GNU bug report logs -
#49518
28.0.50; electric-pair-mode skip-self fails for single-quotes in python-mode
Previous Next
Reported by: Jim Porter <jporterbugs <at> gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2021 01:33:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Found in version 28.0.50
Done: João Távora <joaotavora <at> gmail.com>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
On 9/18/2021 5:20 PM, João Távora wrote:
> So after having a look at this, I came up with a patch. All tests
> pass, and your original request is granted. Unfortunately, Stephen's
> desired triple-pair behaviour is also lost. However, I think that
> behaviour can be recovered via other more elegant, less accidental ways.
> python.el has 'python-electric-pair-string-delimiter' for triple-pairing
> that doesn't seem to be doing its thing.
>
> Here is the patch. Give it a shot.
>
> diff --git a/lisp/elec-pair.el b/lisp/elec-pair.el
> index d8c377a2ef..b8b8a97651 100644
> --- a/lisp/elec-pair.el
> +++ b/lisp/elec-pair.el
> @@ -198,7 +198,9 @@ electric-pair-syntax-info
> inside a comment or string."
> (let* ((pre-string-or-comment (or (bobp)
> (nth 8 (save-excursion
> - (syntax-ppss (1- (point)))))))
> + (skip-chars-backward
> + (make-string 1 command-event))
> + (syntax-ppss (point))))))
> (post-string-or-comment (nth 8 (syntax-ppss (point))))
> (string-or-comment (and post-string-or-comment
> pre-string-or-comment))
>
Thanks, this patch works for me. It also works fine with my patch in
bug#50538, so there's no conflict there.
> Maybe better less brittle solutions can probably be found within the
> syntax tables framework.
I agree that something less brittle would be nice, but that might be
tricky. I had tried a few options when I filed this bug, but nothing
worked quite right.
As for Stephen's desired behavior, the code snippet I posted above[1]
mostly fixes it (just the `python-electric-pair-string-delimiter' part
is necessary after your patch). However, that code doesn't work right if
`electric-pair-skip-self' is set to nil, so I'd need to be a bit smarter
with the implementation if I wanted to merge it into Emacs. Perhaps
there's an even cleaner solution though.
[1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-emacs/2021-09/msg01509.html
This bug report was last modified 3 years and 246 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.