GNU bug report logs - #49412
[PATCH core-updates] gnu: libdrm: Update to 2.4.107.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Kaelyn Takata <kaelyn.alexi <at> protonmail.com>

Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2021 10:38:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos <at> telenet.be>
To: Kaelyn <kaelyn.alexi <at> protonmail.com>
Cc: 49412 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [bug#49412] [PATCH core-updates] gnu: libdrm: Update to 2.4.107.
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2021 10:24:47 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Kaelyn schreef op ma 05-07-2021 om 15:58 [+0000]:
> [...]
> I'm not familiar with the "--without-tests=" flag and mechanism, but would be happy
> to add a patch for it. I've only recently started using Guix and this is my first
> patch submission (it's a precursor patch from my attempt to update mesa to 21.1.x);
> should I email that patch to 49412 <at> debbugs.gnu.org to make it part of the same issue?

If you mean the 'when tests?' patch, then I'd send it to 49412 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
to keep the libdrm patches together (maybe as a v2 patch series).  If you mean
‘updating mesa to 21.1.1x’, then I'd send that patch to guix-patches <at> gnu.org,
as updating 'mesa' seems much more complicated than only updating 'libdrm'
(see reply by John Kehayias).

There is some documentation in the chapter ‘16 Contributing’ in the manual
on the process (more specifically, the section ‘16.6 Submitting Patches’)
but it doesn't have much advice on when to split patch series ...

Greetings,
Maxime.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 3 years and 291 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.