From unknown Tue Aug 19 21:02:55 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#49878: Emacs Tarball Should Include Uninstall Script Resent-From: Abdorhman Ayman Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2021 17:44:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 49878 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 49878@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: "bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org" Reply-To: Abdorhman Ayman Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.162809903013729 (code B ref -1); Wed, 04 Aug 2021 17:44:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Aug 2021 17:43:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45077 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mBKvm-0003ZL-1A for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 13:43:50 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:32984) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mBK1Z-00023V-4Y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 12:45:45 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57942) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mBK1T-0000BC-4W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 12:45:40 -0400 Received: from mail-0201.mail-europe.com ([51.77.79.158]:41928) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mBK1K-0007Kr-AM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 12:45:37 -0400 Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2021 16:45:09 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail; t=1628095511; bh=Nvk4qFXi5XUpy9yRHaBBuITF8432aMPtB5P6glWjdEw=; h=Date:To:From:Reply-To:Subject:From; b=A7RdI3KdBanNQFmcnSnrskE9DgXc3yfsyfGwJPh932VwW0wdREyRr04fqX+j93S9e 2j6wEKfFpUZ6nDFZ1DgluIiBLaiCZu2QuvdhDYrfOccImpQlZ++G1i0imEBhCEwaCw XcCmB5ohKtZkHofcMve40kDinDMsCJRFQiqT5aq4= From: Abdorhman Ayman Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="b1_Dh80c2F5OhJmVvXQXmKvAbz596tCBon5HQcXxx5UY" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on mailout.protonmail.ch Received-SPF: pass client-ip=51.77.79.158; envelope-from=Abdorhman.Ayman@protonmail.com; helo=mail-0201.mail-europe.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 04 Aug 2021 13:43:48 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --b1_Dh80c2F5OhJmVvXQXmKvAbz596tCBon5HQcXxx5UY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 U29tZW9uZSBvbiBEZWJpYW4gZm9ydW1zIGVuY291bnRlcmVkIGEgc3lzdGVtIGlzc3VlIGFmdGVy IGNvbXBpbGluZyBFbWFjcyAyNy4yIGZyb20gc291cmNlLCBoZSBzdXNwZWN0cyB0aGF0IGhpcyBp c3N1ZSBNQVlCRSByZWxhdGVkIHRvIEVtYWNzLCBvciBtYXliZSBpdCdzIG5vdCwgaXQgZG9lc24n dCByZWFsbHkgbWF0dGVyLCB3aGF0IG1hdHRlcnMgaXMgdGhhdCBoaXMgcmVwb3J0IGJyb3VnaHQg dG8gbXkgYXR0ZW50aW9uIHRoYXQgRW1hY3MgdGFyYmFsbCBkb2Vzbid0IGluY2x1ZGUgYW4gdW5p bnN0YWxsIHNjcmlwdC4gV2UgbmVlZCBhbiB1bmluc3RhbGwgc2NyaXB0IGZvciB1c2VyIGNvbnZl bmllbmNlLgpodHRwczovL2ZvcnVtcy5kZWJpYW4ubmV0L3ZpZXd0b3BpYy5waHA/Zj0xMCZ0PTE0 OTc5OA== --b1_Dh80c2F5OhJmVvXQXmKvAbz596tCBon5HQcXxx5UY Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 PGRpdj5Tb21lb25lIG9uIERlYmlhbiBmb3J1bXMgZW5jb3VudGVyZWQgYSBzeXN0ZW0gaXNzdWUg YWZ0ZXINCmNvbXBpbGluZyBFbWFjcyAyNy4yIGZyb20gc291cmNlLCBoZSBzdXNwZWN0cyB0aGF0 IGhpcyBpc3N1ZSBNQVlCRQ0KcmVsYXRlZCB0byBFbWFjcywgb3IgbWF5YmUgaXQncyBub3QsIGl0 IGRvZXNuJ3QgcmVhbGx5IG1hdHRlciwgd2hhdA0KbWF0dGVycyBpcyB0aGF0IGhpcyByZXBvcnQg YnJvdWdodCB0byBteSBhdHRlbnRpb24gdGhhdCBFbWFjcyB0YXJiYWxsDQpkb2Vzbid0IGluY2x1 ZGUgYW4gdW5pbnN0YWxsIHNjcmlwdC4gV2UgbmVlZCBhbiB1bmluc3RhbGwNCiBzY3JpcHQgZm9y IHVzZXIgY29udmVuaWVuY2UuPGJyPjxicj48L2Rpdj48ZGl2PjxkaXY+PGRpdj48YSByZWw9Im5v cmVmZXJyZXIgbm9mb2xsb3cgbm9vcGVuZXIiIHRhcmdldD0iX2JsYW5rIiBocmVmPSJodHRwczov L2ZvcnVtcy5kZWJpYW4ubmV0L3ZpZXd0b3BpYy5waHA/Zj0xMCZhbXA7dD0xNDk3OTgiPmh0dHBz Oi8vZm9ydW1zLmRlYmlhbi5uZXQvdmlld3RvcGljLnBocD9mPTEwJmFtcDt0PTE0OTc5ODwvYT48 YnI+PC9kaXY+PC9kaXY+PGRpdj48YnI+PC9kaXY+PC9kaXY+PGRpdj48YnI+PC9kaXY+ --b1_Dh80c2F5OhJmVvXQXmKvAbz596tCBon5HQcXxx5UY-- From unknown Tue Aug 19 21:02:55 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#49878: Emacs Tarball Should Include Uninstall Script Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2021 11:10:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49878 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Abdorhman Ayman Cc: 49878@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 49878-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49878.162816177724875 (code B ref 49878); Thu, 05 Aug 2021 11:10:02 +0000 Received: (at 49878) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Aug 2021 11:09:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46064 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mBbFp-0006T9-Dk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 07:09:37 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:52220) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mBbFn-0006St-OQ for 49878@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 07:09:36 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=YkhqkUb04axFqcZfE2l2aHi6U4Pi4PKgNPDgWgZQ4i8=; b=s5JHCAnx5vc1VtBy0Bj5Vpo56L e2R9z3KFpNvfaOzZ/+ygpsZnYndiWetWukIv116J1j17ncxVBFKmA/osISeDa0LaSIJdRit/Su0gm c6BnvxmCZ4/9qZT1kk8MIeUuQUL1DNAPrb4BygE2bRmz95yfW7cTLVxOPyOmfjw8xfDE=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mBbFf-0002vG-0E; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 13:09:29 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2021 13:09:26 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Abdorhman Ayman's message of "Wed, 04 Aug 2021 16:45:09 +0000") Message-ID: <87sfzognbt.