From unknown Mon Aug 18 14:26:11 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#49977 <49977@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#49977 <49977@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: Texlive importer is outdated? Reply-To: bug#49977 <49977@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2025 21:26:11 +0000 retitle 49977 Texlive importer is outdated? reassign 49977 guix submitter 49977 Xinglu Chen severity 49977 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Aug 10 08:20:47 2021 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Aug 2021 12:20:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58634 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mDQkQ-0004mU-SL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 08:20:47 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:33782) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mDQkN-0004mL-72 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 08:20:45 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54934) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mDQkM-00028Q-T8 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 08:20:42 -0400 Received: from h87-96-130-155.cust.a3fiber.se ([87.96.130.155]:42732 helo=mail.yoctocell.xyz) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mDQkH-0001Vg-Jt for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 08:20:42 -0400 From: Xinglu Chen DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=yoctocell.xyz; s=mail; t=1628598031; bh=Qwt0BCWxczGah2J9syANkcng1GGhax6e7Htod3o7Jxw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date; b=qnQZqdvX7hG0RQSFydY1DOIivfwAqpvU6BoqiXKwB81c3+5OF3Eqa0ILiBpR2WUC4 raWSbQXPZV4C3YritLFKd1rPgQ7ehN1znOuLYNV9DJGCf9OPQN9Cx+x02BRqQh8yHI aUJzzsQbH7nS/KZmoXUNMgCMsd3hw7R4jBM//9Qg= To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: Texlive importer is outdated? Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 14:20:29 +0200 Message-ID: <87im0do5iq.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=87.96.130.155; envelope-from=public@yoctocell.xyz; helo=mail.yoctocell.xyz X-Spam_score_int: 18 X-Spam_score: 1.8 X-Spam_bar: + X-Spam_report: (1.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD=0.498, FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD_FP=0.386, PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD=1.997, PDS_RDNS_DYNAMIC_FP=0.001, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 1.7 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: [Cc Ricardo since you wrote the texlive importer] In section "9.5 Invoking ‘guix import’" in the manual, there are two examples of runnning the ‘texlive’ importer, but both of them result in incomplete package definitions. Content analysis details: (1.7 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [209.51.188.17 listed in list.dnswl.org] 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)] 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.51.188.17 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD_FP From abused NTLD 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: Ricardo Wurmus X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable [Cc Ricardo since you wrote the texlive importer] In section "9.5 Invoking =E2=80=98guix import=E2=80=99" in the manual, ther= e are two examples of runnning the =E2=80=98texlive=E2=80=99 importer, but both of th= em result in incomplete package definitions. =2D-8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- ~/src/guix$ ./pre-inst-env guix import texlive fontspec following redirection to `https://ctan.org/xml/1.2/pkg/fontspec'... command "svn" "export" "--non-interactive" "--trust-server-cert" "-r" "5126= 5" "svn://www.tug.org/texlive/tags/texlive-2019.3/Master/texmf-dist/source/= latex/fontspec" "/tmp/guix-directory.O5HIN3/svn" failed with signal 11 guix import: warning: Could not determine source location. Please manually= specify the source field. (package (name "texlive-latex-fontspec") (version "2.7i") (source #f) (build-system texlive-build-system) (arguments '(#:tex-directory "latex/fontspec")) (home-page "http://www.ctan.org/pkg/fontspec") (synopsis "Advanced font selection in XeLaTeX and LuaLaTeX") (description "Fontspec is a package for XeLaTeX and LuaLaTeX. It provides an automa= tic and unified interface to feature-rich AAT and OpenType fonts through th= e NFSS in LaTeX running on xetexXeTeX or luatexLuaTeX engines. The package= requires the l3kernell3kernel and