GNU bug report logs - #49980
28.0.50; [PATCH] Should we have project-save-buffers?

Previous Next

Full log

Message #23 received at 49980 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>
To: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru>
Cc: Giap Tran <txgvnn <at> gmail.com>, 49980 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#49980: 28.0.50; [PATCH] Should we have project-save-buffers?
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 10:55:45 +0300

>> It would be nice to have a keybinding for this useful command,
>> as there is 'C-x s', but 'C-x p s' is bound to 'project-shell'.
>> Maybe then to bind it to 'C-x p S'?
>
> If we do end up adding this command, we could move project-shell to 'C-x
> p E', for example, so that we don't spread shell-related commands over
> different letters.

Or to a new prefix map, e.g. 'C-x p x s' with mnemonics "eXecute Shell".

> But see my question in the other email.
> Is there any reason not to just use 'save-some-buffers' (C-x s)?

In bug#46374 we are adding a new option 'project-root'
to 'save-some-buffers-default-predicate' that will allow
'C-x s' to save only files under the same project root.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.