GNU bug report logs - #49245
Enchant dictionaries list not being correctly set, and other minor fixes

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Reuben Thomas <rrt <at> sc3d.org>

Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2021 21:21:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Reuben Thomas <rrt <at> sc3d.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Reuben Thomas <rrt <at> sc3d.org>
Cc: 49245 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#49245: Enchant dictionaries list not being correctly set, and other minor fixes
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 15:13:54 +0300
> Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2021 22:20:10 +0100
> From:  Reuben Thomas via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
>  the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
> 
> I found a bug recently where, when using Enchant as the back-end for ispell.el, spellchecking was locking up
> for some languages.
> 
> This turned out to be the combination of two problems.
> 
> First, ispell-find-enchant-dictionaries was incorrectly merging ispell-dictionary-base-alist into its result. This
> caused the ispell-set-spellchecker-params to fail to add the correct "-d LANG" flag arguments to the list of
> dictionaries that it used to start Enchant, which in turn meant that the process was started as e.g.
> 
> enchant-2 -d francais # rather than -d fr_FR
> 
> and failed to start properly. I have fixed this by simply removing the incorrect code (patch 0003 attached).
> 
> Secondly, ispell.el failed to notice that it had not actually started an Enchant process, and hung while trying to
> read from it in ispell-accept-output. I fixed this by testing that the process is live before trying to read from or
> write to it (patch 0002 attached).
> 
> Finally, while reading the source code I found an ancient comment that is more of a commit message in
> spirit (it explains how the current code came to be that way, rather than explaining something about how it
> works), so I removed it (patch 0001 attached).
> 
> As usual with my infrequent patches, I would appreciate other eyes on them before I install them, if possible.

OK for the first 2 patches, but please don't remove that comment, it
explains something important, and there's no reason to remove it (or
many other similar comments we have throughout our code).

Thanks.




This bug report was last modified 4 years and 20 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.