From unknown Tue Jun 17 01:50:30 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#49968: Fwd: issue website creates invalid comment expectations Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Fran=C3=A7ois-Ren=C3=A9?= Rideau Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2021 18:57:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 49968 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 49968@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.162853539515113 (code B ref -1); Mon, 09 Aug 2021 18:57:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Aug 2021 18:56:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57779 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mDARs-0003vc-0R for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Aug 2021 14:56:35 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:46120) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mDA0M-0003Gc-6I for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Aug 2021 14:28:07 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51044) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mDA0L-000588-Uh for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Aug 2021 14:28:05 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-x529.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::529]:37614) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mDA0I-0006eb-KX for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Aug 2021 14:28:05 -0400 Received: by mail-ed1-x529.google.com with SMTP id g21so26072242edb.4 for ; Mon, 09 Aug 2021 11:28:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mukn-io.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=i9K30nAeXtN3yDBytaoV18UoZlmCUqcifYoBpha8Uis=; b=y11CK5nzwXGFrtcC8haiG8BKneSPeQYJzK9xrk3inE0agwcyp5zvEkQnmmJy+NzcqV NstZpKAftPWGYpKcS2nTg4OmjTzWtHw+x0wPT9dR6CLdMMPAI2QRJVdOB+K6aLmzf69d klWEpySVH84O2yAQac20d2QbcD80sI5vrAygGSdEGE68fH0kxwgx+HVeygTpkcWJ1hs6 uDfM0yeuJrRLKs2Xfx4wnK8ww/Cyr9QNv7z16xdSOeGvX4CM47uXpOgT0vmM+qLx4bqT A2j34WeG16yS8tlOC7DkCZ2iGVyncDE1XAaa9GC3G+kf7RQrCH4WwNCdzwHJY8Exnbfn txCw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=i9K30nAeXtN3yDBytaoV18UoZlmCUqcifYoBpha8Uis=; b=o2TwrCaHnipOejSIXuc8i4fgPy3BeTxDEWQ71JQnH6Ib5o2zB7vleS0knxiKQ0n7Gb a+oscTCASJ+VtN7nCCh2c3+gaJwG/q/yQyyfEvV2jariP2ulgSmHcU3EIH+Fcs5MHlxQ AlBfS0ZG2CYv+2lzlCsqCcN9OQFzT88fJao2VenCUW0vu4ceoV7YBlJW0bGYOYSNdAE9 pQnUfwtLsTgXzvHjuO2DPLD7O9DNND49ZXfR+UMRuWDt2CWjNL0igwQXTCeNDvw7Wenl 9tzZifMPBjpBkCFZQxuS8z5oOjApFdinFcOze76tG0VttLioltjjMk9xKc3yCsd2EEzn J+Zg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5329+5ZRDKz5WP4Sd6iQz6BgeAgMU9e7lyaqcnKJzyhE7QjrFmdG wLQRfyVaxQxt2J6zbQ9KwPR1jfeh/Szx6rMhH8c9bUx/AOk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwPDlw78ANhKhldD35aOcBijtx+VZlmNdUt59n8aOSkshGD4ZMJIUjHqNWQt1btlHT5UblqpP1VaG/lhcXaXHQ= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1395:: with SMTP id b21mr30964323edv.119.1628533681051; Mon, 09 Aug 2021 11:28:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: =?UTF-8?Q?Fran=C3=A7ois-Ren=C3=A9?= Rideau Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2021 14:27:50 -0400 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: none client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::529; envelope-from=fare@mukn.io; helo=mail-ed1-x529.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 09 Aug 2021 14:56:30 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) When viewing an issue on the website https://issues.guix.gnu.org/ the web interface allows you to post a comment, what more without authentication. Unfortunately, I am told by ropstat and podiki[m] on irc.libera.chat #guix that web comments don't actually work in their experience. If this option cannot be fixed in a timely fashion, it should not be offered at all. Otherwise, it only creates deep frustration in users, and maybe even lost comments depending on what client they use. The same web interface also, correctly, invites users to instead send mail to @debbugs.gnu.org =E2=80=94 however, the same helpful IR= C users tell me that the mail is manually reviewed by a human moderator and may take up to a day to show up. This as such is perfectly fine, but does deserve mention as part of the same message on the web interface, otherwise it will once again create wrong expectations from users, frustration, messages sent multiple