xparsexparse bundles from the LaTeX3 dev= elopment team.") (license lppl1.3c)) =2D-8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- =2D-8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- ~/src/guix$ ./pre-inst-env guix import texlive --archive=3Dgeneric ifxetex following redirection to `https://ctan.org/xml/1.2/pkg/ifxetex'... command "svn" "export" "--non-interactive" "--trust-server-cert" "-r" "5126= 5" "svn://www.tug.org/texlive/tags/texlive-2019.3/Master/texmf-dist/source/= generic/ifxetex" "/tmp/guix-directory.GjfISH/svn" failed with signal 11 guix import: warning: Could not determine source location. Please manually= specify the source field. (package (name "texlive-generic-ifxetex") (version "0.7") (source #f) (build-system texlive-build-system) (arguments '(#:tex-directory "generic/ifxetex")) (home-page "http://www.ctan.org/pkg/ifxetex") (synopsis "Am I running under XeTeX?") (description "A simple package which provides an \\ifxetex conditional, so that othe= r code can determine that it is running under XeTeX. The package requires = the etexe-TeX extensions to the TeX primitive set. Please note, that ifxet= ex is now part of iftexiftex.") (license lppl1.3c)) =2D-8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- When looking at the CTAN page for =E2=80=98ifxetex=E2=80=99[1], it says tha= t the source in located in /macros/generic/iftex, but I tried a few paths for the archive, and they all result in an incomplete package (same warning as above). * /macros/generic/iftex * macros/generic/iftex * /macros/generic/iftex/ifxetex * macros/generic/iftex/ifxetex In general, I have rarely been able to successfully import a CTAN package using the texlive importer, without the =E2=80=98source=E2=80=99 fi= eld missing, perhaps it needs an update? --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJJBAEBCAAzFiEEAVhh4yyK5+SEykIzrPUJmaL7XHkFAmESbw0VHHB1YmxpY0B5 b2N0b2NlbGwueHl6AAoJEKz1CZmi+1x5o4EQAIdwbcDcoKL5mna194aIirLqztXx fEdQsJwHh3T352J98yRT/ZqBsrOTPMjT1AOrBSdzdM2Goo1bBzxgCljSMal/wCXP l7M/1Oc1WpNT093BODYGYiF9xjHD8xcsMfrmJd5XCD0+cuEy39/6e4sjineZgJ7G UoVdoGFmcrZ5J3Fmtmg++LMflZot1a/+3jgz0JnA9z214OF36HgAolJzkZWq2a1P 6VTi/WT8Jb8B4gvvOZDcFWHTBXwMdBLz8k3vX4bHHF+grUdx56gMbKX44kxeMcCI 5ztMuTkDnphZ15Vein0VSuslJ+RTVPUFeSvyfxUrStzgebiDiglDWs/CqTy/Kswx dUhwmxblFQxHD/ZHu0UxEHhRuTJVGdfh67mfCmzyQQfLDZ6kn7yBTrV8T8RxUx84 QRLocEPbW3GSx4EZAWBykJ1OrsAzfQ5TaBkZL1pRRim+IJ0tJbYAa7DoNrsE6Hwy X2YHV6C1HHk2W+6xn6ok36xTjPSX/K6I3AKLZSy0z9r7htGXjqmaDahBwuJ36IfN Ro45BP42popn38BX5hneF/L+lQyHupb7Y+YvgeQrc9Nt18IkOB9bq4UBT0y05Va0 k2e86t9gNS9VowwtwLu+BlkT8CbAfrqnS/jRce1804jki9f2kHITBJljZt1rMc3g +3CR9CNqiBKqmIin =pI0+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Aug 10 08:45:59 2021 Received: (at 49977) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Aug 2021 12:45:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58669 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mDR8o-0005P5-UA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 08:45:59 -0400 Received: from sender4-of-o51.zoho.com ([136.143.188.51]:21152) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mDR8l-0005Os-1x for 49977@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 08:45:57 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1628599551; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=cyyPDwOpDSbWBtZW9kIljNgeFOAZxsbbaxrzECvJZvae5q0JG4E8QTaLKM7M4nyc5RhVVUPna8F0KSzVQfyjvEUtuG9NfZTLumAXESVX2JT+mmXXgfAC/6iTtAX9JLU1Ugs9QpPTMS69cj1b+ugEvDz970X/tgKxluUZF2/soF8= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1628599551; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:To; bh=ZoKRkjRIE7gxjYroFTxLdJFfTxqUSKPgxHI6vRP72Qo=; b=XgE4YvES/QQb12eDlsc+Jwjie/h8KmKQ/aORtFiFwHHyi5WsBSpLfzJdE6X5OdwP0cGUgZZHeUNiMv3cpGZcZHKv0WTeyegOLFPCW7kTjErZMn4nrCUtzblcZbOMTOZFGMXU/CAwkPAj6rivIeHNO53Jnoi5SCDg/dW65oRpU3E= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass header.i=elephly.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rekado@elephly.net; dmarc=pass header.from= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1628599551; s=zoho; d=elephly.net; i=rekado@elephly.net; h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-reply-to:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=ZoKRkjRIE7gxjYroFTxLdJFfTxqUSKPgxHI6vRP72Qo=; b=HukiUCE0OWbaxNk1z7oKlpZZd+gn02GeVoV3QE/VKOF+VJPXovWTlqQjj0T2rBCk FD4BjpSw4c3Y64Mpqc0/9rqFcL3TqQ14OUDr1DN1/riE0XVdHqY+PUPkzfykGPIFok1 Vv0A8nhHWKc5uxt3JP9Nqjyov5WJGD4eNCYKezM8= Received: from localhost (p54ad4e3a.