From unknown Sun Jun 22 08:00:08 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#49203] [PATCH 0/2] Add ocaml-cohttp and dependencies Resent-From: Xinglu Chen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 09:56:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 49203 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: 49203@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: guix-patches@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.16245285108174 (code B ref -1); Thu, 24 Jun 2021 09:56:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jun 2021 09:55:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42479 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lwM4k-00027l-La for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 05:55:10 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:33030) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lwM4i-00027b-T5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 05:55:09 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57054) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lwM4i-0001I8-Fj for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 05:55:08 -0400 Received: from h87-96-130-155.cust.a3fiber.se ([87.96.130.155]:45464 helo=mail.yoctocell.xyz) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lwM4f-0002GI-Q0 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 05:55:07 -0400 From: Xinglu Chen DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=yoctocell.xyz; s=mail; t=1624528497; bh=omgst3+wX4PBhNoa39BJZIIewaZ67u0Kq+j3kzXsgeA=; h=From:To:Subject:Date; b=aODJkXVv4EAp8vE8shBubG4qtsvAqzxQWsHbuL70eJrEppYfPMQXAszGyqUGXYaeB G/yb4NkY6tHst/R/XIzaqcesmkQZIKvHqI/ZR1sq9mQZNs6jieINgef6nYmQIOdFUZ qGb63qoE0mYLWHjj1WXUALsODYvV6tCLEJLqupec= Message-Id: Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 11:54:48 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=87.96.130.155; envelope-from=public@yoctocell.xyz; helo=mail.yoctocell.xyz X-Spam_score_int: 29 X-Spam_score: 2.9 X-Spam_bar: ++ X-Spam_report: (2.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD=0.5, FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD_FP=1.499, PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD=1.999, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 2.7 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: This series adds =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=98ocaml-cohttp=E2=80=99,?= an OCaml library HTTP clients and servers. Xinglu Chen (2): gnu: Add ocaml-uri-sexp. gnu: Add ocaml-cohttp. gnu/packages/ocaml.scm | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+) Content analysis details: (2.7 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)] -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [209.51.188.17 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD_FP From abused NTLD 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This series adds =E2=80=98ocaml-cohttp=E2=80=99, an OCaml library HTTP clie= nts and servers. Xinglu Chen (2): gnu: Add ocaml-uri-sexp. gnu: Add ocaml-cohttp. gnu/packages/ocaml.scm | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+) base-commit: 3c86372e36cecaed1ad55675ce32a14b972406bf =2D-=20 2.32.0 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJJBAEBCAAzFiEEAVhh4yyK5+SEykIzrPUJmaL7XHkFAmDUVmgVHHB1YmxpY0B5 b2N0b2NlbGwueHl6AAoJEKz1CZmi+1x5LUIP/jQEk4ps+QGmqvEyV+zCbz0+Ahu6 pBtt4SSP6Aufpgk7NUYK1FW5/4XLj1HtgGLutQh6m1b8LU6J7nCRT52K5gkYDIVL Up969hOJe8EE6mWZdgXAGD4RZFFHJudO3EX93DLeRps8j58J7YUnHG+oAZ4KFzOl u8ds2tpyDE0R0XGmvECI44l7/H/IKFqOVVCSGUPbcQ4FK9uMIoZc7bkru3fH0AXi X4VbQu2B/WZHbEkyvBhtA9Zo3CVFLsmeE3fZwfyIEQe2yXoELUGUO3NeE89UX0lf faD/aIESpbSz0DYPWBU6u/6ILUFeMc+o/dZRlB31MI8eoXX9Mi2Kumkp7E0ClSSG cMfa6yHi3MNcLdIakqAeRawN0LUJZmpLwBh3d2BF4wQOGv50TxUSkNJv07euwptg lkE9xJWJckdPwUzbSmXHh6SgupdOxiPPlY918QwQWmhDPjZit4wVYYyOpxWa424b dOW4jw9y/44ciSDxn9zSkuWXPRyNO2rJ9WyiXhHmCYvRMhobBS6K2uIhXj6718Ct 4mLU/pRhbYIP9XnV5qFneoFw5+7V1xcSyjAN7HLXVgpaPyc1XqFD9P1RCfXMk9/R OHO67V0oFDFKXKmYbJMe/wzB7wtM4GP6bGDDLiTuITxLXf7pO9Qy0vkUyOe+fqCF cFrO+wbx7IW4nl2+ =h9/E -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From unknown Sun Jun 22 08:00:08 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#49203] [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add ocaml-uri-sexp. Resent-From: Xinglu Chen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 09:58:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49203 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: 49203@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 49203-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49203.16245286678413 (code B ref 49203); Thu, 24 Jun 2021 09:58:01 +0000 Received: (at 49203) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jun 2021 