GNU bug report logs - #49965
Correct Input type for Common Lisp packages

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Charles <charles.b.jackson <at> protonmail.com>

Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2021 17:20:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #17 received at 49965 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Charles <charles.b.jackson <at> protonmail.com>
To: Guillaume Le Vaillant <glv <at> posteo.net>
Cc: 49965 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [bug#49965] Correct Input type for Common Lisp packages
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 23:39:39 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
> I think it's the philosophy of GNU Guix to use references to the store

You're right, I see now: "propagated-inputs is useful is for languages that
lack a facility to record the run-time search path". Common Lisp has
asdf:*central-registry*. It still seems to me that propogated inputs is
more intuitive and is more portable to guix on forgein linux distributions.
I have a Centos system with guix package manager, and I had to install every
dependency manually for some packages.

Also it still doesn't fully work for me. I deleted my custom init-file.
Attatched is my shell session where I tryto use the sbcl-cl-str package.
In short: package cannot be found in ad-hoc environment; package is found
if installed, but is compiled with an newer version of sbcl: weird, but also
probably unrelated.
[script (application/octet-stream, attachment)]

This bug report was last modified 3 years and 283 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.