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Abdorhman Ayman writes: > Someone on Debian forums encountered a system issue after compiling > Emacs 27.2 from source, he suspects that his issue MAYBE related to Emacs, > or maybe it's not, it doesn't really matter, what m [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Abdorhman Ayman writes: > Someone on Debian forums encountered a system issue after compiling > Emacs 27.2 from source, he suspects that his issue MAYBE related to Emacs, > or maybe it's not, it doesn't really matter, what matters is that his report > brought to my attention that Emacs tarball doesn't include an uninstall > script. We need an uninstall script for user convenience. I'm not sure an uninstall script is practical -- we can't just delete the files with the same names as those we installed, because we don't know whether they're the same ones (or something added later by the user). I've never understood why any user would say "make install" at all -- Emacs works just fine without saying "make install". Users should just run it from where it was compiled. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From unknown Tue Aug 19 21:02:55 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#49878: Emacs Tarball Should Include Uninstall Script Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2021 11:26:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49878 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Cc: 49878@debbugs.gnu.org, Abdorhman.Ayman@protonmail.com Received: via spool by 49878-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49878.16281627482365 (code B ref 49878); Thu, 05 Aug 2021 11:26:01 +0000 Received: (at 49878) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Aug 2021 11:25:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46090 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mBbVU-0000c4-0c for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 07:25:48 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:59114) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mBbVS-0000bs-Ua for 49878@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 07:25:47 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:34142) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mBbVN-0001Zf-6T; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 07:25:41 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4533 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mBbVM-0001Ek-Bs; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 07:25:40 -0400 Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2021 14:25:35 +0300 Message-Id: <83k0l0jfps.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii In-Reply-To: <87sfzognbt.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Thu, 05 Aug 2021 13:09:26 +0200) References: <87sfzognbt.fsf@gnus.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2021 13:09:26 +0200 > Cc: 49878@debbugs.gnu.org > > Abdorhman Ayman writes: > > > Someone on Debian forums encountered a system issue after compiling > > Emacs 27.2 from source, he suspects that his issue MAYBE related to Emacs, > > or maybe it's not, it doesn't really matter, what matters is that his report > > brought to my attention that Emacs tarball doesn't include an uninstall > > script. We need an uninstall script for user convenience. > > I'm not sure an uninstall script is practical -- we can't just delete > the files with the same names as those we installed, because we don't > know whether they're the same ones (or something added later by the > user). We have "make uninstall" -- why isn't that what's being requested here? > I've never understood why any user would say "make install" at all -- > Emacs works just fine without saying "make install". Users should just > run it from where it was compiled. The idea is that after "make install" you can delete the source tree. Also, without installing, the important executables will not necessarily be on PATH, so you cannot easily invoke them without using a full absolute file name. Finally, this is a standard Make target that everyone