From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:16:35 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#49214 <49214@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#49214 <49214@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: dabbrev-expand vs. =?UTF-8?Q?=EF=BC=9A?= vs. : Reply-To: bug#49214 <49214@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2025 10:16:35 +0000 retitle 49214 dabbrev-expand vs. =EF=BC=9A vs. : reassign 49214 emacs submitter 49214 =E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC Dan Jacobson severity 49214 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jun 24 15:31:57 2021 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jun 2021 19:31:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44175 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lwV4u-00027o-UF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 15:31:57 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:43984) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lwV4s-00027a-D5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 15:31:55 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41752) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lwV4s-0002kc-1R for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 15:31:54 -0400 Received: from crocodile.elm.relay.mailchannels.net ([23.83.212.45]:6062) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lwV4i-0003Hs-47 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 15:31:53 -0400 X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35087482812 for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 19:31:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a60.g.dreamhost.com (100-101-162-64.trex.outbound.svc.cluster.local [100.101.162.64]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0E5834827DC for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 19:31:38 +0000 (UTC) X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a60.g.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 100.101.162.64 (trex/6.3.3); Thu, 24 Jun 2021 19:31:40 +0000 X-MC-Relay: Neutral X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost X-Spicy-Daffy: 5edc8d9c23e51e28_1624563100002_4084312866 X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1624563100002:3441445621 X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1624563100002 Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a60.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a60.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD09B8AE68 for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 19:31:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=jidanni.org; h=from:to :subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=jidanni.org; bh=RT7pAXT3vazh+JfjyD URDF+Oy/k=; b=T9tcsn/vAWM5kp6yXr+SQ9iKnAhuShE8PAtSWCxyL3YQAF8vZz JNBjf2INlzkL4PH5gRmWCJvGv5YqEbV3taINwxVMPqNv+dXAJiczgzoNZXCod/Gp psqa+5FmwqLWD1tCwToYe0hoPETI9LDSRUiaz6v1PDi3Wlh59CxcEG3I8= Received: from jidanni.org (114-41-3-170.dynamic-ip.hinet.net [114.41.3.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jidanni@jidanni.org) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a60.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7F989A0A8E for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 19:31:37 +0000 (UTC) X-DH-BACKEND: pdx1-sub0-mail-a60 From: =?utf-8?B?56mN5Li55bC8?= Dan Jacobson To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: dabbrev-expand vs. =?utf-8?Q?=EF=BC=9A?= vs. : Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 03:31:34 +0800 Message-ID: <87pmwbnjop.5.fsf@jidanni.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=23.83.212.45; envelope-from=jidanni@jidanni.org; helo=crocodile.elm.relay.mailchannels.net X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) Unfair! dabbrev-expand only expands boys names 1. =E5=90=8D=EF=BC=9Alaura@nurdsboro.org 2. =E5=90=8D:ralph@nurdsboro.org ... when girls are behind wider colons. Try it: l M-/ r M-/ From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jun 24 15:44:03 2021 Received: (at 49214) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jun 2021 19:44:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44191 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lwVGd-0002Rg-Ij for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 15:44:03 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:35564) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lwVGb-0002R5-Ue for 49214@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 15:44:02 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID :In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=3O9WBCZ+58M0S+dEubZ4muJDTC2liKmmqdeRwaHlGss=; b=QdN0H0Z2p9FFtfOQ2ireSj6r58 nPo9U1UIRS+pJzRrZP+MoM9bT/B1qNCVMZ9gwc9QNkDg3Fq7b6D4gY3TxopavjFrx9AxKYZNBqT1j y5KiK7su4/cvVemsNykq6kCk6pWF/v/dOve6pgJKGkTiavGLbTXkV7Lp7WR844ZfuHdg=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lwVGS-0004fi-TT; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 21:43:55 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: =?utf-8?B?56mN5Li55bC8?