From unknown Sat Jun 14 19:32:21 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#49600: [core-updates] gcc-11 fails to cross-compile from x86_64-linux Resent-From: Thiago Jung Bauermann Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2021 00:05:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 49600 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 49600@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.16264802868872 (code B ref -1); Sat, 17 Jul 2021 00:05:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Jul 2021 00:04:46 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52547 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m4Xoz-0002J2-LJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 20:04:45 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:43958) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m4Xov-0002Ir-43 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 20:04:44 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35676) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m4Xou-0008Bb-UT for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 20:04:40 -0400 Received: from mx.kolabnow.com ([95.128.36.41]:26534) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m4Xor-0003ne-Tl for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 20:04:39 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by ext-mx-out002.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B89AF12C5 for ; Sat, 17 Jul 2021 02:04:33 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kolabnow.com; h= content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :message-id:date:date:subject:subject:from:from:received :received:received; s=dkim20160331; t=1626480272; x=1628294673; bh=fbvSiX7MgmHhzE6Td/Z+8UopA0LCFvVylzS9/P0h1sQ=; b=fYOSd8uc+PtX NcspZBqdVlvq0TdPcZxGMT5vP+648kaxY4fGsXcATXVQ5xtjHFsnHSm6XcfYc2ya vm0f7njX/XzeK9X55W+3F/DqndKvZdMMo0/uxRLl8PVEVi6TzZh9zgBfJS6LvbEc mYNbG84OcmH/v+aTa2/Eg6i0s1bDBXizqZ+sIPwS7+c6S+yLTue3sQu5FsOPfClz XNpMKXvc7/NkuVEufylBMof9YLRCoMYx9UJOBnpPdyVwJhj7FPYlBiHEazWkBiWn 8jVBIRSkamjRmKd/1V19Xa7DIM+whzhalxrRBIQeuNSS6WjZ7PqnOu0qOTUNlWjH C1lelO8K/PHiq3Cd+KqY6a77k63Ncd608ye7gVfrfAxXTkB7HmyDfv25PhraYLjp Fea0fetKRE+VaaR0cXFq/Gvw1umKorDGnrPKVVqcj2x7VzqaDRmSEqE+lUOSmKaF tjHjjDBzV0u4n0EREDHKFSsaJqbLQ1yqxEUFo+ivsWHmcv74OFxl3svaHsF6LVeN h3PDxUP8UFSQp7VhSWBc5AvhYVARtmeIUonsuiEcTYteDOGyKtvejNTuvsLzy+mh 0uVeCFDTisRcuVviPFifj2iWWcQjjX0TjKtPaAPVlab3HxmeFhyw7GVRNUejHzej sMpOPyZUp5s2d49CKIpdXqW4TwWoAUo= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mykolab.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mx.kolabnow.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ext-mx-out002.mykolab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TaS02_KWCWko for ; Sat, 17 Jul 2021 02:04:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from int-mx003.mykolab.com (unknown [10.9.13.3]) by ext-mx-out002.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE05985C for ; Sat, 17 Jul 2021 02:04:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ext-subm002.mykolab.com (unknown [10.9.6.2]) by int-mx003.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65E3750A4 for ; Sat, 17 Jul 2021 02:04:31 +0200 (CEST) From: Thiago Jung Bauermann Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 21:04:24 -0300 Message-ID: <5098239.b5oAXHIL8O@popigai> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=95.128.36.41; envelope-from=bauermann@kolabnow.com; helo=mx.kolabnow.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) Hello, On core-updates (at least as of commit 8456581375cf), the gcc package fails= =20 to cross-compile. This can be seen in the following CI jobs: =E2=80=A2 https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/667365/details gcc-11.1.0, arm-linux-gnueabihf.gcc.x86_64-linux =E2=80=A2 https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/667394/details gcc-11.1.0, aarch64-linux-gnu.gcc.x86_64-linux =E2=80=A2 https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/667452/details gcc-11.1.0, powerpc64le-linux-gnu.gcc.x86_64-linux =E2=80=A2 https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/667481/details gcc-11.1.0, riscv64-linux-gnu.gcc.x86_64-linux =E2=80=A2 https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/667336/details gcc-11.1.0, mips64el-linux-gnu.gcc.x86_64-linux =E2=80=A2 https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/667423/details