Subject: bug#50136: 28.0.50; A problem with rx-let expansion

From: Mattias Engdegård <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 14:38:40 +0200

23 aug. 2021 kl. 12.45 skrev Michael Heerdegen <[email-masked]>:

>> (rx-define my-rx-thing (x y &rest more) (eval (expand-my-rx-thing x y more)))

> A good idea, I like it!

The variant

 (rx-define my-rx-thing (&rest more) (eval (expand-my-rx-thing more)))

would also work, at the cost of slightly worse error messages if you pass too few arguments to my-rx-thing.