GNU bug report logs -
#49329
[PATCH 00/??] Improve Ren'py package
Previous Next
Full log
Message #77 received at 49329 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Leo Prikler <leo.prikler <at> student.tugraz.at> writes:
>> From my understanding, the “implemented” plan is described by Maxim
>> here:
>>
>> <https://yhetil.org/guix/87pn1oxv0m.fsf <at> gmail.com/>
> Using this plan as a starting point, I think renpy counts as a non-
> variant package relying on some python2-variant.
>
>> I just want to point that it is less work to transfer a functional
>> and
>> supported by upstream package than to transfer a package starting to
>> have issues. Other said, I think it is easier to find motivation to
>> do
>> the transfer for this previous case than to do some “janitor” work
>> later. For what my opinion is worth. :-)
> Fair enough, I could open up a merge request to have renpy in Guix Past
> "ahead of time", but OTOH I feel like `guix time-machine` offers
> similar benefits. If we're going to *mirror* python packages, because
> they will soon be broken, I think it would also be a good idea to start
> from python2 instead of leaf packages.
I feel like keeping it all in Guix proper but vaguely "moving things
toward Python 3 wherever possible" is the best approach for now. An
approach like the one Maxim suggested in the above link sounds good.
Moving Ren'Py to Guix-Past would be fine, I guess, but I have to admit
it feels a little strange. After all, Ren'Py is neither stale nor
unmaintained. However, some of its dependencies are (like Python 2),
and their plan for upgrading to Python 3 sounds like it will take years.
--
Chris
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
This bug report was last modified 4 years and 39 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.