times, and more work for both users and moderators. PS: also, several of my attempts to post comments via the web form failed with an unhelpful error message when posting "There was an error submitting your comment!". At some point I conjectured that it was due to my using an accent in my name "Far=C3=A9", but one of my attempts with that name did end up with "Your comment has been submitted!". This is moot considering the above issue, but may become important if the resolution is to fix web comments. From unknown Tue Jun 17 01:50:30 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#49968: Fwd: issue website creates invalid comment expectations References: In-Reply-To: Resent-From: John Kehayias Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 15:23:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49968 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: "49968@debbugs.gnu.org" <49968@debbugs.gnu.org> Reply-To: John Kehayias Received: via spool by 49968-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49968.162860893430763 (code B ref 49968); Tue, 10 Aug 2021 15:23:02 +0000 Received: (at 49968) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Aug 2021 15:22:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60456 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mDTa2-000807-AI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 11:22:14 -0400 Received: from mail2.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.22]:23972) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mDTZx-0007zp-6J for 49968@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 11:22:13 -0400 Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 15:22:00 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail; t=1628608922; bh=dy6tXT9P6NZR0MgWcpumW1+4ocWunFKHAF7jXQiqjiU=; h=Date:To:From:Reply-To:Subject:From; b=LCf7Po3Vqwj366ZWW5h+UK9hKcc0o/eC7JMrzlS6RhPWOD2uJdnAjwYhgZORTWHSf 52ukE0825SqBgfNMSeBNzoxnoI68+RA/HFX98cVpb3Gbt6GqvT5TWHVIUciFZuttvY 6i+vmBz1cY6xJqfKD/CpPdiMMUK4NdGa5uQEmb5U= From: John Kehayias Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on mailout.protonmail.ch X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) (I think the bug title should be "comments sent via issues.guix.gnu.org dis= appear" as they seem to get swallowed by the server) I sent a comment just a few minutes ago via the webform, that got the messa= ge that was successful. I'll check back to see if it appears later, but hav= e not had it work in the past. Hope this helps if anyone is checking some logs for what is happening with = the web comment suggestion. From unknown Tue Jun 17 01:50:30 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#49968: Fwd: issue website creates invalid comment expectations Resent-From: Maxime Devos Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 15:31:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49968 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: =?UTF-8?Q?Fran=C3=A7ois-Ren=C3=A9?= Rideau , 49968@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 49968-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49968.162860945831714 (code B ref 49968); Tue, 10 Aug 2021 15:31:02 +0000 Received: (at 49968) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Aug 2021 15:30:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60462 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mDTiQ-0008FL-4h for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 11:30:58 -0400 Received: from albert.telenet-ops.be ([195.130.137.90]:57192) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mDTiJ-0008F7-R2 for 49968@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 11:30:52 -0400 Received: from ptr-bvsjgyjmffd7q9timvx.18120a2.ip6.access.telenet.be ([IPv6:2a02:1811:8c09:9d00:aaf1:9810:a0b8:a55d]) by albert.