gcc-11.1.0, powerpc-linux-gnu.gcc.x86_64-linux They all fail with a similar error: =2D-8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- =E2=8B=AE In file included from /tmp/guix-build-gcc-11.1.0.drv-0/build/arm-linux-gnue= abihf/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/move.h:57, from /tmp/guix-build-gcc-11.1.0.drv-0/build/arm-linux-gnue= abihf/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/nested_exception.h:40, from ../../../../gcc-11.1.0/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/excepti= on:148, from ../../../../gcc-11.1.0/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/eh_exce= ption.cc:26: /tmp/guix-build-gcc-11.1.0.drv-0/build/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libstdc++-v3/inc= lude/type_traits:971:25: error: there are no arguments to ?__is_nothrow_con= structible? that depend on a template parameter, so a declaration of ?__is_= nothrow_constructible? must be available [-fpermissive] 971 | =3D __bool_constant<__is_nothrow_constructible(_Tp, _Args...)= >; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ /tmp/guix-build-gcc-11.1.0.drv-0/build/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libstdc++-v3/inc= lude/type_traits:971:25: note: (if you use ?-fpermissive?, G++ will accept = your code, but allowing the use of an undeclared name is deprecated) /tmp/guix-build-gcc-11.1.0.drv-0/build/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libstdc++-v3/inc= lude/type_traits:971:66: error: template argument 1 is invalid 971 | =3D __bool_constant<__is_nothrow_constructible(_Tp, _Args...)= >; | ^ /tmp/guix-build-gcc-11.1.0.drv-0/build/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libstdc++-v3/inc= lude/type_traits:976:45: error: expected template-name before ?::type | ^ /tmp/guix-build-gcc-11.1.0.drv-0/build/arm-linux-gnueabihf/libstdc++-v3/inc= lude/type_traits:976:45: error: expected ?{? before ?8--- In addition to that, arm-linux-gnueabihf.gcc.x86_64-linux has the following error which doesn=E2=80=99t appear on the other arches: no include path in which to search for stdc-predef.h As a side note, gcc-11.1.0 also fails to build on i586-pc-gnu.gcc.x86_64-linux=C2=B9, but with a very different error message, so it appears to be an unrelated problem. gcc-8.5.0 also fails to cross-compile on several arches, but with a different error message as well, so it also appears to be a separate problem. =2D-=20 Thanks, Thiago =C2=B9 https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/667510/details From unknown Sat Jun 14 19:32:21 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#49600: [core-updates] gcc-11 fails to cross-compile from x86_64-linux References: <5098239.b5oAXHIL8O@popigai> In-Reply-To: <5098239.b5oAXHIL8O@popigai> Resent-From: Thiago Jung Bauermann Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2021 00:22:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49600 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 49600@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 49600-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49600.162648127010408 (code B ref 49600); Sat, 17 Jul 2021 00:22:01 +0000 Received: (at 49600) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Jul 2021 00:21:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52575 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m4Y4s-0002ho-FL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 20:21:10 -0400 Received: from mx.kolabnow.com ([95.128.36.41]:59888) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m4Y4m-0002gw-Gn for 49600@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Jul 2021 20:21:09 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by ext-mx-out001.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B70CD95 for <49600@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 17 Jul 2021 02:20:58 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kolabnow.com; h= content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :message-id:date:date:subject:subject:from:from:received :received:received; s=dkim20160331; t=1626481257; x=1628295658; bh=1QsIBZbKl9XQQnt7jZLZ8F0AWyAb0z5fYgfe7lHasZc=; b=0XjiJEpFRpHz OUiGqDexAb4HOXATbDyvmCGSMguR6wSU9YZS0jKU3VCN3V3FU4goXUwSJReR64uZ DdnfnWYN4KDR8VWA2diVPl2Z0CMxRiI+3A3eNkqC9HuUssovAijdYZ5aKzWNoWwR jS4LuYGCChW1fjfpLAA1B4x1DqXoNvGrXA5Kgn74yGnF722kkNB2rW/0o/hOe8ws 8CcUJJNSURui8Z62i/iQIji/3XwAdv233L7fVRSrXpz8bEx+xr6eBryZPxs5XVOq ce1kdHtSkp0LGGKacuMK1mK32qngYg6fWbxv89eHEDisfneMuPRajK1ZnRX5nmbP 7LSs0l3d78953NSZTcH4/5ed+OSBhEzDNRXGGn4uZlx54f2PVW2JA3m9WHEa2Bqd dqy+5YMndozJwxyXEg5Mdj9+TrxS7q2MG6eodoIR80d4Qpe5hEXntTuSO64BMCnA f1kx6KGJ+mHr202b40x9I/eqV1DOuRFglKpQVrd7R/ybS+2hct4Ni76B8jMMbCto 4iPrBIMRsmXbjP+bnmjlfZktkNA3KWbrDwFLvTRC0dBs7ITFedTg1fMksj5d3AOP hxdwIWf6KI0H37+CB95+9KQ0rr/02PI61+ObX2JYw3b0JDULzVj4pwvqQMflkH0m 7aoC5JMVFNG1lXENtFtzHEiyGV7za0I= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mykolab.