GNU bug report logs - #49510
[PATCH] gnu: Add PuTTY.

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: terramorpha <at> cock.li

Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2021 19:33:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Leo Prikler <leo.prikler <at> student.tugraz.at>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #8 received at 49510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Leo Prikler <leo.prikler <at> student.tugraz.at>
To: terramorpha <at> cock.li, 49510 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add PuTTY.
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 07:42:21 +0200
Hi terramorpha,

your patch is missing the ChangeLog part of the commit message,
see `info '(guix)Submitting Patches'` for more information.

Am Samstag, den 10.07.2021, 15:31 -0400 schrieb terramorpha <at> cock.li:
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/networking.scm
> b/gnu/packages/networking.scm
> index 19b58501e9..af3082b954 100644
> --- a/gnu/packages/networking.scm
> +++ b/gnu/packages/networking.scm
> @@ -4100,3 +4100,37 @@ on hub/switched networks.  It is based on 
> @acronym{ARP} packets, it will send
>   @acronym{ARP} requests and sniff for replies.")
>      (home-page "https://github.com/netdiscover-scanner/netdiscover")
>      (license license:gpl3+)))
> +
> +(define-public putty
> +  (package
> +    (name "putty")
> +    (version "0.74.0")
> +    (source (origin
> +             ;; (method url-fetch)
> +             (method url-fetch)
> +             (uri "http://www.putty.be/0.74/putty-0.74.tar.gz")
You ought to reuse version here, so that people don't need to rewrite
it when the version changes.  You can use "version-major+minor" to
access the "0.74" part, but I assume this is one of the versions, that
gets patch added to the tarball if it exists.  Such packages too exist
somewhere in Guix, but I haven't found an example in the quick time I'm
typing this reply.
> +             (sha256 (base32 
> "0zc43g8ycyf712cdrja4k8ih5s3agw1k0nq0jkifdn8xwn4d7mfx"))))
Please watch your line length, it normally shouldn't exceed 80
characters.
> +    (arguments
> +     `(#:tests?
> +       #f
Never let #tests? #f stay uncommented.
> +       #:phases (modify-phases %standard-phases
> +                 (add-before 'configure 'go-into-unix/
> +                   (lambda _ (begin
> +                          (chdir "unix")
> +                          #t))))))
> +    (build-system gnu-build-system)
> +    (inputs `(("perl" ,perl)
> +             ("python" ,python)
> +             ("python2" ,python-2.7)
> +             ("pkg-config" ,pkg-config)
> +              ("gtk+" ,gtk+)))
Your formatting generally looks a bit off.  #:phases should go to an
extra line, as should inputs.  #:tests? #f OTOH is okay in one line
with the aforementioned comment.
> +    (synopsis "A graphical @acronym{SSH} and telnet client")
> +    (description
> +     "Putty is a powerful terminal client.  It supports
> @acronym{SSH}, 
> telnet,
> +and raw socket connections with good terminal emulation. It
> supports 
> public
> +key authentication and Kerberos single-sign-on. It also includes 
> command-line
> +@acronym{SFTP} and @acronym{SCP} implementations.")
> +    (home-page "https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/"
> )
> +    (license  (license:non-copyleft
> +              
> "https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/licence.html"
> +              "The putty license"))))
Putty claims, that this is license:expat and it does look like one.

Regards,
Leo





This bug report was last modified 3 years and 307 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.