09:57:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42485 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lwM7H-0002BY-0y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 05:57:47 -0400 Received: from h87-96-130-155.cust.a3fiber.se ([87.96.130.155]:53794 helo=mail.yoctocell.xyz) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lwM7E-0002BK-VP for 49203@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 05:57:45 -0400 From: Xinglu Chen DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=yoctocell.xyz; s=mail; t=1624528659; bh=8IjJm3Zob4cAxga57SlTDRx152jMW7Jtu4+zqSP9oLg=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=s/BMRpwPBnPWqD1OTrnOimTue9lBomOVHjZBBhKDwH0cPwb/pJGBDFnNnieQpXnEe n6KOjlqP2Y/Q/XlcmkqnyyRi2axSYcCawpmr69TJeClNnOrGth3JOwhuoSx/kX3EPB YUt3G4du/q5yTcjEY/Pspu5y9OJ25Lh3nkRaeops= In-Reply-To: References: Message-Id: <0c74eedb3a07933206ed2127a2b26f433ab77b18.1624528372.git.public@yoctocell.xyz> Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 11:57:38 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 2.9 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: * gnu/packages/ocaml.scm (ocaml-uri-sexp): New variable. --- gnu/packages/ocaml.scm | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+) diff --git a/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm b/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm index 1262c0e303..681d77dd81 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm @@ -7071,6 +7071,34 @@ Graphics.open_graph is [...] Content analysis details: (2.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)] 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD 0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.9 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: * gnu/packages/ocaml.scm (ocaml-uri-sexp): New variable. --- gnu/packages/ocaml.scm | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+) diff --git a/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm b/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm index 1262c0e303..681d77dd81 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm @@ -7071,6 +7071,34 @@ Graphics.open_graph is [...] Content analysis details: (1.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)] 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD 0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager * gnu/packages/ocaml.scm (ocaml-uri-sexp): New variable. --- gnu/packages/ocaml.scm | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+) diff --git a/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm b/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm index 1262c0e303..681d77dd81 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm @@ -7071,6 +7071,34 @@ Graphics.open_graph is called. This library used to be distributed with OCaml up to OCaml 4.08.") (license license:lgpl2.1+))) +(define-public ocaml-uri-sexp + (package + (name "ocaml-uri-sexp") + (version "4.2.0") + (source + (origin + (method git-fetch) + (uri (git-reference + (url "https://github.com/mirage/ocaml-uri") + (commit (string-append "v" version)))) + (file-name (git-file-name name version)) + (sha256 + (base32 + "1bgkc66cq00mgnkz3i535srwzwc4cpdsv0mly5dzvvq33451xwf0")))) + (build-system dune-build-system) + (arguments + '(#:package "uri-sexp" + #:test-target ".")) + (propagated-inputs + `(("ocaml-uri" ,ocaml-uri) + ("ocaml-ppx-sexp-conv" ,ocaml-ppx-sexp-conv) + ("ocaml-sexplib0" ,ocaml-sexplib0))) + (native-inputs `(("ocaml-ounit" ,ocaml-ounit))) + (home-page "https://github.com/mirage/ocaml-uri") + (synopsis "RFC3986 URI/URL parsing library") + (description "This package adds S-exp support to @code{ocaml-uri}.") + (license license:isc))) + (define-public js-of-ocaml (package (name "js-of-ocaml") -- 2.32.0 From unknown Sun Jun 22 08:00:08 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#49203] [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add ocaml-cohttp. Resent-From: Xinglu Chen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 09:58:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49203 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: 49203@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 49203-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49203.16245286698422 (code B ref 49203); Thu, 24 Jun 2021 09:58:02 +0000 Received: (at 49203) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jun 2021 09:57:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42487 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lwM7J-0002Bm-G7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 05:57:49 -0400 Received: from h87-96-130-155.cust.a3fiber.se ([87.96.130.155]:53800 helo=mail.yoctocell.xyz) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lwM7G-0002BN-Qq for 