Subject: bug#495: closed (Re: bug#495: xon-xoff (^S, ^Q) for the *shell* buffer)

From: [email-masked] (GNU bug Tracking System)
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 21:41:02 +0000

Your bug report

#495: xon-xoff (^S, ^Q) for the *shell* buffer

which was filed against the emacs package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to [email-masked].

-- 
495: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=495
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact [email-masked] with problems

Subject: Re: bug#495: xon-xoff (^S, ^Q) for the *shell* buffer
From: Glenn Morris <[email-masked]>
To: [email-masked]
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 17:40:25 -0400
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>

You can try M-x enable-flow-control. See the entry about this topic in
etc/PROBLEMS.

It's not worth Emacs spending any more time thinking about flow-control
in this day and age.

>From [email-masked] Fri Jun 27 12:55:52 2008
To: [email-masked]
Subject: xon-xoff (^S, ^Q) for the *shell* buffer
From: [email-masked]
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 03:55:39 +0800

Gentlemen, we find
C-c C-c comint-interrupt-subjob
C-c C-z comint-stop-subjob
C-c C-\ comint-quit-subjob
But what about
$ stty ...
   start = ^Q; stop = ^S;
Apparently there is no corresponding shell-mode bindings for them.