GNU bug report logs - #49305
Regression regarding #nil in syntax expansions in 3.0.7

Previous Next

Package: guile;

Reported by: Rob Browning <rlb <at> defaultvalue.org>

Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 23:49:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Rob Browning <rlb <at> defaultvalue.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log

Message #10 received at 49305-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Rob Browning <rlb <at> defaultvalue.org>
To: 49305-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#49305: Regression regarding #nil in syntax expansions in 3.0.7
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2025 12:31:51 -0600

Rob Browning <rlb <at> defaultvalue.org> writes:

> In 3.0.7, this:
>
>   (define-syntax foo
>     (syntax-rules ()
>       ((_ x) (eq? #nil x))))
>
>   (foo #t)
>
> began crashing like this:
>
>   ice-9/psyntax.scm:2795:12: In procedure syntax-violation:
>   Syntax error:
>   unknown location: unexpected syntax in form ()

I believe this has been fixed.

Thanks
-- 
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
This bug report was last modified 130 days ago.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.