GNU bug report logs - #49221
[PATCH 00/13] Add go-1.16 and build with gccgo

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Sarah Morgensen <iskarian <at> mgsn.dev>

Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 06:54:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #56 received at 49221 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
To: Sarah Morgensen <iskarian <at> mgsn.dev>
Cc: 49221 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#49221: [PATCH 00/13] Add go-1.16 and build with gccgo
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2021 17:03:46 +0300
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Sat, Jul 24, 2021 at 07:17:28PM -0700, Sarah Morgensen wrote:
> Hi Efraim,
> 
> Just following up on this.

Sorry for taking so long to get back to you.

> Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il> writes:
> 
> > On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 11:52:55PM -0700, Sarah Morgensen via Guix-patches via wrote:
> >> Hello Guix,
> >> 
> >> This patch adds go 1.16, but does *not* make it the default for other packages
> >> which use go (as suggested in [2]). There have been a lot of changes between
> >> 1.14 and 1.16, and while I have fixed many issues, I am sure continued testing
> >> will uncover many more.
> >> 
> >> This patch is based on [0], which adds gccgo-10.
> >
> > I've applied the patch, so it should now be available in the main repo :)
> 
> Should the following related issues be closed now?
> 
> [0] <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/28226> Build go with gccgo
> [1] <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/46380> gnu: gccgo: Add version 10.
> [2] <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/47434> Added Go 1.16.2
> [3] <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/45161> Update go?

Looks like they should be safe to close.

> > My only concern about the patches is that I've been burned before about
> > pushing updates to go packages, where some seem to have insufficient
> > testing and then they'll build and fail. So in the meantime I've pushed
> > the go <at> 1.16 patch.
> 
> Is there something specific to be done to sufficiently test them?  I'm
> not sure what else to do other than manually testing dependents.

I thought more about it and I went ahead and applied most of them. I
wasn't able to apply the go-github-com-bmatcuk-doublestar one or the
restic patch. Can you resend those?

> Thanks,
> Sarah

Thank you for doing all the work.

-- 
Efraim Flashner   <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>   אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 3 years and 285 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.