49203@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 05:57:47 -0400 From: Xinglu Chen DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=yoctocell.xyz; s=mail; t=1624528661; bh=JqYoe38PBnlbPmDXxdlzabMUgS03y5kF49xX2QqCEks=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=XD1lkzrrR4VKDMujLu1U95hfFfjo5QTKL9xFQMErXDacr6dT4DM277DOXgp9w1ZM4 nCx/UI30M4RHC8nw4jHluabEJ2iekJdgZW5HppM4oNGpvgWBpHyzh/dpCd5yGcoz2p ennY81Ea6idtC+9GS0oRVKgLcQhit6pEcK973fwo= In-Reply-To: References: Message-Id: <6ad9af73d51482a637598cc98b4fbc153cd99867.1624528372.git.public@yoctocell.xyz> Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 11:57:40 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 2.9 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: * gnu/packages/ocaml.scm (ocaml-cohttp): New variable. --- gnu/packages/ocaml.scm | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+) diff --git a/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm b/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm index 681d77dd81..5e9883d604 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm @@ -7099,6 +7099,44 @@ up to OCaml 4.08.") (d [...] Content analysis details: (2.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)] 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD 0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.9 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: * gnu/packages/ocaml.scm (ocaml-cohttp): New variable. --- gnu/packages/ocaml.scm | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+) diff --git a/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm b/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm index 681d77dd81..5e9883d604 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm @@ -7099,6 +7099,44 @@ up to OCaml 4.08.") (d [...] Content analysis details: (1.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)] 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD 0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager * gnu/packages/ocaml.scm (ocaml-cohttp): New variable. --- gnu/packages/ocaml.scm | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+) diff --git a/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm b/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm index 681d77dd81..5e9883d604 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm @@ -7099,6 +7099,44 @@ up to OCaml 4.08.") (description "This package adds S-exp support to @code{ocaml-uri}.") (license license:isc))) +(define-public ocaml-cohttp + (package + (name "ocaml-cohttp") + (version "4.0.0") + (source + (origin + (method git-fetch) + (uri (git-reference + (url "https://github.com/mirage/ocaml-cohttp") + (commit (string-append "v" version)))) + (file-name (git-file-name name version)) + (sha256 + (base32 + "02d7417yy1i62by368w3wyw3756047pbrw69spcvz3cd1z7vqaci")))) + (build-system dune-build-system) + (arguments + '(#:package "cohttp" + #:test-target "cohttp_test/src")) + (propagated-inputs + `(("ocaml-re" ,ocaml-re) + ("ocaml-uri" ,ocaml-uri) + ("ocaml-uri-sexp" ,ocaml-uri-sexp) + ("ocaml-sexplib0" ,ocaml-sexplib0) + ("ocaml-ppx-sexp-conv" ,ocaml-ppx-sexp-conv) + ("ocaml-stringext" ,ocaml-stringext) + ("ocaml-base64" ,ocaml-base64))) + (native-inputs + `(("ocaml-fmt" ,ocaml-fmt) + ("ocaml-jsonm" ,ocaml-jsonm) + ("ocaml-alcotest" ,ocaml-alcotest))) + (home-page "https://github.com/mirage/ocaml-cohttp") + (synopsis "OCaml library for HTTP clients and servers") + (description + "Cohttp is an OCaml library for creating HTTP daemons. It has a portable +HTTP parser, and implementations using various asynchronous programming +libraries.") + (license license:isc))) + (define-public js-of-ocaml (package (name "js-of-ocaml") -- 2.32.0 From unknown Sun Jun 22 08:00:08 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#49203] [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add ocaml-uri-sexp. Resent-From: Adu O'Hara Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 15:04:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49203 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Xinglu Chen Cc: 49203@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: 49203@debbugs.gnu.org, guix-patches@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.162454703724923 (code B ref -1); Thu, 24 Jun 2021 15:04:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jun 2021 15:03:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43804 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lwQtY-0006Tq-Nz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 11:03:57 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:34984) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lwOl3-0000Qd-J0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 08:47:01 