From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jun 25 01:36:40 2021 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jun 2021 05:36:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44602 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lweW7-0004Dx-UL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 01:36:40 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:49880) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lweW5-0004Dp-Io for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 01:36:38 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39322) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lweW5-0000iy-8V for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 01:36:37 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x52a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::52a]:33298) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lweW1-0008Ft-Ls for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 01:36:37 -0400 Received: by mail-pg1-x52a.google.com with SMTP id e20so6696383pgg.0 for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 22:36:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version; bh=4mxzey7BZTnvkrl/gOFSAaZqdRWaA5WkiujDlaDhGTY=; b=IdG3lnH54ovUBZZ/ze8ny7U1IV9558EkSqa32s6kzb4IOZwaEBLnhruaxPJ386/MXU /DnVUthyxT9S4WKyyinAQ7jwG2AbNbtoGC9jnCNPi6ZcbcfvE4R3iHMPzJZlA8adqwgV KN9VNzdZ6aVw955wcpkcllIrK+2Kgt8jW55VF4oyy4brZyNwV5y1YFTuwPABhTddCwQe 2LI1KtMFal2dFL/CyUFGi04G2m1BAgIpCiwG/tyo7z9fBKAatVWVb182IwSLrcJdAvLG dmEao/5sscA1YkVdSmPqw6YDCKnX9CZaODBeYWVVyzqyL1eR411vfXE3HiTMQQJLwYKA 4LtQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version; bh=4mxzey7BZTnvkrl/gOFSAaZqdRWaA5WkiujDlaDhGTY=; b=FLTQsKGm0zUTn34YBHsSezkPRKC6ukGbdZQJAsO9VRPkWoXgcCdj8JM5zvvLXUsr4s kins+yAvs8uzivohTIgSk5uraw8dOqDoQqqdpsTujkPHSODqpcmeo4h1C1eozMCJwUMg jAiCRLWW+9YM5bAPWKf87HduwKGQUvF+/A+AgZx3OFMCi1/4Jh3lm97emqokNhvML3SK VbFEZBzGJeL6LVIsC2ELXoGXS/7NWQlkTtOk7b6RQmkp3Mw7gMHYa4empHvp/tW2Ujq/ 3ivnIW2CBJC2lvpC1t3S/CwJ0t5TtAdlc7LrBgJH9qJvajfXhkr4W1ieUC1Pdfq1LU94 1Avg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5318ujoLJXc+7q14mcYLcpCkcCMteJsYwMoidle4vQbgPRQnZpyp J8i9CUh7FoRxrvE5SNOyyg0gWgcEvD8QLw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzVnZCm/M+NVVphEhHtqrXorLErKmRDlVXabJ6U5RrXzhBmQby4Z2lVq5sVHdNgvozBCg3nUQ== X-Received: by 2002:a63:af07:: with SMTP id w7mr8143593pge.287.1624599391434; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 22:36:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from garuda-lan ([2601:601:9d01:3f90::24aa]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j15sm4504784pfh.194.2021.06.24.22.36.30 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 24 Jun 2021 22:36:30 -0700 (PDT) From: Chris Marusich To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: texlive-latex-base fails to build: "missing engine: luajithbtex" Message-ID: <87bl7u5yu1.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 22:36:26 -0700 User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::52a; envelope-from=cmmarusich@gmail.com; helo=mail-pg1-x52a.