= Dan Jacobson Subject: Re: bug#49214: dabbrev-expand vs. =?utf-8?Q?=EF=BC=9A?= vs. : References: <87pmwbnjop.5.fsf@jidanni.org> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAGFBMVEVvja90l8Y6ZZ49 OziJg3iXprT38dn////PMCpNAAAAAWJLR0QHFmGI6wAAAAd0SU1FB+UGGBMpE04oaV0AAAFISURB VDjLpZTBboQgEIYHsvYMdvfu0qQvIH0Cxr23yp43jfL+j9ABQRfUtEn/xBjmY+aHCQDwPzEpxX6Y JFSQD8hMr23QMpuzmn6CM56AAq64uhJQ/t+oBHio1qhrrfzgyt9SKXngUcTl2URw+czBZYhAqEbW qhELsD6uAeoIWJaxgrVUb/aBQIwe1CPq3FLqbLA1Ybl3lzQtGdpkwPmVXzz42AFzRg/Uu3f3oG8F Yesz+H4CcASqsFr0+9gAEzJEYV4NsZTcAB83WwDt7FGVgKXj8VWYzyJyCOrfQB9MO9O5UaM3SuYR DLcJtSmAaXVnraG0EiBir9HkYESk6XbsBsIsN9cab6OmGS0TK6AxItjJTlCdnoHXelAjeKgXN7m7 W6LhKj41McuAorte3gLEFsxXegdEsgHpDSjB8iDYVULC3pPxJ51+ACBzvgDPBT2aAAAAJXRFWHRk YXRlOmNyZWF0ZQAyMDIxLTA2LTI0VDE5OjQxOjE4KzAwOjAwPKFougAAACV0RVh0ZGF0ZTptb2Rp ZnkAMjAyMS0wNi0yNFQxOTo0MToxOCswMDowME380AYAAAAASUVORK5CYII= X-Now-Playing: Simple Minds's _Sister Feelings Call_: "20th Century Promised Land" Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 21:43:52 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87pmwbnjop.5.fsf@jidanni.org> (=?utf-8?B?IuepjeS4ueWwvA==?= Dan Jacobson"'s message of "Fri, 25 Jun 2021 03:31:34 +0800") Message-ID: <87eecrf3pj.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson writes: > 1. 名：laura@nurdsboro.org > 2. 名:ralph@nurdsboro.org The problem here is: Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 49214 Cc: 49214@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) =E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC Dan Jacobson writes: > 1. =E5=90=8D=EF=BC=9Alaura@nurdsboro.org > 2. =E5=90=8D:ralph@nurdsboro.org The problem here is: (string-match "^\\sw" "=EF=BC=9Afoo") 0 (string-match "^\\sw" ":foo") nil That is, =EF=BC=9A is word-constituent. I'm not sure whether it's reasonab= le for dabbrev to use \\sw as the regexp here, but it can be controlled by setting `dabbrev-abbrev-char-regexp' to something else. --=20 (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jun 24 16:23:34 2021 Received: (at 49214) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jun 2021 20:23:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44213 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lwVss-0003VE-Hj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 16:23:34 -0400 Received: from dormouse.elm.relay.mailchannels.net ([23.83.212.50]:40588) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lwVsr-0003V6-3I for 49214@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 16:23:33 -0400 X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA187921ED6; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 20:23:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a60.g.dreamhost.com (100-96-133-119.trex.outbound.svc.cluster.local [100.96.133.119]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6538E921CC3; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 20:23:31 +0000 (UTC) X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a60.g.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 100.96.133.119 (trex/6.3.3); Thu, 24 Jun 2021 20:23:31 +0000 X-MC-Relay: Neutral X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|jidanni@jidanni.org X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost X-Stretch-Shoe: 22c4ac3507993d8b_1624566211632_3258687481 X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1624566211632:1125646707 X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1624566211632 Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a60.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a60.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4AE7A2179; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 20:23:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=jidanni.org; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=jidanni.org; bh=G8NsQ5IIvY30uRR0BO Q912eMy6Y=; b=jrFjRPn01puIE1A/iihHged3JmXXFfXnOjDCH+iqn/GzjtR34Q AE74LNFgyZ3za9eHR/K8Rox0gm4WrK/NBiXfe9lBPIwycJONjfaFHtUbeJCMhLJW 3vln1DCzid573UDOFTXwAFCnl1uw4fCed6v1vy1/wjaKcixmkzXRl7mp0= Received: from jidanni.org (114-41-3-170.dynamic-ip.hinet.net [114.41.3.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jidanni@jidanni.org) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a60.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2A8B996325; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 20:23:28 +0000 (UTC) X-DH-BACKEND: pdx1-sub0-mail-a60 From: =?utf-8?B?56mN5Li55bC8?= Dan Jacobson To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#49214: dabbrev-expand vs. =?utf-8?Q?=EF=BC=9A?