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp id frWl2500j0mfAB406rWmgX; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 17:30:46 +0200 Message-ID: <5a811d2835b3335afde69029ddb0eec30f41e7f4.camel@telenet.be> From: Maxime Devos Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 17:30:40 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-xhmG9++NEa+pszg+CwqL" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telenet.be; s=r21; t=1628609446; bh=xXPShqf5G4cqK8OiAzb49h992i0lxrV8CBG3E6hxVcc=; h=Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=f/voUT8+ivVJjyZScN5L40fqbshG0J5AaLv3BUcr5/WLAb4KdCIr0OzF1U+VUzQEg vsDoJlRnMa3Axz99x2bOkXU0kKIo6VBDUPQ3pKX1roqh3TLH77WKNTi652pj4cqov5 IXzAqbVzqi69ogp45MOr/kX5JM+/9ka8LvvRRCrXwt7BoMcooK5SxICD76OWwJ8WQ9 rP0AVdiVbq60xg3Dy3SpFAl7rHdOtZZZ8vYtIGhDEY8Sebj1bEx3uzSkhXEd8J8wlW a6GGx9p7K8ZmhUlgB7Az1yTHhrL2YeBpQIOLIBRu6pgchM5RT+vVUlRjFerrtz3+vG 0nWTm6dCEOB1g== X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) --=-xhmG9++NEa+pszg+CwqL Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > [... mumi =E2=80=98send comment=E2=80=99 interface doesn't work ...] Some time ago, I received a copy of the logs and Ludovic and I found out what causes comments to be swallowed: . Ludovic has a suggestion on how to fix it. The source code is at , if anyone is interested in fixing it, or just disabling the comment interface. Greetings, Maxime --=-xhmG9++NEa+pszg+CwqL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iI0EABYKADUWIQTB8z7iDFKP233XAR9J4+4iGRcl7gUCYRKboRccbWF4aW1lZGV2 b3NAdGVsZW5ldC5iZQAKCRBJ4+4iGRcl7ozUAQCxPdtRs53XP3BXgEwZQozVUECy MikiBPV9bHVh4nknbwD/ZwqEVpC2/ziSV5YExsbi3/oDyimveR9lD8NPJ42s7AE= =hF/u -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-xhmG9++NEa+pszg+CwqL-- From unknown Tue Jun 17 01:50:30 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#49968: Fwd: issue website creates invalid comment expectations References: In-Reply-To: Resent-From: John Kehayias Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 17:47:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49968 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: "49968@debbugs.gnu.org" <49968@debbugs.gnu.org> Reply-To: John Kehayias Received: via spool by 49968-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49968.162861759614347 (code B ref 49968); Tue, 10 Aug 2021 17:47:01 +0000 Received: (at 49968) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Aug 2021 17:46:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60783 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mDVpg-0003jE-Df for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 13:46:36 -0400 Received: from mail-4317.protonmail.ch ([185.70.43.17]:22434) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mDVpa-0003is-74 for 49968@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Aug 2021 13:46:30 -0400 Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 17:46:17 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail; t=1628617579; bh=i4AE38DWzKKrepYcnDW6i6GgKNUzCD04U3DCJhbcsOQ=; h=Date:To:From:Reply-To:Subject:From; b=FiumL6LG3QgwSSqlhsKuLBzjGrxW+SFtX8VxL8iCrizK9Q8jklGkfUbJOSmNT9uvC DybS/pbb3hP1xME4zZBQLt9FudnCbfuICgYxwkneMxPEZ79Nd6iazixCY32//X+Nc1 plVKxzh3yalHwQp0346vKuGHEF5jAr6yydsUTkOA= From: John Kehayias Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on mailout.protonmail.ch X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi Maxime, I took a quick look, but I'm not seeing how the proposed fix works: there i= s already that line for defining mu-debug in the only file that uses mu-mes= sage-send...? (Perhaps this should be sent to that original issue, I can se= nd it again there if that is helpful.) If there is not a relatively quick fix, I would vote for disabling the comm= ent submission until it can be fixed. Otherwise, we're losing comments with= no indication to the submitter. John From unknown Tue Jun 17 01:50:30 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#49968: Fwd: issue website creates invalid comment expectations Resent-From: Maxime Devos Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2021 22:08:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49968 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: John Kehayias , "49968@debbugs.gnu.org" <49968@debbugs.gnu.org>, 49295@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 49968-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49968.162923807123787 (code B ref 49968); Tue, 17 Aug 2021 22:08:02 +0000 Received: (at 49968) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Aug 2021 22:07:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54364 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mG7FP-0006Ba-Ch for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 18:07:51 -0400 Received: from laurent.telenet-ops.be ([195.130.137.89]:38072) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mG7FM-0006BM-Fk for 49968@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Aug 2021 18:07:49 -0400 Received: from ptr-bvsjgyjmffd7q9timvx.18120a2.ip6.access.telenet.be ([IPv6:2a02:1811:8c09:9d00:aaf1:9810:a0b8:a55d]) by laurent.