GNU bug report logs - #49263
Guix weather backtrace

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos <at> telenet.be>
To: Jack Hill <jackhill <at> jackhill.us>, 49263 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#49263: Guix weather backtrace
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2021 00:12:27 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Jack Hill schreef op ma 28-06-2021 om 16:15 [-0400]:
> computing 0 package derivations for aarch64-linux...
> [...]
> Throw to key `numerical-overflow' with args `("/" "Numerical overflow" #f #f)'.

A division by zero problem?
Also, this seems architecture-dependent:

$ guix weather icecat --system=x86_64-linux icecat

2 pakketdistillaties aan het berekenen voor x86_64-linux...
op zoek naar 2 depotobjecten op https://ci.guix.gnu.org...
https://ci.guix.gnu.org
  100.0% substituten beschikbaar (2 van de 2)
  ten minste 355,2 MiB aan narbestanden (gecomprimeerd)
  377,9 MiB op schijf (ongecomprimeerd)
  0,379 seconden per verzoek (0,8 seconden in totaal)
  2,6 verzoeken per seconde

$ guix weather icecat --system=aarch64-linux icecat

0 pakketdistillaties aan het berekenen voor aarch64-linux...
op zoek naar 0 depotobjecten op https://ci.guix.gnu.org...
https://ci.guix.gnu.org
Backtrace: [...]
Throw to key `numerical-overflow' with args `("/" "Numerical overflow" #f #f)'.

Seems like the definition of icecat or some dependency of icecat does
not support aarch64. Anyway, here is a patch. Could you confirm it works?

Greetings,
Maxime.

[0001-weather-Handle-zero-requested-store-items-gracefully.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.