expects (other packages don't always work 100% correctly when invoked from the source tree). From unknown Tue Aug 19 21:02:55 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#49878: Emacs Tarball Should Include Uninstall Script Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2021 09:39:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49878 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: 49878@debbugs.gnu.org, Abdorhman.Ayman@protonmail.com Received: via spool by 49878-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49878.162824268414722 (code B ref 49878); Fri, 06 Aug 2021 09:39:01 +0000 Received: (at 49878) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Aug 2021 09:38:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49093 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mBwIm-0003pO-2s for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Aug 2021 05:38:04 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:35110) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mBwIk-0003or-1o for 49878@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Aug 2021 05:38:02 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Alglu8jWBF3vyUuGqMjiYNfBGXak9Pr9mDOJsFFtmKA=; b=kvMLBc1QXEiEJBpYcM8Ap6TnGV /C4SfqLjvXBs05oat/Xd6o7VvvDcgXaqpCdK1dJ1EoUEwYkxKDYOL6y9eiv3pyp7dyMSYyL4EZaX0 fWugtbURIoR7uRkweUthXfv6UMZTxw1kic1Rh2Akw1JteKGQ/MWLn5PEvW3NywlqHgxk=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mBwIb-00023j-80; Fri, 06 Aug 2021 11:37:55 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <87sfzognbt.fsf@gnus.org> <83k0l0jfps.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2021 11:37:52 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83k0l0jfps.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 05 Aug 2021 14:25:35 +0300") Message-ID: <87tuk2c3rj.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Eli Zaretskii writes: > We have "make uninstall" -- why isn't that what's being requested > here? Oh, didn't know about that. Hm... Yeah, I guess it should do the trick. But it's not included in the tarball, I think? Which was the request, and I'm still sceptical about doing that, because it looks [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Eli Zaretskii writes: > We have "make uninstall" -- why isn't that what's being requested > here? Oh, didn't know about that. Hm... Yeah, I guess it should do the trick. But it's not included in the tarball, I think? Which was the request, and I'm still sceptical about doing that, because it looks pretty dangerous. >> I've never understood why any user would say "make install" at all -- >> Emacs works just fine without saying "make install". Users should just >> run it from where it was compiled. > > The idea is that after "make install" you can delete the source tree. > > Also, without installing, the important executables will not > necessarily be on PATH, so you cannot easily invoke them without using > a full absolute file name. > > Finally, this is a standard Make target that everyone expects (other > packages don't always work 100% correctly when invoked from the source > tree). That's sort of my point -- there's a ton of software out there that doesn't work unless you install it first. Emacs is not one of those, so people think they have to install it to use it. I wonder whether it'd be practical to put a "Really install? You don't have to" in the "make install" target. Probably not. I think what most people who're futzing around with Emacs git would want is just to have a target that makes some symlinks from /usr/local/bin (or whatever) to the current build directory so that emacs/emacsclient lands in $PATH. I don't think the size of the source matters most, so my guess is that few people delete the source tree after "make install". -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From unknown Tue Aug 19 21:02:55 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#49878: Emacs Tarball Should Include Uninstall Script Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2021 11:12:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49878 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Cc: 49878@debbugs.gnu.org, Abdorhman.Ayman@protonmail.com Received: via spool by 49878-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49878.162824830832691 (code B ref 49878); Fri, 06 Aug 2021 11:12:02 +0000 Received: (at 49878) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Aug 2021 11:11:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49256 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mBxlU-0008VD-4n for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Aug 2021 07:11:48 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55884) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mBxlN-0008Uf-8i for 49878@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Aug 2021 07:11:46 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:32776) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mBxlH-0003E9-UG; Fri, 06 Aug 2021 07:11:35 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4780 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mBxlH-0001wQ-HE; Fri, 06 Aug 2021 07:11:35 -0400 Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2021 14:11:34 +0300 Message-Id: <83k0kyj09l.