GNU bug report logs - #49293
[PATCH] isc-dhcp: Fix dhclient-script wrapper when cross-compiling.

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe <at> gnu.org>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#49293: closed ([PATCH] isc-dhcp: Fix dhclient-script wrapper
 when cross-compiling.)
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2021 09:59:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Sun, 29 Aug 2021 11:58:47 +0200
with message-id <87lf4kvag8.fsf_-_ <at> gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#49293: [PATCH] isc-dhcp: Fix dhclient-script wrapper when cross-compiling.
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #49293,
regarding [PATCH] isc-dhcp: Fix dhclient-script wrapper when cross-compiling.
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
49293: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=49293
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos <at> telenet.be>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] isc-dhcp: Fix dhclient-script wrapper when cross-compiling.
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2021 16:13:46 +0200

[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]

This causes many rebuilds, but only when cross-compiling.
This should unbreak Internet access on cross-compiled pinebook
images.

Reported-By: Guest4977 (on IRC)

[0001-isc-dhcp-Fix-dhclient-script-wrapper-when-cross-comp.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

[Message part 6 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe <at> gnu.org>
To: Maxime Devos <maximedevos <at> telenet.be>
Cc: 49293-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#49293: [PATCH] isc-dhcp: Fix dhclient-script wrapper when
 cross-compiling.
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2021 11:58:47 +0200

Hello,

> Yes, indeed.  It seems like the same thing needs to be done for libexec/.dhclient-script.
> Also, I'm not sure if using 'canonical-package' is the right thing.
> I wonder when 'canonical-package' is supposed to be used.

I fixed this issue and pushed it as
7256d9d2049352e9a63594eb558dc44978bd6687.

Thanks,

Mathieu

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.