From unknown Sat Aug 16 14:29:11 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#50106: libtool testsuite failing when LTO is enabled Resent-From: Ondrej Dubaj Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-libtool@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2021 10:10:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 50106 X-GNU-PR-Package: libtool X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 50106@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-libtool@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.162928139229716 (code B ref -1); Wed, 18 Aug 2021 10:10:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Aug 2021 10:09:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54922 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mGIW3-0007j8-Kp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 06:09:51 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:35894) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mGFPo-0002RY-JP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 02:51:10 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49656) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mGFPo-0004Tj-6T for bug-libtool@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 02:51:08 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:38555) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mGFPj-00011M-MH for bug-libtool@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 02:51:07 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1629269462; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type; bh=gUGMOFQxxROA7RvHaI3l2c+BfrPoyKPvTJ3nB543wZ0=; b=as0kp1TYyqMsh5NKLzt7rjlgtmLwj1WvR0lvV+zJjYIS++GqJZ0UOz/Z599OE9UMecWNW7 oLXDvobyrkkwTEKA1gwSegg/3cH/Nco03cuFYW79KdyknXFjYLQl8vPqMZ7NvLkpZE/wRn GIzQ+wuAvWmRjYrYNpThk2eJ0ymnKrY= Received: from mail-yb1-f200.google.com (mail-yb1-f200.google.com [209.85.219.200]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-324-YGGTH2pJMY2pmKJv_udfQw-1; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 02:49:45 -0400 X-MC-Unique: YGGTH2pJMY2pmKJv_udfQw-1 Received: by mail-yb1-f200.google.com with SMTP id j21-20020a25d2150000b029057ac4b4e78fso1852058ybg.4 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 23:49:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=gUGMOFQxxROA7RvHaI3l2c+BfrPoyKPvTJ3nB543wZ0=; b=gjWc1eoZCmBScA5JZg75SdeGbd5Ja4K4ChXh58QoQkLQ2fXg6YRMRrFqtcdc76V7KI X3A8hfTJUwb+yywBbGcvRzh4rBZJKFhUezJARzRHlMUOQAwpyJC5mVxIglm5cxpfSAqd cIA4+rbzgNrypIEY/zG65F6Et237mGlhmvIvkGPVGMGKR7wFUgVEXH2Qj1H4A9+II05O LsJ1MGv9BFAPwGxrjxO3MUe/QN5PVorNFakWjtByMsEu8uQ+BrmmmhCSGs5bWXfYzGKY Yc2h4OSabUrLTJ0pGxEyyY/zEuCL5QV5tk4Em4Zemiy+tlRxM33/M/jqSswMMgQH3zuk 5bDw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531Gb+zggQcpqwv2JSxhVMXlT9J431NUr3Z0Y3h5ZTks0h/IW02R ctj4nB5R5phEGfdlmHNVb8IoF9WHaysyGwl+9PRrkUwgbKsZe8l6+bXfqfAyVUL7xtAB44MNumM mFQg1W1bOpldF50NT2tclfHPcZPaJ X-Received: by 2002:a25:3604:: with SMTP id d4mr9902207yba.523.1629269384699; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 23:49:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJww+O2ZYZgcf98sfU9xfhjltFG8DlJQMqGPYhcI5A4hn35ls+gRIXsW3D06rVNBOeUxjHSIw7SJgKDV6g/KVGc= X-Received: by 2002:a25:3604:: with SMTP id d4mr9902190yba.523.1629269384485; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 23:49:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Ondrej Dubaj Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2021 08:49:33 +0200 Message-ID: Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=odubaj@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e7f57705c9cfd67e" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.205.24.124; envelope-from=odubaj@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -34 X-Spam_score: -3.5 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.7, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, WEIRD_PORT=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 18 Aug 2021 06:09:46 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) --000000000000e7f57705c9cfd67e Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi, experiencing testsuite failures, when LTO CFLAGS contain -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects and are enabled during the build of libtool. I might think in some cases it can be expected, but just to make sure, is it an expected failure? The failed tests are: 67: Link order of deplibs FAILED (link-order2.at:125) 170: Run tests with low max_cmd_len FAILED (cmdline_wrap.at:47) Thank you in advance. Ondrej --000000000000e7f57705c9cfd67e Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
experiencing testsuite failures, when L= TO CFLAGS contain
-flto=3Dauto -ffat-lto-objects
an= d are enabled during the build of libtool.