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34834) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lwOl3-0003nn-AR for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 08:47:01 -0400 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:54441) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lwOl0-00024B-GW for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 08:47:01 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04A12240100 for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 14:46:53 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1624538814; bh=fUcwAMIfWAiy0Ppg4dSmwlZ+BBMpvZ+DkTluH59YIcE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=ZduI62T/mLn8Otd2yD8hYubafKwwBUvqauzviV1wM2VDN5zfAlyA3d2cpufW2EYKh ymm03TzA9+CAgYOTgwsxpoIdAFsTUC6SXpFhxrlybYiZcE7v7kTA2CrRJnKQs0bqte djJNYLcxwDImtALp9WU8o1pY6p19IYWpMaSNLTmgjsushoyKbi+ywnRnKyPDoem5bR 0iKZq0XaAYYhC2vEICjOgeyM9DK4YphECBxpd2uCeabF+OZGn68AU/bypI9unPDAoi J4hoALjaqplz49Xju53JSEXws9nOxckKJtdTjBls3pvXtvoN7zWbe+D7lewuroZ5Vq yZIk8luTcTZyA== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4G9fz03hq2z9rxK; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 14:46:52 +0200 (CEST) References: <0c74eedb3a07933206ed2127a2b26f433ab77b18.1624528372.git.public@yoctocell.xyz> From: Adu O'Hara Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 12:42:27 +0000 In-reply-to: <0c74eedb3a07933206ed2127a2b26f433ab77b18.1624528372.git.public@yoctocell.xyz> Message-ID: <86lf6zxwec.fsf@posteo.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=adu.ohara@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 11:03:52 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/) Thanks for the patches! There is already an `ocaml-uri`. How about updating that to 4.2.0 (currently at 4.1.0) and let `ocaml-uri-sexp` inherit from ocaml-uri with #:package set to "uri-sexp"? Another alternatively: remove the #:package argument from `ocaml-uri` so that all packages are built (`uri`, `uri-sexp` and `uri-re`). Xinglu Chen writes: > * gnu/packages/ocaml.scm (ocaml-uri-sexp): New variable. > --- > gnu/packages/ocaml.scm | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm b/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm > index 1262c0e303..681d77dd81 100644 > --- a/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm > +++ b/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm > @@ -7071,6 +7071,34 @@ Graphics.open_graph is called. This > library used to be distributed with OCaml > up to OCaml 4.08.") > (license license:lgpl2.1+))) > > +(define-public ocaml-uri-sexp > + (package > + (name "ocaml-uri-sexp") > + (version "4.2.0") > + (source > + (origin > + (method git-fetch) > + (uri (git-reference > + (url "https://github.com/mirage/ocaml-uri") > + (commit (string-append "v" version)))) > + (file-name (git-file-name name version)) > + (sha256 > + (base32 > + > "1bgkc66cq00mgnkz3i535srwzwc4cpdsv0mly5dzvvq33451xwf0")))) > + (build-system dune-build-system) > + (arguments > + '(#:package "uri-sexp" > + #:test-target ".")) > + (propagated-inputs > + `(("ocaml-uri" ,ocaml-uri) > + ("ocaml-ppx-sexp-conv" ,ocaml-ppx-sexp-conv) > + ("ocaml-sexplib0" ,ocaml-sexplib0))) > + (native-inputs `(("ocaml-ounit" ,ocaml-ounit))) > + (home-page "https://github.com/mirage/ocaml-uri") > + (synopsis "RFC3986 URI/URL parsing library") > + (description "This package adds S-exp support to > @code{ocaml-uri}.") > + (license license:isc))) > + > (define-public js-of-ocaml > (package > (name "js-of-ocaml") From unknown Sun Jun 22 08:00:08 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#49203] [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add ocaml-uri-sexp. Resent-From: Xinglu Chen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 18:41:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49203 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Adu O'Hara Cc: 49203@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 49203-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49203.16245600132415 (code B ref 49203); Thu, 24 Jun 2021 18:41:02 +0000 Received: (at 49203) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jun 2021 18:40:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44127 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lwUGq-0000cs-NK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 14:40:12 -0400 Received: from h87-96-130-155.cust.a3fiber.se ([87.96.130.155]:37546 helo=mail.yoctocell.xyz) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lwUGo-0000cV-4q for 49203@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 14:40:10 -0400 From: Xinglu Chen DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=yoctocell.xyz; s=mail; t=1624560002; bh=JwfwAMen0N5G1aVly+GmF3HxwxWLdp0FPAZ2NprMkgQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=HB4xp7HZC1ZUQ9JUKwGBWfI1iQfG7fwjpw4sp33HkHH4mb9BpxuIGcmjlg6pkbkGg YXUpeQQV8+Wyw+/jlaqMpYffBQ8sstC8dCNSzDVmDvAaeNFCOcRwY8OvLokRhk+P1z tDQ7H6ONgFp0ho7Yg3cusqBU8SscmPXKW4TXJaro= In-Reply-To: <86lf6zxwec.fsf@posteo.net> References: <0c74eedb3a07933206ed2127a2b26f433ab77b18.1624528372.git.public@yoctocell.xyz> <86lf6zxwec.fsf@posteo.net> Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 20:39:52 +0200 Message-ID: <87a6nf9kef.