From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jul 09 15:25:54 2021 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jul 2021 19:25:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59808 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m1w8H-0000jk-UM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jul 2021 15:25:54 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:40666) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m1w8G-0000ja-2z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jul 2021 15:25:52 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48752) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m1w8F-0000lr-P9 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jul 2021 15:25:51 -0400 Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.21]:44605) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m1w8D-0002h3-Nu for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jul 2021 15:25:51 -0400 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F3213200922; Fri, 9 Jul 2021 15:25:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 09 Jul 2021 15:25:46 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s= mesmtp; bh=QfvUMgvpgIRZ37fANYUCkj+JmbVdYmMQjTGVNF4vW9g=; b=H8YbY dlJ4XNLsh6WuYkgnxREYEs6fylgTq3z41sqjeaIYK9Hmmj+wzxx9foCSjaX4g8ws ydT1ohQMnGzctcXkA6t097nKLvz4FGGAy4v4YwswweOuQF1AgXNygnoVCBGAvEVE zC0VT01qhiaoi3BnbsiD9TPYZdF/RhpmWTN3KM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=QfvUMgvpgIRZ37fANYUCkj+JmbVdY mMQjTGVNF4vW9g=; b=Tx14GDY2RNmaTk4tbBohdgnOm5Uu51N9ASlWDN+RxKY5j QH9PawEIpttiHMVZ+TjgKOtBCEdoJPWyS1z/7ZeF3nY4y1SfV2ybUWPkyifQD2xp KM2Wj5Pr5/l45jIw4EziNMtV9FwDmS1NPXNBNU2EWe0r2HxXEjkRiJB73p12Fjlu UXhtwj+vG0X1rTyffijN2gP82AcU3px4E+mbU7KFLpb+6jDuzqQ6Jt5R9pZOm0vk uJk/eLrxDmmIcvssDaOkijTtyEIeZZeRCdhdrxWrE3FbTdGyEmorG7vG0vH4Q8Jv Mx5PS4Ob7uhNglgKbDPjxsyqqxKpjcTQHqdGbsOIA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrtdeigddufeefucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkgggtugesthdtredttd dtvdenucfhrhhomhepnfgvohcuhfgrmhhulhgrrhhiuceolhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhi rdhnrghmvgeqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepffehtdeffedtvdeuieefudeujedvkeehff euieejgfdvteelgeehgeefheehuddunecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghr rghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheplhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvg X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for ; Fri, 9 Jul 2021 15:25:45 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2021 15:25:38 -0400 From: Leo Famulari To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: Duplicate grafting derivations? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Received-SPF: pass client-ip=64.147.123.21; envelope-from=leo@famulari.name; helo=wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) In recent months, I noticed some confusing information during the grafting phase of updating my profiles. While doing `guix package -u .` on a large-ish profile (119 packages), I noticed that webkitgtk is being grafted more than once, like this: ------ applying 25 grafts for /gnu/store/fm6a97lzvy765c1hkk9jixrh0xmc1mwi-webkitgtk-2.32.1.drv ... applying 25 grafts for /gnu/store/j61ikyxngic90mxfg5m2pv3rf6ilpryd-webkitgtk-2.32.1.drv ... applying 25 grafts for /gnu/store/x1j851j0pphfyqh6hnar8b3b7y9i6cr5-webkitgtk-2.32.1.drv ... applying 25 grafts for /gnu/store/zcif8i2b5i66nl59nwfckfqa3x8xwg2k-webkitgtk-2.32.1.drv ... ------ It could be that there is a reasonable explanation for this; maybe there are some variants of webkitgtk that I don't know about. But, I didn't find them at first glance. Does anyone know what's going on here? Is this expected? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jul 09 16:32:15 2021 Received: (at 49498) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jul 2021 20:32:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59844 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m1xAI-0002Js-3B for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jul 2021 16:32:15 -0400 Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.21]:44429) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m1xAD-0002JP-8g for 49498@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jul 2021 16:32:00 -0400 Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D270D32001BB; Fri, 9 Jul 2021 16:31:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 09 Jul 2021 16:31:50 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=famulari.name; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s= mesmtp; bh=+017HEXq98jHRgPgDoo9SqmhnqAIMELf/LFPBQkmEy8=; b=YLKyV foP3oB+Uumfvo7ALBqSgKr1ptYAhbrcZsLUI8326TfbeOggKq15d1deOgDemrZTS zuNWGMvP0/U+eqOSoDZepYkh9mrh1Js3kt10hhXbHLdFBQTOWc/LKPI+tCyAx14m RxIPc3HBNGfSTAv239zo48Zsqb3fiI14iwMa9E= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=+017HEXq98jHRgPgDoo9SqmhnqAIM ELf/LFPBQkmEy8=; b=mkli6bIMusZifVDUBoTqr1nUCnlPV3MTwM5AtrAVkmoSD 9EnzSZiK84ZadWb0pCXLbvIhlq7QG9dl+HEb8LkFl3eSAHDhTq6JH6VMN+AibRU3 2cLllA10FyIEiNM8mXeDr2JL/eG0FeIxiWg4Ur/y1W9tqLWxEGVPP6vRRoPrSJ7p xhjBoKRKRqCe5vQixorxgwj6o9QktO0wl3pS8hVM3AO/Exxjr2VKQFCRBgKiXYVL dyDkdT/9NZ9iOfxT8Gy1fTWrYxwNRnkG+QMVGNbd2ZhYjHDWRvoMwPTUqd5p9Yi9 Ue4ONaT0V+8+TM3vy4o5EZTzaB2dg/+otbRiJ+FHw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrtdeigddugeeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkgggtugesthdtredttd dtvdenucfhrhhomhepnfgvohcuhfgrmhhulhgrrhhiuceolhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhi rdhnrghmvgeqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepffehtdeffedtvdeuieefudeujedvkeehff euieejgfdvteelgeehgeefheehuddunecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghr rghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheplhgvohesfhgrmhhulhgrrhhirdhnrghmvg X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for <49498@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 9 Jul 2021 16:31:49 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2021 16:31:46 -0400 From: Leo Famulari To: 49498@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: Duplicate grafting derivations? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 49498 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) I tried to reproduce this bug now, because the derivations I mentioned are maybe a couple months old (I saved that list back then). However, it seems like grafted derivations are being substituted now... awesome! When did that happen? But it's not easy to try to reproduce the bug.