GNU bug report logs - #49329
[PATCH 00/??] Improve Ren'py package

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Leo Prikler <leo.prikler <at> student.tugraz.at>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#49329: closed ([PATCH 00/??] Improve Ren'py package)
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 11:47:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Thu, 15 Jul 2021 13:46:13 +0200
with message-id <26e29ba3e5a2514d340eab8d49dcb838c4f8224c.camel <at> student.tugraz.at>
and subject line Re: bug#49329: [PATCH 00/??] Improve Ren'py package
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #49329,
regarding [PATCH 00/??] Improve Ren'py package
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
49329: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=49329
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Leo Prikler <leo.prikler <at> student.tugraz.at>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH 00/??] Improve Ren'py package
Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2021 14:39:52 +0200

Hi Guix,

Being one of the first package I've ever contributed to Guix, the renpy
package contains a few mistakes, some of which were fixed over time,
but many of which still remain.  This series aims to address a few of
them.  At the time of writing, I haven't yet finished it, I just want
to claim the bug ID, so that I can 'git send-email' later today.

Thanks

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Leo Prikler <leo.prikler <at> student.tugraz.at>
To: Chris Marusich <cmmarusich <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 49329-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#49329: [PATCH 00/??] Improve Ren'py package
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 13:46:13 +0200

Am Donnerstag, den 15.07.2021, 00:21 -0700 schrieb Chris Marusich:
> Leo Prikler <leo.prikler <at> student.tugraz.at> writes:
> 
> > Am Samstag, den 10.07.2021, 21:44 -0700 schrieb Chris Marusich:
> > > Leo Prikler <leo.prikler <at> student.tugraz.at> writes:
> > > 
> > > > * gnu/packages/game-development.scm (python-pygame-sdl2): New
> > > > variable.
> > > > Inherit package definition from previous python2-pygame-sdl2,
> > > > with
> > > > the
> > > > following additions:
> > > 
> > > Actually, it inherits from python-pygame, right?
> > "Inherit" as in "use the code that was originally written for
> > python2-
> > pygame-sdl2".  Did the inherit field change with this patch?  If
> > so, I
> > should reflect it in the commit message.
> 
> I see now what you mean.  It's fine.
> 
> Personally, I think the word "re-use" would have been clearer, since
> it
> is not possible to confuse it with the "inherit" feature of package
> records.
I've changed the commit message to say "reuse" and pushed this now.  
Thanks!

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.