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp id im7m2500C0mfAB401m7miE; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 00:07:47 +0200 Message-ID: <93b5944e604258145ff800329382806217a278d7.camel@telenet.be> From: Maxime Devos Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2021 00:07:35 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-ZEYK3AFXno1BLpYuTEIG" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=telenet.be; s=r21; t=1629238067; bh=biSJUfZGakf20XcjVfwxKe7p2/zY27QpuNLsKIlh7a4=; h=Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=ApYxMc1dx0QQTDvFZa2csGlTHvwFkfMGJLYkOIEeojvw5UTA7JxFy3lh+g4igq4ND 4hDNy/mxhkmnBjHficJ5c35sa8xlicdo/dkfLPm8/myf95pqRE6GjFZhUXHLOHTG93 YSlEirsl14De7yHqFeshfgH+BoC7aq0BEqHIG46vibn6yODyh3sJv/uIBcidk06+GJ fGtwFHDoriQibLM2y2GwcC7HUMBvim4+Wq+QrNsDXUNBhoX29m4t5UCv7v/3jfhEjZ JQu1zITsr3W38ieuAx5dhLiIwj4eO63vWOyQJa1t/hCO0b9qwUm2UI8s+ire2/crCw NH+/5zF8ac06g== X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) --=-ZEYK3AFXno1BLpYuTEIG Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable John Kehayias via Bug reports for GNU Guix schreef op di 10-08-2021 om 17:4= 6 [+0000]: > Hi Maxime, >=20 > I took a quick look, but I'm not seeing how the proposed fix works: there= is already > that line for defining mu-debug in the only file that uses mu-message-sen= d...? > (Perhaps this should be sent to that original issue, I can send it again = there if that > is helpful.) =E2=80=98the current module=E2=80=99 is whatever (current-module) evaluates= to. It is not necessarily the module wherein 'mu-message-send' is used. IIUC, every time a (define-module ([...])) form is encountered, (current-module) is set to [...], or something like that (details might be a little different). It works for stand-alone scripts and in the REPL I guess, but otherwise it's a very cumbersome interface. This interface should be changed (in mailutils) IMO. >=20 > If there is not a relatively quick fix, I would vote for disabling the co= mment > submission until it can be fixed. Otherwise, we're losing comments with n= o indication > to the submitter. nckx has done that recently. Pages on now end with =E2=80=98Commenting via the web interface is currently disable= d.=E2=80=99. Greetings, Ma --=-ZEYK3AFXno1BLpYuTEIG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iI0EABYKADUWIQTB8z7iDFKP233XAR9J4+4iGRcl7gUCYRwzJxccbWF4aW1lZGV2 b3NAdGVsZW5ldC5iZQAKCRBJ4+4iGRcl7oNAAPwLpdr8KUfRd5KppISaepG80WGu uYWUmcVA4E5ZG+VaDwD/UfRAvdbPkmLPmbUqwr2aJfWtulRnfDZ3u0/DVBk+fQQ= =ql7V -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-ZEYK3AFXno1BLpYuTEIG-- From unknown Tue Jun 17 01:50:30 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#49968: Fwd: issue website creates invalid comment expectations Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 14:04:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49968 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Maxime Devos Cc: 49968@debbugs.gnu.org, =?UTF-8?Q?Fran=C3=A7ois-Ren=C3=A9?= Rideau Received: via spool by 49968-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49968.16305050007105 (code B ref 49968); Wed, 01 Sep 2021 14:04:02 +0000 Received: (at 49968) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Sep 2021 14:03:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38722 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLQpk-0001qW-Jm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 10:03:20 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:42600) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLQpj-0001qJ-3L for 49968@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 10:03:19 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:50440) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mLQpc-00072A-6j; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 10:03:12 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=48812 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mLQpb-000240-UG; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 10:03:12 -0400 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= References: <5a811d2835b3335afde69029ddb0eec30f41e7f4.camel@telenet.be> Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 16:03:10 +0200 In-Reply-To: <5a811d2835b3335afde69029ddb0eec30f41e7f4.camel@telenet.be> (Maxime Devos's message of "Tue, 10 Aug 2021 17:30:40 +0200") Message-ID: <87pmts75r5.