GNU bug report logs - #49204
28.0.50; How to create new file in project by project-find-file

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Giáp Trần <giaptx <at> mht.vn>

Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 10:34:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 28.0.50

Done: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru>
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: Giap Tran <giaptx <at> mht.vn>, Stephen Leake <stephen_leake <at> stephe-leake.org>, 49204 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>
Subject: bug#49204: 28.0.50; How to create new file in project by project-find-file
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2021 14:37:41 +0300
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On 21.07.2021 04:34, Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the 
Swiss army knife of text editors wrote:

>>> I haven't followed the discussion, so I might be off, but I think what
>>> is described above is something you can get simply by passing the
>>> appropriate value for `mustmatch` to `completing-read` and friends
>>> (including `read-file-name`).
>> Probably not: most third-party completion functions out there don't support
>> any non-nil values of that argument other than t (or treat them like t).
> 
> Their loss.

Actually, ivy-completing-read treats 'confirm' the same as nil.

Oh well.

>> And suppose we chose to use 'confirm', would a neutral prompt "Confirm"
>>   without clarification, as opposed to something like "File does not exist;
>> Create?", be our best choice?
> 
> The same question comes up for `C-x C-f` (and `C-x C-b`).
> 
> So far the answer we have chosen is "yes".  We can revisit it,
> of course.  Just like we may want to revisit the way `mustmatch` works,
> but at least there is an existing "standard protocol" to get that kind
> of behavior and I can't think of a good reason why `project-find-file`
> should behave very differently from `find-file` in this respect.

Fair enough.

Trying this approach, I seem to recall the main problem we tried to 
solve originally: the string passed as DEFAULT was returned as the value 
entered by the user if they simply pressed RET, with no additional check 
for whether it actually matches any of the file names (or the "Confirm" 
prompt).

The attached patch seems to solve that. Does the behavior look good to 
everyone?
[project-find-file-confirm-non-match.diff (text/x-patch, attachment)]

This bug report was last modified 3 years and 292 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.