GNU bug report logs -
#49263
Guix weather backtrace
Previous Next
Reported by: Jack Hill <jackhill <at> jackhill.us>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 20:16:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Done: Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Tue, 29 Jun 2021, Maxime Devos wrote:
> Jack Hill schreef op ma 28-06-2021 om 16:15 [-0400]:
>> computing 0 package derivations for aarch64-linux...
>> [...]
>> Throw to key `numerical-overflow' with args `("/" "Numerical overflow" #f #f)'.
>
> A division by zero problem?
> Also, this seems architecture-dependent:
[…]
> Seems like the definition of icecat or some dependency of icecat does
> not support aarch64. Anyway, here is a patch. Could you confirm it works?
Thanks for taking a look. Yeah, I guess it's not a aarch64 problem
per-say, but that it's easier to run into unsupported packages over here.
Yes, with the path applied, I can find out what the weather is:
$ ./pre-inst-env guix weather icecat
computing 0 package derivations for aarch64-linux...
looking for 0 store items on https://ci.guix.gnu.org...
https://ci.guix.gnu.org
unknown substitute sizes
0.0 MiB on disk (uncompressed)
14 queued builds
x86_64-linux: 2 (14.3%)
i686-linux: 10 (71.4%)
aarch64-linux: 2 (14.3%)
build rate: .00 builds per hour
aarch64-linux: 0.00 builds per hour
i686-linux: 0.00 builds per hour
x86_64-linux: 0.00 builds per hour
looking for 0 store items on https://bordeaux.guix.gnu.org...
https://bordeaux.guix.gnu.org
unknown substitute sizes
0.0 MiB on disk (uncompressed)
(continuous integration information unavailable)
Some of the output doesn't quite make sense anymore in the context where
we don't expect to find anything, but this is still much improved.
Thank you!
Jack
This bug report was last modified 3 years and 325 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.