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi, Maxime Devos skribis: > Some time ago, I received a copy of the logs and Ludovic > and I found out what causes comments to be swallowed: > . Ludovic has a suggestion > on how to fix it. > > The source code is at > , > if anyone is interested in fixing it, or just disabling > the comment interface. Tobias disabled the comment interface a couple of weeks ago: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix/maintenance.git/commit/?id=3Df8dee= be7e9b00db1971ff3d32c78eaef3acb6864 Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Sep 01 12:44:50 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Sep 2021 16:44:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38941 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLTM2-0008Lr-GR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 12:44:50 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53330) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLTM1-0008LZ-DK for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 12:44:49 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:57190) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mLTLw-0007G6-1D for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 12:44:44 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=48816 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mLTLv-0006Sb-PA for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2021 12:44:43 -0400 Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 18:44:41 +0200 Message-Id: <87o89c6y9y.fsf@gnu.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: control message for bug #49295 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) merge 49295 49968 quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Feb 08 13:10:13 2024 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Feb 2024 18:10:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33588 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rY8qj-0005AM-Fa for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Feb 2024 13:10:13 -0500 Received: from sail-ipv4.us-core.com ([208.82.101.137]:48486) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rY8qh-0005AA-LL for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Feb 2024 13:10:12 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; s=2017; bh=XrIgDZ7mZ0dQp6T wRe7sjm8y5ZfkPOnCmJm9zs1kVlM=; h=date:cc:to:from; d=lease-up.com; b=UW FEa0Qy5KCV5arELu1Oppbrps+ZoO0kX1j/CvHU6uDn7no8sztU/JtzGCpIS/JaNVKKRylP ISGarjW/EZyDRt+vvrbIMPWt6HeswWxYQOu6VnPCrE6wp4NJWdK0G5SdYBcZh2NOAHEuQ3 PjhhxpX0UZnQSkN+1JWhJteksPBqo= Received: by sail-ipv4.us-core.com (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 5de564b4 (TLSv1.3:TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256:256:NO) for ; Thu, 8 Feb 2024 18:09:55 +0000 (UTC) From: Felix Lechner To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2024 10:09:55 -0800 Message-ID: <87h6ii6d58.fsf@lease-up.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: reassign 65858 mumi reassign 65809 mumi reassign 49295 mumi reassign 64833 mumi reassign 54204 mumi reassign 68920 mumi reassign 55765 mumi reassign 65923 mumi reassign 63507 mumi reassign 60226 mumi [...] Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available. 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header 0.2 NO_SUBJECT Extra score for no subject X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) reassign 65858 mumi reassign 65809 mumi reassign 49295 mumi reassign 64833 mumi reassign 54204 mumi reassign 68920 mumi reassign 55765 mumi reassign 65923 mumi reassign 63507 mumi reassign 60226 mumi reassign 63936 mumi reassign 60951 mumi reassign 66027 mumi thanks From unknown Tue Jun 17 01:50:30 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#49968: Fwd: issue website creates invalid comment expectations Resent-From: Maxim Cournoyer Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-mumi@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2025 06:05:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49968 X-GNU-PR-Package: mumi X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 49295@debbugs.gnu.org, 49968@debbugs.gnu.org, Maxime Devos Received: via spool by 49968-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49968.174150026220183 (code B ref 49968); Sun, 09 Mar 2025 06:05:02 +0000 Received: (at 49968) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Mar 2025 06:04:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57745 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tr9lu-0005FT-8F for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 09 Mar 2025 01:04:22 -0500 Received: from mail-pj1-x1030.