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) --==-=-= Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On powerpc64le-linux, using Guix commit 45dd2b4505095d24e253bd62d74474cad135cf3b (the current tip of core-updates), texlive-latex-base fails to build because the engine "luajithbtex" is missing: =2D-8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- Transcript written on pdflatex-dev.log. fmtutil [INFO]: log file copied to: /tmp/guix-build-texlive-latex-base-5463= 2.drv-0/source/web2c/pdftex/pdflatex-dev.log fmtutil [INFO]: /tmp/guix-build-texlive-latex-base-54632.drv-0/source/web2c= /pdftex/pdflatex-dev.fmt installed. fmtutil [ERROR]: not building luajithbtex due to missing engine: luajithbtex fmtutil [INFO]: disabled formats: 40 fmtutil [INFO]: successfully rebuilt formats: 19 fmtutil [INFO]: failed to build: 1 (luajithbtex/luajithbtex) fmtutil [INFO]: total formats: 60 fmtutil [INFO]: exiting with status 1 error: in phase 'build': uncaught exception: %exception #<&invoke-error program: "fmtutil-sys" arguments: ("--all" "--fm= tdir=3Dweb2c" "--cnffile=3Dweb2c/fmtutil.cnf") exit-status: 1 term-signal: = #f stop-signal: #f> phase `build' failed after 55.3 seconds command "fmtutil-sys" "--all" "--fmtdir=3Dweb2c" "--cnffile=3Dweb2c/fmtutil= .cnf" failed with status 1 builder for `/gnu/store/n3j2vrlm1vb7hy8wf0afy7qv8yd4dcqb-texlive-latex-base= -54632.drv' failed with exit code 1 build of /gnu/store/n3j2vrlm1vb7hy8wf0afy7qv8yd4dcqb-texlive-latex-base-546= 32.drv failed =2D-8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Previously, we have disabled luajittex because "LuaJIT is not ported to powerpc64le* yet": =2D-8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- commit 1a0f4013d33535ed9b8518cfb3ac502f48132fd8 Author: Leo Le Bouter Date: Mon Feb 8 04:47:03 2021 +0100 gnu: texlive-latex-base: Fix compilation on powerpc64le*. =20=20=20=20 * gnu/packages/tex.scm (texlive-latex-base)[arguments]: LuaJIT is not p= orted to powerpc64le* yet. Update replacement 'build phase to add "luajittex" wi= thin the "disabled-formats" list on powerpc64le*. =20=20=20=20 Signed-off-by: Chris Marusich commit e9938dc8f0e081e4407a96502a04ea63f07e5a8c Author: Leo Le Bouter Date: Mon Feb 8 03:13:53 2021 +0100 gnu: texlive-bin: Fix compilation on powerpc64le*. =20=20=20=20 * gnu/packages/tex.scm (texlive-bin)[arguments]: Append "--disable-luaj= ittex" and "--disable-mfluajit" to keyword argument "#:configure-flags" on powerpc64le* because LuaJIT is not ported to powerpc64le* yet. Also set "#:tests?" to "#f" on powerpc64le*. =20=20=20=20 Signed-off-by: Chris Marusich =2D-8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- The attached patch fixes the issue. However, I'm curious about a few things, so I would welcome any input others might have: =2D Is it a problem to disable LuaJIT-related things? Based on what I've found on the Internet, I think it's fine to disable LuaJIT. It looks like luatex and luatexhb are preferred in most cases. It seems that luajittex and luajithbtex alternatives do essentially the same thing as their luatex and luahbtex counterparts, but they run Lua using LuaJIT (just-in-time compilation capability) instead of the regular Lua. In their "Short report on the state of LuaTEX, 2020", Luigi Scarso wrote that luajittex and luajithbtex "should also be considered a research tool in digital typesetting" [1]. So I don't think we lose much by disabling it, especially if it isn't supported on powerpc64le. =2D