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mx.kolabnow.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ext-mx-out001.mykolab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XFy2FQTMQGan for <49600@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 17 Jul 2021 02:20:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from int-mx002.mykolab.com (unknown [10.9.13.2]) by ext-mx-out001.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6398C83A for <49600@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 17 Jul 2021 02:20:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ext-subm003.mykolab.com (unknown [10.9.6.3]) by int-mx002.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96A355536 for <49600@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 17 Jul 2021 02:20:55 +0200 (CEST) From: Thiago Jung Bauermann Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2021 21:20:49 -0300 Message-ID: <4050292.s6a4WW2XOq@popigai> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi, There were several commits added to GCC=E2=80=99s =E2=80=98releases/gcc-11= =E2=80=99 branch since=20 the 11.1.0 release, so I wanted to check whether this problem was fixed by= =20 any of them. I applied the patch containing those commits to the gcc-11 package,=20 obtained by running the following on a git checkout of the GCC repo: ``` $ git diff releases/gcc-11.1.0..origin/releases/gcc-11 \ > gcc-11-branch-update.patch ``` At the time, origin/releases/gcc-11 was: 419201f566bb libstdc++: Use function object for __decay_copy helper Unfortunately it didn=E2=80=99t make a difference. =2D-=20 Thanks, Thiago From unknown Sat Jun 14 19:32:21 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#49600: [core-updates] gcc-11 fails to cross-compile from x86_64-linux References: <5098239.b5oAXHIL8O@popigai> In-Reply-To: <5098239.b5oAXHIL8O@popigai> Resent-From: Sam James Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2021 02:03:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49600 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 49600@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 49600-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49600.163046173911536 (code B ref 49600); Wed, 01 Sep 2021 02:03:01 +0000 Received: (at 49600) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Sep 2021 02:02:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35712 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLFZz-000300-Jd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2021 22:02:19 -0400 Received: from woodpecker.gentoo.org ([140.211.166.183]:40772 helo=smtp.gentoo.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mLFZw-0002zm-KR for 49600@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2021 22:02:18 -0400 From: Sam James Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_8618AFAE-D223-4452-AF35-487BB3AD847B"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\)) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2021 03:02:04 +0100 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.13) X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -6.0 (------) --Apple-Mail=_8618AFAE-D223-4452-AF35-487BB3AD847B Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Seem to have hit the same thing in Gentoo (reported as = https://bugs.gentoo.org/811294). Has Guix found a workaround since? --Apple-Mail=_8618AFAE-D223-4452-AF35-487BB3AD847B Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGTBAEBCgB9FiEEYOpPv/uDUzOcqtTy9JIoEO6gSDsFAmEu3xxfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDYw RUE0RkJGRkI4MzUzMzM5Q0FBRDRGMkY0OTIyODEwRUVBMDQ4M0IACgkQ9JIoEO6g SDsb3Af9Gi1jhIgddEUrw/bmcjs+tveIQ72N4/gWEToewvFkm0wQF/AIsRK2XDYb IY845ITJcjkDpIw0vhe48eapNGC4THTuM5zJLD9UYwovIAOZcJO7YaIp03n/BIK3 GkWGHIIXlJGbOX07NuNZ74P3iOaJS6JgDvp3Y4Wmmbn1feMUJmwXdKkVf0dDxeqc M1sI+eabMMpKunBjl4k74B43QS0Hg/GwChl56Q/ZzNhwNxVGOdpGlJMAQFZEH56/ bb5BTN6/pHA3r5a5jX0NzinFw7cqCBCmB/ZtfHK628dBG+fs5aXBtXq4ahmgLCuQ 3mJktJ+5cBKlNnBin4C/wcCvI5xm4Q== =OCcg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_8618AFAE-D223-4452-AF35-487BB3AD847B-- From unknown Sat Jun 14 19:32:21 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#49600: [core-updates] gcc-11 fails to cross-compile from x86_64-linux Resent-From: Thiago Jung Bauermann Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 19:09:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49600 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Sam James Cc: 49600@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 49600-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49600.16379537022310 (code B ref 49600); Fri, 26 Nov 2021 19:09:02 +0000 Received: (at 49600) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Nov 2021 19:08:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60570 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mqgZy-0000ay-7u for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 14:08:22 -0500 Received: from mx.kolabnow.com ([212.103.80.153]:11038) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mqgZn-0000aG-RD for 49600@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 14:08:12 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mx.kolabnow.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89C4640F38; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 20:07:57 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kolabnow.com; h= content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:date:subject:subject :from:from:received:received:received; s=dkim20160331; t= 1637953677; x=1639768078; bh=54xxlLxNwJhPF0NyaRWR6dSC1iB57XKtOQz B39aJrRA=; b=6BuZp2Uw96arGuCAsNlQlc6VKJXJa3uXm7mAVF77uYPL4V6TdXw J4qWXeQgFgFeo7rbx23E9j+FU19AhWDpj1Mt99yuRldaceftm98XWS1fq4vymfB8 N+cmUqY7vHUlfLy0wSwP8uWr+YyVxCa6OL+fQQmYcU261xF5telE6VvmLaIOqx94 l6WQwyFPPxtS+mOifnwkFk8KwTyzHJKxHDIPxqlROg90VY2RXK5xWzJtEHmNyZDU ZTHYGMO3ztC+Ij7PCZBso6xUzsiCz0luYi4X4EsM4mMV1tNEVzHPaJ3cUlgNy0cf iaNZETBmo/MhbEcNZ4tvtM0du7oxziC4a5/ZwTRvEN1kCWb2P0PHKrqKl0mTkaRG SXvjOu3gDv7qrEnYfpOVlbOZWtQHoTPnOCgSF2URRd7S3AVeYbmEgrDh0uwHLoEt s3zv2RbS9pkSPykGby8YSRIr8G/pVsXonujS36FRh3wQ9vT3OuJH273R5b9xXpr1 d9se2tEvO8+RJwx/weQ+Gmq4+DniUXas9ehNNztzJYXw/DUQYh7PPsWKBbNv9nQL O+9guXabKRDW4d6hPvFTYeDItPs2t14+PsIRuocroYfB+jYDuWFRnS8nhMuKa0Bh l/8cGQdR/6U/wbYZAy6PO761D3V1o+OwaTEXvCtxXMTml3sxk6aR2Yf8= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mykolab.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.899 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-10 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mx.kolabnow.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ext-mx-out003.mykolab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AAXdvPWBN3Bc; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 20:07:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from int-mx002.mykolab.com (unknown [10.9.13.2]) by mx.kolabnow.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8A8A4047C; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 20:07:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from ext-subm003.mykolab.com (unknown [10.9.6.3]) by int-mx002.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DC1157E8; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 20:07:55 +0100 (CET) From: Thiago Jung Bauermann Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 16:07:48 -0300 Message-ID: <2738209.ljgP1WKL5Z@popigai> In-Reply-To: References: <5098239.b5oAXHIL8O@popigai> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hello Sam, Sorry, I missed your message when you sent it originally and just found it= =20 now. Em ter=C3=A7a-feira, 31 de agosto de 2021, =C3=A0s 23:02:04 -03, Sam James = escreveu: > Seem to have hit the same thing in Gentoo (reported as > https://bugs.gentoo.org/811294). >=20 > Has Guix found a workaround since? No, our cross gcc-11 builds are still hitting this issue. E.g.: aarch64-linux-gnu.gcc.x86_64-linux: https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/1750690/details=20 powerpc64le-linux-gnu.gcc.x86_64-linux: https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/1750748/details riscv64-linux-gnu.gcc.x86_64-linux: https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/1750777/details Though I haven=E2=80=99t worked on this issue since I last reported on it. =2D-=20 Thanks, Thiago