GNU bug report logs - #49425
[PATCH] guix-install.sh: Prompt for configuring substitutes discovery.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>

Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2021 23:50:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #22 received at 49425-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 49425-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#49425: [PATCH] guix-install.sh: Prompt for configuring
 substitutes discovery.
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2021 23:58:43 -0400
Hi!

Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> writes:

> Hi,
>
> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> skribis:
>
>> +# Configure substitute discovery according to user's preferences.
>> +# $1 is the installed service file to edit.
>> +configure_substitute_discovery() {
>> +if grep -q -- '--discover=no' "$1" && \
>> +        prompt_yes_no "Would you like to enable automatic substitute \
>> +discovery? (yes/no)"; then
>> +    sed -i 's/--discover=no/--discover=yes/' "$1"
>> +fi
>> +}
>
> Indentation is off, compared to the other functions.

Good catch.

> Should the message say a bit more, similar to that in (gnu installer
> newt substitutes)?
>
> Otherwise LGTM!

I went with:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
-if grep -q -- '--discover=no' "$1" && \
-        prompt_yes_no "Would you like to enable automatic substitute \
-discovery? (yes/no)"; then
-    sed -i 's/--discover=no/--discover=yes/' "$1"
-fi
+    if grep -q -- '--discover=no' "$1" && \
+            prompt_yes_no "Would you like the Guix daemon to automatically \
+discover substitute servers on the local network? (yes/no)"; then
+        sed -i 's/--discover=no/--discover=yes/' "$1"
+    fi
 }
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

and pushed as commit 4cbe0127a6.

> Note that someone running “yes | ./guix-install.sh” will now have
> substitutes enabled (whereas it’s off by default in
> <guix-configuration>).  I suppose that’s fine though.

I think it's OK too.  I like to think that someone typing yes |
./guix-install.sh wants the most complete setup, with all the bells and
whistles ("yes, all that" :-)).

Thanks!

Maxim




This bug report was last modified 3 years and 320 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.