GNU bug report logs -
#49221
[PATCH 00/13] Add go-1.16 and build with gccgo
Previous Next
Reported by: Sarah Morgensen <iskarian <at> mgsn.dev>
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 06:54:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Done: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
Message #56 received at 49221 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Sat, Jul 24, 2021 at 07:17:28PM -0700, Sarah Morgensen wrote:
> Hi Efraim,
>
> Just following up on this.
Sorry for taking so long to get back to you.
> Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il> writes:
>
> > On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 11:52:55PM -0700, Sarah Morgensen via Guix-patches via wrote:
> >> Hello Guix,
> >>
> >> This patch adds go 1.16, but does *not* make it the default for other packages
> >> which use go (as suggested in [2]). There have been a lot of changes between
> >> 1.14 and 1.16, and while I have fixed many issues, I am sure continued testing
> >> will uncover many more.
> >>
> >> This patch is based on [0], which adds gccgo-10.
> >
> > I've applied the patch, so it should now be available in the main repo :)
>
> Should the following related issues be closed now?
>
> [0] <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/28226> Build go with gccgo
> [1] <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/46380> gnu: gccgo: Add version 10.
> [2] <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/47434> Added Go 1.16.2
> [3] <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/45161> Update go?
Looks like they should be safe to close.
> > My only concern about the patches is that I've been burned before about
> > pushing updates to go packages, where some seem to have insufficient
> > testing and then they'll build and fail. So in the meantime I've pushed
> > the go <at> 1.16 patch.
>
> Is there something specific to be done to sufficiently test them? I'm
> not sure what else to do other than manually testing dependents.
I thought more about it and I went ahead and applied most of them. I
wasn't able to apply the go-github-com-bmatcuk-doublestar one or the
restic patch. Can you resend those?
> Thanks,
> Sarah
Thank you for doing all the work.
--
Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il> אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
This bug report was last modified 3 years and 285 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.