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii In-Reply-To: <87tuk2c3rj.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Fri, 06 Aug 2021 11:37:52 +0200) References: <87sfzognbt.fsf@gnus.org> <83k0l0jfps.fsf@gnu.org> <87tuk2c3rj.fsf@gnus.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: Abdorhman.Ayman@protonmail.com, 49878@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2021 11:37:52 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > We have "make uninstall" -- why isn't that what's being requested > > here? > > Oh, didn't know about that. Hm... Yeah, I guess it should do the > trick. But it's not included in the tarball, I think? What do you mean by "not included"? It's in the top-level Makefile.in that _is_ part of a release tarball. From unknown Tue Aug 19 21:02:55 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#49878: Emacs Tarball Should Include Uninstall Script Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2021 11:33:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49878 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: 49878@debbugs.gnu.org, Abdorhman.Ayman@protonmail.com Received: via spool by 49878-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49878.162824958019254 (code B ref 49878); Fri, 06 Aug 2021 11:33:01 +0000 Received: (at 49878) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Aug 2021 11:33:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49323 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mBy60-00050U-5I for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Aug 2021 07:33:00 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:36224) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mBy5x-00050C-Ds for 49878@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Aug 2021 07:32:58 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=ttKeo6y5G1A8BCgS7jb4wyCQbds3T1a/Q2UWsDE9uqM=; b=cPcg8WRJHEVBwpo0BQPev05q00 RDRvkCh5h2XKfiyOifkoT17dvmEMcBxy4EC+jrSfvJWFKIdAkssgDPGdhWPA9uSA4mQGskr/pfRVu Osu7HbUTdCZ/gHbW04T6PiOXit3jnSbZNIKWXx+XqGlT7Wa/aUy3HsVik93TJvPAgYX0=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mBy5o-000404-Kc; Fri, 06 Aug 2021 13:32:51 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: <87sfzognbt.fsf@gnus.org> <83k0l0jfps.fsf@gnu.org> <87tuk2c3rj.fsf@gnus.org> <83k0kyj09l.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2021 13:32:48 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83k0kyj09l.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 06 Aug 2021 14:11:34 +0300") Message-ID: <87fsvmajvj.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Eli Zaretskii writes: > What do you mean by "not included"? It's in the top-level Makefile.in > that _is_ part of a release tarball. Duh. Too early in the morning... Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Eli Zaretskii writes: > What do you mean by "not included"? It's in the top-level Makefile.in > that _is_ part of a release tarball. Duh. Too early in the morning... Anyway, I think "make uninstall" should cover the user's request here, so I'm closing this bug report. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Aug 06 07:33:09 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Aug 2021 11:33:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49327 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mBy69-00051E-CS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Aug 2021 07:33:09 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:36242) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mBy67-000512-Oa for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Aug 2021 07:33:08 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=b7xsl7sOZ53FwQj7pkURN5w/tNP+KA1SE7eka6jBgb4=; b=CW9P7jmuMAjR9o9Oxp36Y4vZ+b 9qGsvGrBK/kH+pFn0qLsx4rMYVL+shQiLsguJXvp+zEkibssgiRyFaA/mBOi1gnTYQ46XJ7pONPXD OUGl7QZdA/8j32pixZb5//FmCnTRGjLf/JVIvRfidvMw7mAz6KA/GYK1z3QIv4e20w8Q=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mBy5z-00040M-Vx for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Aug 2021 13:33:02 +0200 Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2021 13:32:59 +0200 Message-Id: <87eeb6ajv8.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #49878 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 49878 notabug close 49878 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) tags 49878 notabug close 49878 quit