I = might think in some cases it can be expected, but just to make sure, is it = an expected failure?
The failed tests are:

67: Link order of deplibs                           FAILED (link-order2.at:125)
170: Run test=
s with low max_cmd_len                  FAILED (cmdline_wrap.at:47)

Thank you in advance.<=
br>
Ondrej



<= /div> --000000000000e7f57705c9cfd67e-- From unknown Sat Aug 16 14:29:11 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#50106: libtool testsuite failing when LTO is enabled Resent-From: Ondrej Dubaj Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-libtool@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2021 14:03:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 50106 X-GNU-PR-Package: libtool X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 50106@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-libtool@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.163102337917638 (code B ref -1); Tue, 07 Sep 2021 14:03:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Sep 2021 14:02:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57229 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mNbgg-0004aQ-NR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 10:02:58 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:46650) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mNbge-0004aH-GX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 10:02:57 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54582) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mNbgc-0004ze-Jn for bug-libtool@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 10:02:56 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:46797) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mNbga-00084H-La for bug-libtool@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 10:02:54 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1631023371; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=oWurlNyoo8GjkqBhbv5A+4jv7vPXBKGvrf0ZnfuXd2s=; b=Sjjgv+fROz74C5wHdX2n0RKDzsUp81xnVNcGx2aA2t7MDjjmnUHRYhMrLchHW1BhCt469m 5JNBgCWe1GPOtwRtIvbOhqu66C5CS81wNcRtn1p1Y95954S7IgvtiqOk10unBywoQWUcmN /bTXaODLLXMWz0CVTFmVApAmOKKxvaw= Received: from mail-yb1-f199.google.com (mail-yb1-f199.google.com [209.85.219.199]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-439-4ke7KUZSM5iQIxVR2PV7kQ-1; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 10:02:49 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 4ke7KUZSM5iQIxVR2PV7kQ-1 Received: by mail-yb1-f199.google.com with SMTP id 124-20020a251182000000b005a027223ed9so2774046ybr.13 for ; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 07:02:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=oWurlNyoo8GjkqBhbv5A+4jv7vPXBKGvrf0ZnfuXd2s=; b=YIHzE83fIWvjxr0nSkdEMLYKMqH65TBaZkgT2fx2cNB8CelM44ZSdFRBvCU+iNuEJc YRwaPGPTFI+CvDjwrc5T41ZWF24KWMBoGVOmAp46GPXg72sRIP34HFkqGfa2Lx4rG6/c fgxbhqkx4hrhAS0DRZWhpgYPQKjNTHlUOZ0T+CFEU5XEVOxHxmeupvrZLoXPoOAfiLEw GawYkIqoDD3NpGI1UJfvonxK9r30MxiW6m1uUxfYO4wFHufMt94FemhxAQmivD+2yDq/ T2YZkBDursivpkSFVg+w9UHFhr8QUU1QDLNhJOGAFF2r4J+tOxBd26nhbQPi8v/t+aT8 bGrQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533m2Z4Pwjxxy8mkwgq0/4o3V6180IFN2OCSFJRqhdlisiJFurl9 xF8925PMHCK47xVcI6QGqxud5FFcLZjN4LzA+SbJr2cEv4Hk04J3pcYafWnpiiPlLkLrZDDoL2f uxVZQp2feZUkb2WeemAJtfX5xNpsJ X-Received: by 2002:a25:d109:: with SMTP id i9mr24287629ybg.251.1631023368895; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 07:02:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy+4JOiWQEnNnsN1Mn9dSSjpnxzDn0eWBZhBh3qeqHO2XRKSmEabxQyy3o2nR1KItAD6tsyz5PpuMrgJ99aTJ8= X-Received: by 2002:a25:d109:: with SMTP id i9mr24287605ybg.251.1631023368682; Tue, 07 Sep 2021 07:02:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Ondrej Dubaj Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2021 16:02:37 +0200 Message-ID: Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=odubaj@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000082d53f05cb683892" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.205.24.124; envelope-from=odubaj@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -31 X-Spam_score: -3.2 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.391, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, WEIRD_PORT=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) --00000000000082d53f05cb683892 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Gentle ping On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 8:49 AM Ondrej Dubaj wrote: > Hi, > experiencing testsuite failures, when LTO CFLAGS contain > > -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects > > and are enabled during the build of libtool. > > I might think in some cases it can be expected, but just to make sure, is > it an expected failure? > The failed tests are: > > 67: Link order of deplibs FAILED (link-order2.at:125) > 170: Run tests with low max_cmd_len FAILED (cmdline_wrap.at:47) > > Thank you in advance. > > Ondrej > > > > > --00000000000082d53f05cb683892 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Gentle ping

On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 8:49 AM Ondrej Duba= j <odubaj@redhat.com> wrote:=
Hi,
experiencing testsuite failures, when LTO CFLAGS conta= in
-flto=3Dauto -ffat-lto-objects
and are enabled d= uring the build of libtool.

I might think in = some cases it can be expected, but just to make sure, is it an expected fai= lure?
The failed tests are:

67:=
 Link order of deplibs                           FAILED (link-order2.at:125)
170: Run t=
ests with low max_cmd_len                  FAILED (cmdline_wrap.at:47)

T=
hank you in advance.

Ondrej


<= pre>
--00000000000082d53f05cb683892--