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::1030]:58555) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tr9lp-0005F0-14; Sun, 09 Mar 2025 01:04:17 -0500 Received: by mail-pj1-x1030.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2ff6ae7667dso6228661a91.0; Sat, 08 Mar 2025 22:04:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1741500250; x=1742105050; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=5u+q+l73av/+6+ihG+8jbnDKFcjMVzSrE3yBsaOmDm4=; b=jxESmwwGUxRyF3V5Zqbfh8SPUXu9RRrcJrNHgrY2N4FwyOs4n6ZpfUp1s32XfXgnUr lrY8K2A49BeIUj0yUWsI5zBGXAL0W24u5uqKcI0sD3ufMS0YN3iONoagQhWt9EhZufkX 99LX4eMNMl3dHSs2mS9VWbyu78gY0/3VrJCDMXb5+1IhF4dDCH+AfZjqOlBmQ1vU/ylh pUJttFHjQ9oOdX36DaPuXsIKhdvJ6swmtPphHB6W5kDmQhFL5j+ASwgZoITj+4A9+3u3 9O/3PpCEFCld3fl3sS0LFQNYHqYSdmyQEKlyluIbi/87XGvWZd4naF/XbnDZJ9aqHp6g l1Nw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1741500250; x=1742105050; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=5u+q+l73av/+6+ihG+8jbnDKFcjMVzSrE3yBsaOmDm4=; b=HRHm48clq3K0QByixlGoKJ7Iv6Mj9Wt9t7BnET1TE1WxvA6IFKhaTEfuqQZClTRxbP Mt5/Ub3Koiu3l9JOitLAHil8KkX/+SGPIO4SrhU0+wFzZBTM+WPaDsPNqGbM+tF5hUm4 NUG88WFn5AC7MtW/NWqt05E+h5ul2MmRYUscapsCSy6BUR1Z5wlBEMEOtFVs9oL3mX3B X40TG7TsN7uRLn9mkGSllYUrVY0zTO2buUYNRDcuqjE7NeLpjnP9uQqNT5LcVzc6PrXi Y7aR/Ouk9CJP8VAYzAuIfPzSeWR9QermLlBpaqIkOBohXykw0S22prMvlajxplKtjFhO hiVA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCU1ivwuyplvxnt7gwNpDUEXJEEfriIr6BDdE0KX8LwCHEYnre7zQTC/vMccEg2phOm+3TpKH2A=@debbugs.gnu.org, AJvYcCXnm8PgTFfklu+gAEABXXVCfpF4URXDm6oI8YcKxG354WXNs/JW5T7Ds2nVNgAOe4jUkQRLWQ==@debbugs.gnu.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yzm//61A6517uJxtoOTNOyFGgrbOQfynH67ZIcwVZC+d/EEMLCF Q0N4k/oGQZhuIzk1cJgjTVRU/L3fFer6R1HRrisI5szgdJICgp1UjGuFy0ps49LpZQ== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvCpeQxckVBWF5KgZRRt/sVc8nz+v+dhMkauEom0YAm5CsDB/wQg3S63nfSaRo 3Ikq25VtQ2OHDuYjDvNCjaRHbVfZVjhC/9VO8pssXKicII4VcGxv356jpFmYfuI3JkXGaybpP28 BuupKoQIY68r7/H1a+RyPAlff11Ybkj+V/yaXQsTxNcBjEbHRVPYCEHsiwKb+VFdZKdHJf4DIY9 +ube13ONXPt55ygWtduMSTptq4aY4eRZqIZw9ZjLDGfejXxqhzLZCU9P4vctEeUiWTJ1RLnqpIB jBPZl5vfwamRZVmeB/l4bgtxvb5CFQ61TEp1lz0e2io= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGXg213vt4ElS5NSUrLeFafB10l5T7Si9naUSF6svGZMxhBfbHLb7iHqCEq8fGG2f/l7vNA3w== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:3c08:b0:2fc:3264:3657 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2ff7cd45c1cmr18235018a91.0.1741500250479; Sat, 08 Mar 2025 22:04:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from terra ([2405:6586:be0:0:83c8:d31d:2cec:f542]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 98e67ed59e1d1-2ff4e7ff96esm7499733a91.35.2025.03.08.22.04.08 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 08 Mar 2025 22:04:09 -0800 (PST) From: Maxim Cournoyer In-Reply-To: <87fsuo55qv.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?="'s message of "Wed, 01 Sep 2021 23:46:16 +0200") References: <3eac711a3ecf6ddfb0d2c796e7c203f17b1bcd09.camel@telenet.be> <878s2fj04c.fsf@gnu.org> <87fsuo55qv.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2025 15:03:56 +0900 Message-ID: <871pv6viyb.fsf_-_@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi Ludovic, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > Hi, > > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s skribis: [...] > I pushed a patch to fix this in Mailutils in commit > a5fb1f4eeb7563bd8519660c452a45afecd296c6, and also submitted it > upstream. > > I guess we could try re-enabling the comments via the Web interface of > mumi? Since this feature has been broken repeatedly with nefarious consequences (silently disappears user reported issues!), I think we should come up with a test for it, if we want to re-enable it, so that we can ensure it keeps working in the future. --=20 Thanks, Maxim