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 2.9 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Thu, Jun 24 2021, Adu O'Hara wrote: > Thanks for the patches! > > There is already an `ocaml-uri`. How about updating that to 4.2.0 > (currently at 4.1.0) and let `ocaml-uri-sexp` inherit from > ocaml-uri with #:package set to "uri-sexp [...] Content analysis details: (2.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.9 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Thu, Jun 24 2021, Adu O'Hara wrote: > Thanks for the patches! > > There is already an `ocaml-uri`. How about updating that to 4.2.0 > (currently at 4.1.0) and let `ocaml-uri-sexp` inherit from > ocaml-uri with #:package set to "uri-sexp [...] Content analysis details: (2.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD 1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jun 24 2021, Adu O'Hara wrote: > Thanks for the patches! > > There is already an `ocaml-uri`. How about updating that to 4.2.0=20 > (currently at 4.1.0) and let `ocaml-uri-sexp` inherit from=20 > ocaml-uri with #:package set to "uri-sexp"? That could probably be done in a separate patch series; this series is about adding =E2=80=98ocaml-cohttp=E2=80=99. > Another alternatively: remove the #:package argument from=20 > `ocaml-uri` so that all packages are built (`uri`, `uri-sexp` and=20 > `uri-re`). Those are three separate packages on Opam, so I don=E2=80=99t think it makes sense for us to merge them into one. Not everyone who installs =E2=80=98ocaml-uri=E2=80=99 is going to want =E2=80=98ocaml-uri-sexp=E2=80= =99 and =E2=80=98ocaml-uri-re=E2=80=99. WDYT? --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJJBAEBCAAzFiEEAVhh4yyK5+SEykIzrPUJmaL7XHkFAmDU0XgVHHB1YmxpY0B5 b2N0b2NlbGwueHl6AAoJEKz1CZmi+1x5Qt8P/jCFsxpk2aNRWBfN7Iq1CKvX59hD G4bwpmIBYODIGVifyA4GqS5B9ysW9QtvVYc9n7RIMhSeLSn6gSx4EUCYiFzOGKD3 9Q5lBGzjFmGEgkj8k+92EvGjn8GBUOHAb7W/uBNqORff88CaOlH6+Coj9U/C8fpX wzJd/kdaSZt8pgNBxQ4f6C7vITwE8yK4XFvwy9h+RYRLmmqbLpdXzlos6U5PDCsF z7lWNsF02Ie3t8C/P9xeY8jfai/Yf+t/rB1hTE7zAS4b0eJXfw+YjGRmVYzzP5iD U4w5lSXGIQaxaJdZkpv80vUOjSVtQe77VpwoZVWL2cZtxeECKo80zKxV/u4v1m0G s5gagHtTHbPdHW5yalcE1A+f0jzddZ0bK6A/3NO9HjIJuw4Aq/c7aonbBilc9kV6 UVKV2P7B8A3xDb2JP29TWGb+begSG2pK9qs50fFPqMLzFYrPh/Ev+DP2hq/YvLNZ U3ks/4DgzRoijZyQnxHKXwV1w0z727liCXl2QNTg3Gx029birCiv0K8rx4CejUZW drdVhW3WUo7/Zg1Ats3btDHzzU12f7BKVsiCbwANGx451/mTLDD8/lVnj3eDEk7/ Rq5DjqtzELxJVJxgWhGY1/bEpXJOOYUrZxBIlyBaMSbpGr3Kq51JNyuo+VKms/Jt wEJoTrojRpcflKCY =kioP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From unknown Sun Jun 22 08:00:08 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#49203] [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add ocaml-uri-sexp. Resent-From: Adu O'Hara Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 19:48:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49203 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Xinglu Chen Cc: 49203@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 49203-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49203.16245640749796 (code B ref 49203); Thu, 24 Jun 2021 19:48:02 +0000 Received: (at 49203) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jun 2021 19:47:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44196 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lwVKM-0002Xw-3o for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 15:47:54 -0400 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:42273) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lwVKI-0002Xh-Pr for 49203@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 15:47:53 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A8FD24002D for <49203@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 21:47:44 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1624564064; bh=efF+zcSRnpJdhkEnSqmeVj5i6pBbi0Fy5hp8pcwL+6A=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=HgzE0lvH1NlMpQh5emoCnXWUMJpxbViWGAwkVZfPa15ILrXxRdq0bPfRH0NnAfnvk 4zowxKKRd85dT+PgODOwlMN7HYfGXohoTtInXTilIwuCdxdHAL0zWP+G0rP62rvGGy x88vIAWFm7LQuT/t9SfHuqKMBit+JeTXgep8zkTRp0cjrrRvdHdfYvXFY5ug23QXRR wuq21YqvC2CbJRnpvy9xDimMRXbj0EGl11BNQnkU2/dtNrqpowFtaEFpw/NnJ1VI5B QURb0MWrAHRgmxgAW1sGLGJjrrMEjcvBlhUCv5u56xNC1yV7ECXeeGvLqA++7TkyJo DiMZ7yB90Jr2w== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4G9rJb475Zz9rxQ; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 21:47:43 +0200 (CEST) References: <0c74eedb3a07933206ed2127a2b26f433ab77b18.1624528372.git.public@yoctocell.xyz> <86lf6zxwec.fsf@posteo.net> <87a6nf9kef.