, in the hope that he could explain better why we >> disallow character composition from different fonts. > > The main reason is what Eli wrote. An opentype font contains rules > to tell how to compose two glyphs in that font. But such rules are > specific to that font, and there's no way to combine rules of > different fonts. So, an opentype rendering engine does not work for > different fonts. > > And, when we artificially compose characters from different fonts, > there is a possibility that the resulting image looks like a > different character which I think is worse than not composing. +1 Werner From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Aug 28 03:32:50 2021 Received: (at 50177) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Aug 2021 07:32:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53325 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mJspe-000299-G4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 03:32:50 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43680) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mJspd-00028x-6h for 50177@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 03:32:49 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:55834) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mJspX-0004f6-RU; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 03:32:43 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1762 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mJspV-00057M-5E; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 03:32:43 -0400 Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2021 10:32:26 +0300 Message-Id: <83y28mnhx1.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: handa In-Reply-To: <87tuja2ido.fsf@gnu.org> (message from handa on Sat, 28 Aug 2021 15:28:03 +0900) Subject: Re: bug#50177: Support U+20DD COMBINING ENCLOSING CIRCLE References: <87tuja2ido.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 50177 Cc: 50177@debbugs.gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org, jidanni@jidanni.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: handa > Cc: larsi@gnus.org, jidanni@jidanni.org, 50177@debbugs.gnu.org, handa@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2021 15:28:03 +0900 > > In article <8335qyx0f3.fsf@gnu.org>, Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > I haven't looked at the machinery here at all -- is there a fundamental > > > reason why Emacs can't combine glyphs from different fonts? > > > The basic reason is that glyphs from different fonts cannot combine > > well because they were designed to look differently, and so offsets > > don't match. That is almost certainly the reason when we use our > > fallback composition code in composite.el. I'm less sure about modern > > shaping engines like HarfBuzz -- we should ask their developers to be > > sure; feel free to open an issue/question on their GitHub. > > > CC'ing Handa-san, in the hope that he could explain better why we > > disallow character composition from different fonts. > > The main reason is what Eli wrote. An opentype font contains rules to > tell how to compose two glyphs in that font. But such rules are > specific to that font, and there's no way to combine rules of different > fonts. So, an opentype rendering engine does not work for different > fonts. > > And, when we artificially compose characters from different fonts, there > is a possibility that the resulting image looks like a different > character which I think is worse than not composing. OK, thanks. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Nov 14 01:50:10 2021 Received: (at 50177) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Nov 2021 06:50:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48927 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mm9L7-0002fI-Ul for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 01:50:10 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:57134) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mm9L4-0002eS-TU for 50177@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 01:50:08 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=MYLqVCDgMSu3MaU1XGjwdYGbAB3Z24qYql8y0vwy5vs=; b=gOzTOBaxch582tMXlbP61/UwKO fo2/q3hf5sjPlksCBOGYC/qkeQw2BIxlfGfxn0Qjjt9SBD4gpJx0l6GZbC18zLC0Jbl2eif9pqDDQ ezNdsBp2t+OiF8V35p38K0k4QSA1AsukmLKS3gX5kqbCVTQyGheqFijxsuGUzUcAOMpc=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mm9Kv-0001SR-1w; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 07:49:59 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#50177: Support U+20DD COMBINING ENCLOSING CIRCLE References: <87tuja2ido.fsf@gnu.org> <83y28mnhx1.fsf@gnu.org> X-Now-Playing: Microtub's _Sonic Drift_: "Sonic Drift" Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2021 07:49:56 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83y28mnhx1.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 28 Aug 2021 10:32:26 +0300") Message-ID: <87v90v9qp7.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> And, when we artificially compose characters from different fonts, there >> is a possibility that the resulting image looks like a different >> character which I think is worse than not composing. [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 50177 Cc: handa , jidanni@jidanni.org, 50177@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Eli Zaretskii writes: >> And, when we artificially compose characters from different fonts, there >> is a possibility that the resulting image looks like a different >> character which I think is worse than not composing. > > OK, thanks. Then it seems like things here are working as designed, and I'm closing this bug report. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Nov 14 01:50:15 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Nov 2021 06:50:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48930 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mm9LD-0002fe-7G for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 01:50:15 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:57150) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mm9LB-0002f9-NJ for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 01:50:13 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=+fR/KXX5/tCM8fNgnCSniz6vUnPMt6L9pnXsyS280us=; b=J/FFRD1H/JLPbI8GQZvHukY0E3 /HjPqMCCZG2Owcf3EdN2eWxtT/ZAUJYi8CtzEq72e1zLQ6f63xsnGdA4524YhrmNweFwRKigk5g2U zMbY7KrcqVxN386PDr9LWthXU0td6KS8b9pyjM1aEQBgPrcBs63DZc5IL3Wvr+DcNYt8=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mm9L2-0001Sd-GD for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 07:50:08 +0100 Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2021 07:50:04 +0100 Message-Id: <87tugf9qoz.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #50177 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 50177 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) close 50177 quit From unknown Sun Jun 22 11:41:24 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2021 12:24:10 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator