GNU bug report logs - #49868
[PATCH 0/2] guix: dune-build-system: Add a profile parameter.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: pukkamustard <pukkamustard <at> posteo.net>

Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2021 08:05:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Julien Lepiller <julien <at> lepiller.eu>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #40 received at 49868 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: pukkamustard <pukkamustard <at> posteo.net>
To: 49868 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: Julien Lepiller <julien <at> lepiller.eu>
Subject: Re: [bug#49868] [PATCH 0/2] guix: dune-build-system: Add a profile
 parameter.
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2021 09:33:39 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
I suggest reverting commit 33a1ec29fa0ad72c61cef13c8af08c847eb399c1
('guix: dune-build-system: Add a profile parameter.') and instead
applying attached patch.

The attached patch sets the '--release' flag instead of '--profile
release'. From 'dune --help':

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
--release
   Put dune into a reproducible release mode. This is in fact a
   shorthand for --root . --ignore-promoted-rules --no-config
   --profile release --always-show-command-line
   --promote-install-files --default-target @install. You should use
   this option for release builds. For instance, you must use this
   option in your <package>.opam files. Except if you already use -p,
   as -p implies this option.
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

I think this is what we want.

Setting '--profile release' was not enough and was causing
inconsistencies with packages that were building with the '-p' flag.

-pukkamustard

[0001-guix-dune-build-system-Put-dune-into-a-reproducible-.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]
[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]

pukkamustard <pukkamustard <at> posteo.net> writes:

> I submitted #50180 to fix builds of ocaml-ppx-hash.
>
> The impact of this seems to be smaller than I feared. Maybe reverting is not necessary.
>
> Still I don't really understand what's going on. I will try and find a concise example and ask the Dune people.
>
> pukkamustard <pukkamustard <at> posteo.net> writes:
>
>> pukkamustard <pukkamustard <at> posteo.net> writes:
>>
>>> For example ocaml-ppxlib builds properly but seems to be broken. Anything depending on ocaml-ppxlib fails with the errors:
>>
>> This is not true. ocaml-ppx-hash fails to build. But other things depending on ocaml-ppxlib seem to build fine (e.g. ocaml-ppx-optional, ocaml-ppx-assert).


This bug report was last modified 3 years and 347 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.