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.173.78.58]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1628599549340948.6415678493919; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 05:45:49 -0700 (PDT) References: <87im0do5iq.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> User-agent: mu4e 1.4.15; emacs 27.2 From: Ricardo Wurmus To: Xinglu Chen Subject: Re: Texlive importer is outdated? In-reply-to: <87im0do5iq.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> X-URL: https://elephly.net X-PGP-Key: https://elephly.net/rekado.pubkey X-PGP-Fingerprint: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 14:45:45 +0200 Message-ID: <87a6lplb7q.fsf@elephly.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-ZohoMailClient: External X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Xinglu Chen writes: > [Cc Ricardo since you wrote the texlive importer] In the future please use the X-Debbugs-Cc header instead of Cc, so that Debbugs can put me on Cc *after* it has assigned a bug number. Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [136.143.188.51 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [136.143.188.51 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 49977 Cc: 49977@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) Xinglu Chen writes: > [Cc Ricardo since you wrote the texlive importer] In the future please use the X-Debbugs-Cc header instead of Cc, so=20 that Debbugs can put me on Cc *after* it has assigned a bug=20 number. > In general, I have rarely been able to successfully import a=20 > CTAN > package using the texlive importer, without the =E2=80=98source=E2=80=99 = field=20 > missing, > perhaps it needs an update? Correct. It=E2=80=99s not useful at this point. I have worked on and off= =20 again on a new TeX Live importer, but it=E2=80=99s not quite ready yet.=20 I=E2=80=99ll try to resume work on it soon. --=20 Ricardo From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Aug 10 10:01:13 2021 Received: (at 49977) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Aug 2021 14:01:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60152 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mDSJd-0000Jl-BE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 10:01:13 -0400 Received: from h87-96-130-155.cust.a3fiber.se ([87.96.130.155]:53300 helo=mail.yoctocell.xyz) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mDSJa-0000Bb-LH for 49977@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 10:01:12 -0400 From: Xinglu Chen DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=yoctocell.xyz; s=mail; t=1628604061; bh=Mo5xJH8lPcpEzt4Ge/6QqsFlsSQ4pZ0jU08MDfPc1nA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=M9x7LISqLgtmxeOC5Rpge6QZCpmNmA/79Ljob+3iEgJLF3r/uPbVQFF5GcIOvCTky 78pQ59bweVPY2t+LQMzw79NkTXtBmIWpVDMdnNDdHK15y6V2VOQB3adwasSXJsra3u 2Z85Ai6xQoPeh0GPbRxLDkUNDML/PWBJMhVy5UCA= To: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: Texlive importer is outdated? In-Reply-To: <87a6lplb7q.fsf@elephly.net> References: <87im0do5iq.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> <87a6lplb7q.fsf@elephly.net> Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 16:00:57 +0200 Message-ID: <87fsvho0va.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 2.9 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Tue, Aug 10 2021, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > Xinglu Chen writes: > >> [Cc Ricardo since you wrote the texlive importer] > > In the future please use the X-Debbugs-Cc header instead of Cc, so > that Debbugs can put me on [...] Content analysis details: (2.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD 0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS 0.0 PDS_RDNS_DYNAMIC_FP RDNS_DYNAMIC with FP steps X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 49977 Cc: 49977@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.9 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Tue, Aug 10 2021, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > Xinglu Chen writes: > >> [Cc Ricardo since you wrote the texlive importer] > > In the future please use the X-Debbugs-Cc header instead of Cc, so > that Debbugs can put me on [...] Content analysis details: (2.