Will LuaJIT ever support the powerpc64le architecture? Until it does, I guess we can't use LuaJIT on powerpc64le at all, not just for TeX-related stuff. =2D Is it correct to add "mfluajit" to the disabled-formats list, like I do in my patch? It sounds like "mfluajit" is a related to "metafont", but I don't yet really understand what that means. Is it an engine like luajit? Is it correct to include mfluajit in the list of formats to disable in fmtutil.cnf when running fmtutil-sys? I am totally unfamiliar with these tools, so I have no idea. Perhaps it makes no sense to include mfluajit here, even if maybe it is benign to do so. If any TeX wizards out there can clarify this for me, I'd be happy to adjust the patch as needed. Footnotes: [1] https://www.tug.org/TUGboat/tb41-3/tb129scarso-luatex.pdf =2D-=20 Chris --=-=-= Content-Type: text/x-patch Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=0001-gnu-Disable-more-LuaJIT-components-on-powerpc64le-sy.patch Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From=20afdcba86e90a784e3857a27dccb1110165bd2ecd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Chris Marusich Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 21:39:39 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Disable more LuaJIT components on powerpc64le systems. * gnu/packages/tex.scm (texlive-bin)[#:configure-flags]: Add "--disable-luajithbtex" on powerpc64le systems. (texlive-latex-base)[#:phases][build]: Add "mfluajit" to the disabled-forma= ts list on powerpc64le systems. =2D-- gnu/packages/tex.scm | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/tex.scm b/gnu/packages/tex.scm index 7a78563a75..0362067874 100644 =2D-- a/gnu/packages/tex.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/tex.scm @@ -338,6 +338,7 @@ files from LOCATIONS with expected checksum HASH. CODE= is not currently in use. ,@(if (string-prefix? "powerpc64le" (or (%current-target-system) (%current-system))) '("--disable-luajittex" + "--disable-luajithbtex" "--disable-mfluajit") '())) =20 @@ -2688,10 +2689,11 @@ formats.") "platex-dev eptex" "uplatex-dev euptex" "csplain pdftex" "mf mf-nowin" "mex pdftex" "pdf= mex pdftex" "luacsplain luatex" "optex luatex" + ;; LuaJIT is not ported to powerpc64le* yet. ,@(if (string-prefix? "powerpc64le" (or (%current-target-syste= m) (%current-system))) =2D '("luajittex") '()) + '("luajittex" "luajithbtex" "mfluajit") '()) "cont-en xetex" "cont-en pdftex" "pdfcsplain xet= ex" "pdfcsplain pdftex" "pdfcsplain luatex" "cslatex= pdftex" "mptopdf pdftex" "uplatex euptex" "jadetex pdfte= x" =2D-=20 2.30.2 --=-=-=-- --==-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJJBAEBCAAzFiEEy/WXVcvn5+/vGD+x3UCaFdgiRp0FAmDVa1sVHGNtbWFydXNp Y2hAZ21haWwuY29tAAoJEN1AmhXYIkadXWEP/i8Cmuj3YvWdmQZ/MtBn8td0WmlR jlPcqsAzoJC1++eSMM5LtrrVQoDn6pO8AA2uW6T2Yjd2cM+dZhrPREr6p582Ywdn TJPATocrVdUxu11guu1GLb+mw2slEhELHFUslRw1QhHA+IRQXy0RIfYjsU2HI96N DtYPqGxgRK3n6BJgwEQ6XmWHKDBZIFgU67wvJQzK/gFDo7IPJVIXXj36ZkPZUKRr bXqacArW1Nc/sTdG9aLlCz/JyOReAy4A+9ZSWiJbKgOSjrr6zThMC9QH+fyj+Rqg IyeMeneDyHVtmXvCEspcZO+CJ/wQVazi0kXnL825Sifv6S2xFLGdPWy2tjNqIQKs zpWCDirNggY4zeuYwMvHhzXKFV1fUfFalb1t47wgozOzGCDK1Bl+Efg86dSMGjxP MxvYz/pXAZ8KLxKOMX8aKtU30u747UrD6NvagXNlwhWxbHRu9jRQcpRxxKou6cbO