GNU bug report logs -
#4980
23.1.50; In File > Quit GUI, add "Cancel", write "Save", and simplify
Previous Next
Reported by: "Jason A. Spiro" <jasonspiro4 <at> gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 23:10:05 UTC
Severity: minor
Fixed in version 29.1
Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 12:05 AM, Jason A. Spiro <jasonspiro4 <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> When I try to quit Emacs by clicking File > Quit, I see seven choices:
>
> (((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((
>
> Save file foo.txt?
>
> * Yes
> * No
> * View This Buffer
> * View Changes In This Buffer
> * Save This But No More
> * Save All Buffers
> * No For All
>
> )))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
>
> 1. As dak wrote in 2008 at
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/65537/focus=100634 there's
> no Cancel button. "Closing the dialog window happens to achieve that
> ... but it is not really obvious." Please add a Cancel button.
Aggeed.
> 2. For the first choice, instead of writing "Yes", write "Save".
> Usability researchers have found that action verbs are always better
> when a list of choices is provided. I can explain why if you require
> it.
Agreed. There is no reason for yes/no here. Use verbs to make it clear.
> 3. The seven choices act as a confusing way to ask me which files to
> save. Instead, as Joshua Juran <jjuran <at> gmail.com> suggested to me in
> Freenode #macdev, you should use a dialog box like "gedit" uses (
> screenshot at http://omploader.org/vMnQzaw ; download gedit for
> Windows / Mac at http://projects.gnome.org/gedit/ ):
> (((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((
>
> [!] There are 2 document(s) with unsaved changes.
> Save before closing?
>
> Select the documents you want to save:
> | [x] foo.txt |
> | [x] bar.txt |
> | |
> | |
>
> If you don't save, your changes will be lost.
> ________ ______
> [ Close &without Saving ] [ &Cancel ] [________&Save______]
>
> )))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Yes, a dialog box is better. But it should be cross platform. No one
has yet tried to write this for w32. (I do not know for other
platforms.)
> Don't offer view-buffer or view-changes choices in a GUI. You see, a
> GUI should be simple instead of listing every possible choice the user
> might conceivably want. If the user wants to do so, they can click
> Cancel then do so themselves.
Not sure. This is for experienced users also. Fast ways are useful,
but maybe not when using dialog boxes.
This bug report was last modified 3 years and 117 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.