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD 0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS 1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager 0.0 PDS_RDNS_DYNAMIC_FP RDNS_DYNAMIC with FP steps --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Aug 10 2021, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > Xinglu Chen writes: > >> [Cc Ricardo since you wrote the texlive importer] > > In the future please use the X-Debbugs-Cc header instead of Cc, so=20 > that Debbugs can put me on Cc *after* it has assigned a bug=20 > number. Ah, I didn=E2=80=99t know about that. >> In general, I have rarely been able to successfully import a=20 >> CTAN >> package using the texlive importer, without the =E2=80=98source=E2=80=99= field=20 >> missing, >> perhaps it needs an update? > > Correct. It=E2=80=99s not useful at this point. I have worked on and of= f=20 > again on a new TeX Live importer, but it=E2=80=99s not quite ready yet.=20 > I=E2=80=99ll try to resume work on it soon. That=E2=80=99s great to hear, looking forward to it. :-) --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJJBAEBCAAzFiEEAVhh4yyK5+SEykIzrPUJmaL7XHkFAmEShpkVHHB1YmxpY0B5 b2N0b2NlbGwueHl6AAoJEKz1CZmi+1x517IP/1XjEU8oVzKqOjVY687DhfCIqdpT gyDPJ364bBkDw/cZtwF6jzsIySL9kQjcjV6N8Gl+oz9kPFZ83zzSp5H4KXxojg9b vhlZoPXl96MksI+DCSajXuJXz5ZkD6OQBl+OmRkC1GZW0+0ya0zY3QcECA6WyXbt lqnV1YT2PlxvD79LVEavX83AGkj0Qj9Y04MpiERFWxb5aQdtEWsbqtlutC1QrRvu QSLYEjCLOXKjqB9AvDgQkxkpKypYAFlCnhPIZXgcoq1Y50WMeorhZTDMJMfu+Uyi vXI1InQ7/8RjZNmZjHvZU7dH6oFT12Y2vhp75eilP5LmMTCmrbrdPkZ3TEFWswH/ LLyArYnWI8f+wHXTL9ATREunIIpVN4svhRi/NhtNbPCbRaRvWOD2BPb5D+36cW5D aMeQPsbeRvI9fT2WcL3ta/C+L4OCGfPK5JR0BxyKy6JFsMcT/Tw8NZ6s+JNyf4kL josi1S60JA4emeMPUCLSmXU+JHHVZpX2d3y86Rk5+eI3ErfqhMMsWW2dYchmYWJ0 3Wr+3tZxl++AmeXWb9mzMrBqIqxA7SMtvAuXiJIIhyfCyskHpxX3uAi/vls+lxlM H3IIEuGF/rtvSwqtHncS0GEfxeiZE9GLNQepTQQA5WnHTQpg2EhaI8nCJNgvvDcU tXuv44WwLgPDknxA =jcTC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Aug 18 22:53:04 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Aug 2021 02:53:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57864 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mGYAy-0000VB-1u for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 22:53:04 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-f169.google.com ([209.85.222.169]:45996) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mGYAv-0000Uh-Pb for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 22:53:03 -0400 Received: by mail-qk1-f169.google.com with SMTP id o123so5535004qkf.12 for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 19:53:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:message-id:to:from:subject; bh=nz/EFOmlgycstU/mjzoYUsVt1yFkDf5x+/6hwKM0Xg0=; b=KyjPTzkLhVQJhFI2P2Oh6+AuiQwwGMGB7Sozc2zbM3uQ+dG1a9Z0NRx4wSfJgrMuyE uG3ivufiw9T6G3vemMsRSR9QRWXYiiAWh19E/sKyMLSQsJEF4OLPXhCNxcDmtSWx8k2H MY7fp/2DMsfOrb2qIK1booao6gwwWUhEJc9edTmjYQSH8znuuSiABdgKmj/0sI9Jgw/Q +MrqMfFZgCFrEOWOMPgcJvc8ie1lYIuFuzSHW/J1RuzQEXYG+VN+VGbyCVEOiqDWHI05 Cw8asQQl7V1VIPRgK6QG/Ch0UivZuxUfjJ7Cb/AANU8W+CnacIH7c3bWzt79P8dVMToV QPZg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:message-id:to:from:subject; bh=nz/EFOmlgycstU/mjzoYUsVt1yFkDf5x+/6hwKM0Xg0=; b=PbvOKtFHKWr35mJvxWAdXBLeMXpzk2woUa0BiF4ClI8peFbkneUHGDBVOK312pULtn MJGY8sdI6nOMKs2MtsBGI7J1W5Jhd60vxYN+2PMy7+7V06EI1ZLbK/Mrwc75omMOpkKX gB7LOAuNx1vSe+wP6CZt5XQeMkFIs22s0O1ulmgKP/l8E+q7nK8qI327Lc5PQDSxZ6R4 6Qvm/45krbXibX49GmrS3O87cxUorwUsNS9UqocorIp/0bL3VgeAms1PZ7Jw027qnoJw x0UL/VrN5mymtC5MR8D9rhtgMbwPmpGXE3XWP31q3bi90AzlsuW3UIJb+FSpCH2GTmuN 7Uow== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532x8cJFczZFOFYLvMaJaHGl6iEliMc0s7BK0wUz5oD3QC/DB++Q 1aoM9f/QZYxQgGZVKeM7t1CZEPXJYg8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxrRL3WKWEDS8JbLBPFm0rTlqfkMaFO4iV6XdPKHx4IPz5/tKbMU5lxEdLjq5ihANfWkgUpXg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:2006:: with SMTP id c6mr1480384qka.337.1629341575975; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 19:52:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hurd (dsl-236-123-187.b2b2c.ca. [207.236.123.187]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a9sm993020qkk.82.2021.08.18.19.52.55 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 18 Aug 2021 19:52:55 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2021 22:52:54 -0400 Message-Id: <87bl5uw3g9.fsf@gmail.com> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Maxim Cournoyer Subject: control message for bug #49977 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) merge 49977 45656 quit From unknown Mon Aug 18 14:26:11 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2021 12:24:07 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator