GNU bug report logs - #4922
<control>

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#4922: closed (<control>)
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 16:56:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Wed, 26 Feb 2014 18:55:18 +0200
with message-id <831typzudl.fsf <at> gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#4922: <control>
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #4922,
regarding <control>
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
4922: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=4922
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Per Starbäck <per.starback <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: <control>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 21:58:57 +0100

emacs -q
  C-x 8 RET < TAB RET
completes to "<control>" which inserts \237.

I didn't expect "<control>" to be a valid completion there.

The reason is that control characters have "<control>" in the second field in
admin/unidata/UnicodeData.txt (and \237 is the last such character.

Suggestion: Skip the <control> names in unidata-gen-table.

When I looked around for this I noticed a very minor thing in
ucs-names in mule-cmds.el.
It says
	      (dotimes-with-progress-reporter (c #xEFFFF)
but I think the limit ought to be #xF0000, which is where Plane 15
starts, since dotimes-with-progress-reporter
has that as an exclusive limit. (In practice it doesn't matter. At
least not for the time being.)

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Per Starbäck <per.starback <at> gmail.com>
Cc: xfq <at> gnu.org, 4922-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org, drew.adams <at> oracle.com
Subject: Re: bug#4922: <control>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 18:55:18 +0200

> Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 15:14:49 +0100
> From: Per Starbäck <per.starback <at> gmail.com>
> Cc: Xue Fuqiao <xfq <at> gnu.org>, 4922 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> > And AFAICT it does seem to be fixed.  Should it be closed?
> >
> > http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=16216
> 
> That 16216 is a duplicate of this bug, isn't it? Since it is fixed the
> original is also fixed.

Yes, closing.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.