zJlLCnWVvg6l20pO4R448LZcFztqEcRs5l2wTBhFA9vwte4OoL3FPbuCivvPJnI5 PdstNO4BG024WJ7uHPCSg+ZnapVZXeXX+9P70l6dx8eFfuGN0J6ZB5Kd+yjxeX/9 LGOGcC5fWhKPZ+mbP+Tm73wdiEJTJl93hczU8n4AgaM185mO2VjJ4Ar9G4qq8Wmt hKF7qDu6LTQMGjz/ =rHfE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jul 07 00:08:44 2021 Received: (at 49218-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Jul 2021 04:08:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50538 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m0yrc-0004dG-86 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Jul 2021 00:08:44 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-f42.google.com ([209.85.216.42]:43586) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m0yra-0004d1-3O for 49218-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Jul 2021 00:08:42 -0400 Received: by mail-pj1-f42.google.com with SMTP id x21-20020a17090aa395b029016e25313bfcso801614pjp.2 for <49218-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 06 Jul 2021 21:08:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent :mime-version; bh=vnndE8q1esOYHiCW+eGaDVCE8PeR/cjE10X5yCk2lP4=; b=lffYygq6VcJUNra2rd+TQnrdNJGxAicybKl5EaCIpTy3Y8U3TFRWS8JT3DCLQw1xqN p/3JY/lFBZnYEva2aQAILEHq20ccq3GrBgWStXCqTqj2qI3EaGujsaCcV1FqQ0Butrih +bJyn3EXXJcGdHHPXx32ymfAiLSe63p550ofED6K+swL/8pDb5g0qWVdnkWyuerfiXBK 42AAS6vlyyhvyUo/PZSK+GnH+f/zFbhNoFRYNhA0paghJDswpeBSJkFdwQEweiYbncC0 ThRByt62ojR/1bMGj/2PIxurbxQqM47df3IvE0o/nHPbO/8iMk2n0PdhnY6T9I5QdyzA xYaw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=vnndE8q1esOYHiCW+eGaDVCE8PeR/cjE10X5yCk2lP4=; b=qs3On56fUyuPkUCAuhLqMVDdgKumYEAO1FIgEHBI0sql8yUrBQ5l2oHEJCH6xvj7IN o7s7vnNBYkd1KvMWSy1ip6JE3J0GOJVye344xKnlWROTrWTri9mLvjV/+ZJ4zptz7L0Y Uw0dyl7WLVNHC+OG1UxKluRgnuuKYhBMwle/xC2E7gYuvuHv+yRcDzx3jM7qJL10/3LH lym9k/eEUDe+8msH5+VzsOCahJdt8xE7ok3ZQJtO9CHdfSc1c+qjJJQTNFvkGl47lcBr 47Pwa4kpdbRA5uuxXTGsGuUasXwqvFKdrLFdom5b10rE91v6xlufzdXsvrolPXb3O8PA oP/Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532QV92/iYgbRfYi4NpPA5hXBBVJ/xYfkZCpvC3+uAQnfmUCSBRu 9QtWCgyIFB/njT6Ok5IT9NouWf/L3PhbxA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwHrnCUjiVWopkl+W2Qbuy217V63xjcUJ/HYFB5FcZ8G4OVXTSav6eZSR0FboWpVi86ap56sQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:aa4a:b029:10e:f98c:2b83 with SMTP id c10-20020a170902aa4ab029010ef98c2b83mr19656641plr.62.1625630915930; Tue, 06 Jul 2021 21:08:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from garuda-lan ([2601:601:9d01:3f90::9985]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u23sm21745287pgk.38.2021.07.06.21.08.34 for <49218-done@debbugs.gnu.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 06 Jul 2021 21:08:35 -0700 (PDT) From: Chris Marusich To: 49218-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#49218: texlive-latex-base fails to build: "missing engine: luajithbtex" References: <87bl7u5yu1.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2021 21:08:30 -0700 In-Reply-To: <87bl7u5yu1.fsf@gmail.com> (Chris Marusich's message of "Thu, 24 Jun 2021 22:36:26 -0700") Message-ID: <87fswqvk8x.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 49218-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I've committed the patch as 68b0e0d511c2873603636e9f783ff59aac4b7612 on core-updates. I'm closing this bug report. Chris Marusich writes: > - Will LuaJIT ever support the powerpc64le architecture? Until it does, > I guess we can't use LuaJIT on powerpc64le at all, not just for > TeX-related stuff. See: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D49220 In short, it does not seem like upstream support for powerpc64le is forthcoming in the near future. But maybe that will change with time. > - Is it correct to add "mfluajit" to the disabled-formats list, like I > do in my patch? It sounds like "mfluajit" is a related to "metafont", > but I don't yet really understand what that means. Is it an engine > like luajit? Is it correct to include mfluajit in the list of formats > to disable in fmtutil.cnf when running fmtutil-sys? I am totally > unfamiliar with these tools, so I have no idea. Perhaps it makes no > sense to include mfluajit here, even if maybe it is benign to do so. > If any TeX wizards out there can clarify this for me, I'd be happy to > adjust the patch as needed. FYI, I found this information about formats and engines: https://www.tug.org/levels.html According to that document, "engines" are "executable binaries which implement different TeX variants", and "formats" are "the TeX-based languages in which one actually writes documents". The config file contains lines like this: # from lollipop: lollipop tex - lollipop.ini # # from luatex: luatex luatex language.def,language.dat.lua luatex.ini dviluatex luatex language.def,language.dat.lua dviluatex.ini luajittex luajittex language.def,language.dat.lua luatex.ini # # from metafont: mf mf-nowin - -translate-file=3Dcp227.tcx mf.ini It looks to me like it's fine to include "mfluajit" in the disabled-formats list. Clearly, some metafont "formats" and "engines" are included in this config file already. That said, adding "mfluajit" to the list does nothing right now, since the config file doesn't actually contain any lines beginning with the word "mfluajit", anyway. And in any case, if "mfluajit" ever does get added to the config file somehow, then surely we would want to disable it for powerpc64le-linux, since LuaJIT is not currently supported on that platform. Therefore, I think it's correct to include "mfluajit" in the disabled-formats list. =2D-=20 Chris --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJJBAEBCAAzFiEEy/WXVcvn5+/vGD+x3UCaFdgiRp0FAmDlKL4VHGNtbWFydXNp Y2hAZ21haWwuY29tAAoJEN1AmhXYIkadBr8QANd3prF28lp/A3FIO/cmUqcr2gFf 3ItULL5tcEaA2gz7WKjI4loB7OY+DOWynj5+cvIIE2y+pmkdCZQ7DrUVMmY7nQ2f SvgbAdmvg9YcZQqFrnyR0c2KhxsgI+00jXMXWydxUWb+GZMNqvd+RJSfz4oPDMsC dNZEt294vVLrhGKBhCkigvopm7FDeZdZKCsYES45+T3BV1HH/xU9rk/xwO9OkeZx NbCJHEgn6yxxM9F6voxy/EeU2zyaSpx8ayo8yi6AVijAq2GBvTenAS2pLRWKBxfN Jjty3W9ebRbO9GsOhzTXraRfKjqemsSUzBN5XBjtYr7epBU15dX0OF65lL4Wa4gg 5nX3ieXKfn25Mhb2Ua7bCbBoRf2eH6PXL5o2bPT+UJCfbX/i/KQeQ0AwXeStmf4f eAdBGPPVVhQeB5J5HUFT5O0+SkAr8EfKqxD1P7UbGtgz50PZcEbAYShfErsAcP84 BK5PZzoSr6irKSIeKQc+n3AYjm530Qw9cG/LnAeGAB+ckiJmrEgVhxYsTtPvAdwI q9rxfAbAnmgpOI9NmTD3KIVxlXgN8LWFU/HjSQo5c3KrZrQgEq4+jxvuvaZAG1KK iaMP9aCm0M6kFwX6vTWAnU4No5+ePLUgnJgcRAHvQcuvlWDNIL4Mezi37Jg43CRq iOb5SvP2wNMt59sO =YP9j -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From unknown Sun Jun 15 08:45:51 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2021 11:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator