GNU bug report logs - #49425
[PATCH] guix-install.sh: Prompt for configuring substitutes discovery.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>

Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2021 23:50:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 49425 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
Subject: [bug#49425] [PATCH] guix-install.sh: Prompt for configuring substitutes discovery.
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2021 16:40:06 +0200
Hi,

zimoun <zimon.toutoune <at> gmail.com> skribis:

>> diff --git a/NEWS b/NEWS
>> index b0647b3700..ad9433a921 100644
>> --- a/NEWS
>> +++ b/NEWS
>> @@ -14,7 +14,9 @@ Please send Guix bug reports to bug-guix <at> gnu.org.
>>  
>>  * Changes in 1.4.0 (since 1.3.0)
>>  ** Package management
>> -   * New 'deb' format for the 'guix pack' command
>> +*** New 'deb' format for the 'guix pack' command
>> +** Distribution
>> +*** The installation script can now configure substitute discovery
>>  
>>  * Changes in 1.3.0 (since 1.2.0)
>>  ** Package management
>
>>From my point of view, this is a good practise. :-)  Especially when
> preparing a new release. ;-)
>
> Now, is it a standard practise?  I mean, is it asked to committers to do
> it more systematically for the changes that require it?

I think we should aim to make it standard practice!

The worst that could happen is that we’d end up with an overly detailed
‘NEWS’, but that’s probably better than the other way around.

Ludo’.




This bug report was last modified 3 years and 354 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.