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> From: Adu O'Hara Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 19:32:30 +0000 In-reply-to: <87a6nf9kef.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> Message-ID: <86k0mjxcwx.fsf@posteo.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) Xinglu Chen writes: > On Thu, Jun 24 2021, Adu O'Hara wrote: > >> Thanks for the patches! >> >> There is already an `ocaml-uri`. How about updating that to=20 >> 4.2.0=20 >> (currently at 4.1.0) and let `ocaml-uri-sexp` inherit from=20 >> ocaml-uri with #:package set to "uri-sexp"? > > That could probably be done in a separate patch series; this=20 > series is > about adding =E2=80=98ocaml-cohttp=E2=80=99. True, what I was suggesting would add another patch to the series=20 and mix up intentions of the series. Still, I'd suggest for=20 ocaml-uri-sexp to inherit from ocaml-uri. Otherwise we have them=20 at two different versions. wdyt? > >> Another alternatively: remove the #:package argument from=20 >> `ocaml-uri` so that all packages are built (`uri`, `uri-sexp`=20 >> and=20 >> `uri-re`). > > Those are three separate packages on Opam, so I don=E2=80=99t think it=20 > makes > sense for us to merge them into one. Not everyone who installs > =E2=80=98ocaml-uri=E2=80=99 is going to want =E2=80=98ocaml-uri-sexp=E2= =80=99 and=20 > =E2=80=98ocaml-uri-re=E2=80=99. > > WDYT? Yeah, that make sense. Keeping them separate sounds good. From unknown Sun Jun 22 08:00:08 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#49203] [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add ocaml-uri-sexp. Resent-From: Xinglu Chen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 09:19:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49203 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Adu O'Hara Cc: 49203@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 49203-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49203.162461269831195 (code B ref 49203); Fri, 25 Jun 2021 09:19:02 +0000 Received: (at 49203) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jun 2021 09:18:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44863 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lwhyc-000875-IU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 05:18:18 -0400 Received: from h87-96-130-155.cust.a3fiber.se ([87.96.130.155]:57976 helo=mail.yoctocell.xyz) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lwhyb-00086n-2R for 49203@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 05:18:17 -0400 From: Xinglu Chen DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=yoctocell.xyz; s=mail; t=1624612685; bh=kHgdndxKFjriLpDhsikXgNoT2srDDdd1Kehgl+QA02Q=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=Btn22VmMPLM09/sFezDEgkBqlT1xqHL4Ko1gnyyIqHVCxfsm6Y9+VPcuVUJb7Tc5L 1oIxieQoNRHdsWi99du6hfw0tw8PqJ/J9Yj8+e6ErEjiThkXVG8sVjNGywuj6gNO/5 mfHnCj06foH0yQdqCKtpdPJ/i6RXOUzj4JE1VpZw= In-Reply-To: <86k0mjxcwx.fsf@posteo.net> References: <0c74eedb3a07933206ed2127a2b26f433ab77b18.1624528372.git.public@yoctocell.xyz> <86lf6zxwec.fsf@posteo.net> <87a6nf9kef.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> <86k0mjxcwx.fsf@posteo.net> Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 11:18:04 +0200 Message-ID: <875yy2joab.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 2.9 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Thu, Jun 24 2021, Adu O'Hara wrote: > Xinglu Chen writes: > >> On Thu, Jun 24 2021, Adu O'Hara wrote: >> >>> Thanks for the patches! >>> >>> There is already an `ocaml-uri`. How about updating that to >>> 4.2.0 >> [...] Content analysis details: (2.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.9 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Thu, Jun 24 2021, Adu O'Hara wrote: > Xinglu Chen writes: > >> On Thu, Jun 24 2021, Adu O'Hara wrote: >> >>> Thanks for the patches! >>> >>> There is already an `ocaml-uri`. How about updating that to >>> 4.2.0 >> [...] Content analysis details: (2.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD 1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jun 24 2021, Adu O'Hara wrote: > Xinglu Chen writes: > >> On Thu, Jun 24 2021, Adu O'Hara wrote: >> >>> Thanks for the patches! >>> >>> There is already an `ocaml-uri`. How about updating that to=20 >>> 4.2.0=20 >>> (currently at 4.1.0) and let `ocaml-uri-sexp` inherit from=20 >>> ocaml-uri with #:package set to "uri-sexp"? >> >> That could probably be done in a separate patch series; this=20 >> series is >> about adding =E2=80=98ocaml-cohttp=E2=80=99. > > True, what I was suggesting would add another patch to the series=20 > and mix up intentions of the series. Sorry, I don=E2=80=99t get what you are trying to say here. > Still, I'd suggest for ocaml-uri-sexp to inherit from > ocaml-uri. Otherwise we have them at two different versions. I think it makes more sense to do that in a separate series since updating =E2=80=98ocaml-uri=E2=80=99 isn=E2=80=99t really related to adding= =E2=80=98ocaml-cohttp=E2=80=99. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJJBAEBCAAzFiEEAVhh4yyK5+SEykIzrPUJmaL7XHkFAmDVn0wVHHB1YmxpY0B5 b2N0b2NlbGwueHl6AAoJEKz1CZmi+1x5cRQP/iYfgyPRiy4VVdLI5840YCKjwO/5 GJgY5ad68dVohuirfATjR5QsQuGWxjaGG1xPBLpokPnSC5OQ5KNgVHf41WcAsaay DJB2tN9IVa13KeQGCxVE+nl/P+aMdWIS4FH7s7jCH62CX7ZKBZ1zbJybWxMl2em6 h2OkEuvkuFyPl06ZkKF3VnJx1AT2zuiypb8MYhdxmxyID/IgdX2S2B0GUwiX733P fp4OTr78ZF7BQR84bJOFXrCwLK4PzOGc9Ds98NhGXXA+fbclthYXXCOKXclUtHcd OPYxwIVCwzyyH8jCWTkoi2UxoKxJASkYVwBrI2rwS1PxEVgIcZzNroEuaNygu3+X CdMZT/JL5pCNqpQaVrZfGXumqX4frdkd4u+o5Qy5ZBevduNEgpDwgjG6OU/xyVQv PsR11lPMYtF01/6PBSYVFvrIVLc+lZtb1JMat5JO3lDKSTqBLTM3O6BX4zwlUV8t lf6cWjWByvudTZ2nyG53VBAAgtZhQF2gzwofk/T+dnIeGmZVWiDXvRuLtdRtc8q/ qGYuO4Wt+1D46daa8ygb8qtM3s98OOXFUJDrZVxZ/cuGtVxlQk6WKsjuau5cWOnU bmmgOo11xFEzHkcoffSqP+VGV9ESqjPwJLfC2eD3cx1XNV5ZiPi3zwTgbS9QEK4U 9q1kV0AWJou0DjZd =/u0E -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From unknown Sun Jun 22 08:00:08 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#49203] [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add ocaml-uri-sexp. Resent-From: Adu O'Hara Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 10:25:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49203 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Xinglu Chen Cc: 49203@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 49203-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49203.162461665413283 (code B ref 49203); Fri, 25 Jun 2021 10:25:02 +0000 Received: (at 49203) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jun 2021 10:24:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44927 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lwj0Q-0003SB-L1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 06:24:14 -0400 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:44369) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lwj0N-0003Rw-Pr for 49203@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 06:24:12 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1860240028 for <49203@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 12:24:05 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1624616645; bh=6WECp+CXrLuFn2F5vReTSsX5SVp5E9aS/zuCuPJ9tYY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=SWiJQlUPLrGz3Kgvxx87kF2C0KD7xpcMkbSRDxYCGWmq0qM1YEGTZhfXT6CyujEZ6 VuAUAXDirIAJbSjCznRNHrHzNPoO6lJOxrNWHJ6clLCgyVTaoYEXu/oplybGiuTBvG MPJVVc8aeO7DpHoststKJGO/bIICvIpLzkgvvyN6UCWzSAfpP96/MXVYhug6fOci9M C8Xl0XUAhKniEO6zWdht5QN/ODAK7HV4/CROoRRaw5UEwAzw2O4EM6DwH4C9UAnR7s /X2lnr3CfRHzslpiCC1Dq6Lc6/CylbzqeJBDsE+PcEdqm0H4XBMLnj9B7CRlmwvlom JtHA4gFiQoXog== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4GBCll5pKQz6tmR; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 12:24:03 +0200 (CEST) References: <0c74eedb3a07933206ed2127a2b26f433ab77b18.1624528372.git.public@yoctocell.xyz> <86lf6zxwec.fsf@posteo.net> <87a6nf9kef.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> <86k0mjxcwx.fsf@posteo.net> <875yy2joab.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> From: Adu O'Hara Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 10:04:39 +0000 In-reply-to: <875yy2joab.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> Message-ID: <86fsx6xmwx.fsf@posteo.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) Xinglu Chen writes: >> True, what I was suggesting would add another patch to the=20 >> series=20 >> and mix up intentions of the series. > > Sorry, I don=E2=80=99t get what you are trying to say here. > >> Still, I'd suggest for ocaml-uri-sexp to inherit from >> ocaml-uri. Otherwise we have them at two different versions. > > I think it makes more sense to do that in a separate series=20 > since > updating =E2=80=98ocaml-uri=E2=80=99 isn=E2=80=99t really related to addi= ng=20 > =E2=80=98ocaml-cohttp=E2=80=99. Sorry for being unclear. Here's what I mean: (define-public ocaml-uri-sexp (package (inherit ocaml-uri) (name "ocaml-uri-sexp") (arguments `(#:package "uri-sexp" #:test-target ".")) (propagated-inputs `(("ocaml-uri" ,ocaml-uri) ("ocaml-ppx-sexp-conv" ,ocaml-ppx-sexp-conv) ("ocaml-sexplib0" ,ocaml-sexplib0))) (native-inputs `(("ocaml-ounit" ,ocaml-ounit))))) Then when `ocaml-uri` eventually gets updated `ocaml-uri` and=20 `ocaml-uri-sexp` will be at same version. From unknown Sun Jun 22 08:00:08 