= vs. : References: <87pmwbnjop.5.fsf@jidanni.org> <87eecrf3pj.fsf@gnus.org> Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 04:23:23 +0800 Message-ID: <87zgvfm2pw.5.fsf@jidanni.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 49214 Cc: 49214@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Why are wide punctuation any less punctuation than narrow punctuation? Sounds like a Euro-centered view of the world. Why can't all punctuation be treated the same, narrow or wide? LI> That is, =EF=BC=9A is word-constituent. I'm not sure whether it's re= asonable LI> for dabbrev to use \\sw as the regexp here, but it can be controlled = by LI> setting `dabbrev-abbrev-char-regexp' to something else. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jun 25 01:43:39 2021 Received: (at 49214-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jun 2021 05:43:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44614 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lwect-0004PB-67 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 01:43:39 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43382) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lwecq-0004Ow-2w for 49214-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 01:43:37 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:40552) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lweck-0005GW-3O; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 01:43:30 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1968 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lwecj-0005Um-Kh; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 01:43:30 -0400 Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 08:43:19 +0300 Message-Id: <83r1gqsdmw.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: =?utf-8?B?56mN5Li55bC8?= Dan Jacobson In-Reply-To: <87zgvfm2pw.5.fsf@jidanni.org> Subject: Re: bug#49214: dabbrev-expand vs. =?utf-8?Q?=EF=BC=9A?= vs. : References: <87pmwbnjop.5.fsf@jidanni.org> <87eecrf3pj.fsf@gnus.org> <87zgvfm2pw.5.fsf@jidanni.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 49214-done Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 49214-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson > > Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 04:23:23 +0800 > Cc: 49214@debbugs.gnu.org > > Why are wide punctuation any less punctuation than narrow punctuation? Some wide punctuation characters are treated specially due to their Word Break properties. The details are in the comments where we define text-mode-syntax-table, and in the Unicode Standard Annex 29 referenced from there. It's just that there was a bug there. > Sounds like a Euro-centered view of the world. That's a nasty accusation which has no basis whatsoever. Please don't do that again here, ever. > Why can't all punctuation be treated the same, narrow or wide? It was a bug, plain and simple. Now fixed on the master branch. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jun 25 01:44:41 2021 Received: (at 49214) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jun 2021 05:44:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44620 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lwedt-0004RN-GI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 01:44:41 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43598) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lwedq-0004R6-3o for 49214@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 01:44:40 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:40570) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lwedk-00062n-Rg; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 01:44:32 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2036 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lwedk-0005ys-DU; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 01:44:32 -0400 Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 08:44:21 +0300 Message-Id: <83pmwasdl6.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Lars Ingebrigtsen In-Reply-To: <87eecrf3pj.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Thu, 24 Jun 2021 21:43:52 +0200) Subject: Re: bug#49214: dabbrev-expand vs. =?utf-8?Q?=EF=BC=9A?= vs. : References: <87pmwbnjop.5.fsf@jidanni.org> <87eecrf3pj.fsf@gnus.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 49214 Cc: 49214@debbugs.gnu.org, jidanni@jidanni.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 21:43:52 +0200 > Cc: 49214@debbugs.gnu.org > > That is, ： is word-constituent. I'm not sure whether it's reasonable > for dabbrev to use \\sw as the regexp here Why not? dabbrev-expand expands words, not any arbitrary sequences of characters. From unknown Sat Jun 21 03:16:35 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 11:24:06 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator