Subject: Re: bug#49214: dabbrev-expand vs. ： vs. :

From: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 04:23:23 +0800

Why are wide punctuation any less punctuation than narrow punctuation?
Sounds like a Euro-centered view of the world.

Why can't all punctuation be treated the same, narrow or wide?

LI> That is, ： is word-constituent.  I'm not sure whether it's reasonable
LI> for dabbrev to use \\sw as the regexp here, but it can be controlled by
LI> setting `dabbrev-abbrev-char-regexp' to something else.