GNU bug report logs - #50120
27.1; indicate which articles we have piped

Previous Next

Packages: emacs, gnus;

Reported by: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <jidanni <at> jidanni.org>

Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2021 11:56:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: wontfix

Found in version 27.1

Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 50120 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 50120 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox

Report forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org, bugs <at> gnus.org:
bug#50120; Package emacs,gnus. (Thu, 19 Aug 2021 11:56:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent to 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <jidanni <at> jidanni.org>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org, bugs <at> gnus.org. (Thu, 19 Aug 2021 11:56:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <jidanni <at> jidanni.org>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: 27.1; indicate which articles we have piped
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2021 19:54:07 +0800

| runs the command gnus-summary-pipe-output

it is great, but unlike articles we save,
there is no mark, however temporary,
showing which articles we piped,
vs. which articles we didn't yet pipe.
Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org, bugs <at> gnus.org:
bug#50120; Package emacs,gnus. (Thu, 19 Aug 2021 13:14:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at 50120 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
To: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <jidanni <at> jidanni.org>
Cc: 50120 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#50120: 27.1; indicate which articles we have piped
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2021 15:13:01 +0200

積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <jidanni <at> jidanni.org> writes:

> | runs the command gnus-summary-pipe-output
>
> it is great, but unlike articles we save,
> there is no mark, however temporary,
> showing which articles we piped,
> vs. which articles we didn't yet pipe.

Piping an article is one of a gazillion things you can do with an
article, so I don't really see the point in marking that action in
particular in the summary buffer.

Closing.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
Added tag(s) wontfix. Request was from Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Thu, 19 Aug 2021 13:14:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
bug closed, send any further explanations to 50120 <at> debbugs.gnu.org and 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <jidanni <at> jidanni.org> Request was from Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Thu, 19 Aug 2021 13:14:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Fri, 17 Sep 2021 11:24:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 3 years and 274 days ago.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.