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#49203] [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add ocaml-uri-sexp. Resent-From: Xinglu Chen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 10:59:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49203 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Adu O'Hara Cc: 49203@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 49203-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49203.162461869917193 (code B ref 49203); Fri, 25 Jun 2021 10:59:01 +0000 Received: (at 49203) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jun 2021 10:58:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44945 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lwjXP-0004TF-0U for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 06:58:19 -0400 Received: from h87-96-130-155.cust.a3fiber.se ([87.96.130.155]:60250 helo=mail.yoctocell.xyz) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lwjXL-0004St-HS for 49203@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 06:58:18 -0400 From: Xinglu Chen DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=yoctocell.xyz; s=mail; t=1624618687; bh=2ZWIji5Xp9dzSJnmiFGVA7xeah3y98ByQkQfmMLB0lc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=K7lXPO2gb8B4UrYqmpByvz3B7bC/RqGMm+qOIEi7/OGC/Hy/Wb2yyj2OJZ4Klht7/ tAMpLaFxJ5JsYYDCrm7uWzuyNNIzINR5fCYawsm2fLJVodMw77XFe79PtmBazVIbbD S75mcbdAq9Zs8j87O68UHsqHX1B7FaWtJ531prqY= In-Reply-To: <86fsx6xmwx.fsf@posteo.net> References: <0c74eedb3a07933206ed2127a2b26f433ab77b18.1624528372.git.public@yoctocell.xyz> <86lf6zxwec.fsf@posteo.net> <87a6nf9kef.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> <86k0mjxcwx.fsf@posteo.net> <875yy2joab.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> <86fsx6xmwx.fsf@posteo.net> Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 12:58:06 +0200 Message-ID: <8735t6jjnl.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 2.9 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Fri, Jun 25 2021, Adu O'Hara wrote: > Xinglu Chen writes: > >>> True, what I was suggesting would add another patch to the >>> series >>> and mix up intentions of the series. >> >> Sorry, I =?UTF-8?Q?don=E2=80=99t?= get what you ar [...] Content analysis details: (2.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.9 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Fri, Jun 25 2021, Adu O'Hara wrote: > Xinglu Chen writes: > >>> True, what I was suggesting would add another patch to the >>> series >>> and mix up intentions of the series. >> >> Sorry, I =?UTF-8?Q?don=E2=80=99t?= get what you ar [...] Content analysis details: (2.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD 1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jun 25 2021, Adu O'Hara wrote: > Xinglu Chen writes: > >>> True, what I was suggesting would add another patch to the=20 >>> series=20 >>> and mix up intentions of the series. >> >> Sorry, I don=E2=80=99t get what you are trying to say here. >> >>> Still, I'd suggest for ocaml-uri-sexp to inherit from >>> ocaml-uri. Otherwise we have them at two different versions. >> >> I think it makes more sense to do that in a separate series=20 >> since >> updating =E2=80=98ocaml-uri=E2=80=99 isn=E2=80=99t really related to add= ing=20 >> =E2=80=98ocaml-cohttp=E2=80=99. > > Sorry for being unclear. Here's what I mean: > > (define-public ocaml-uri-sexp > (package > (inherit ocaml-uri) > (name "ocaml-uri-sexp") > (arguments > `(#:package "uri-sexp" > #:test-target ".")) > (propagated-inputs > `(("ocaml-uri" ,ocaml-uri) > ("ocaml-ppx-sexp-conv" ,ocaml-ppx-sexp-conv) > ("ocaml-sexplib0" ,ocaml-sexplib0))) > (native-inputs `(("ocaml-ounit" ,ocaml-ounit))))) > > Then when `ocaml-uri` eventually gets updated `ocaml-uri` and=20 > `ocaml-uri-sexp` will be at same version. But =E2=80=98ocaml-uri=E2=80=99 would first have to be updated to the lates= t version, which I think is out of scope of this series. Once this series gets merged, I think it would be great to update =E2=80=98ocaml-uri=E2=80=99, and then make =E2=80=98ocaml-uri-sexp=E2=80=99= inherit from it. WDYT? --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJJBAEBCAAzFiEEAVhh4yyK5+SEykIzrPUJmaL7XHkFAmDVtr4VHHB1YmxpY0B5 b2N0b2NlbGwueHl6AAoJEKz1CZmi+1x59JYP/j4C+3xwL+bBhxzVK6uIpB3/5F+F yhVnKzUY4s5VpE8JHTuABxj7CHBOM6bYP1myfYWGhYCg2Yj2hy4dgsxBewyXEkpz uHHJoDTFDYf6AS3UWsb/TWk9uGixSeQ700QxkJ2kfpBR1PoddTEet6lHlZwbTeqG +ttwFIZOACpTzN+ODWWdgOLJaFF8+g9UTfUxUH+A4VFH8QFFtgQZxToEb/LtI/KM GhQo/ePgYv4hIIaFqfzIIcaZ+IFMCDy78O/DLLJxh8sFRJ14zdcs2MiFd0as7+x+ IG/7edJKh2Ebqd1M50dzMp56erBPjONdThAeVXhhwvrb1A+WG5udz+xNOvOcSsxL rKL1v0MrQTrs3qbl7ii0BT+PbmOaF7wIDeDlG1Nhs4q3uZ+2NO/9ICU1wXRo88hT uJFgMH0WblxdRsmVZfmpkqRM0X9fdseS1242KkyyqGjEsT19twzRThxDubk/gf/I ta4V+nd/4bS0A7Sf7SOxxCiREWBbxatq3catV7votpVmJmHHPccOg69XhkCFjLAs u4c3+iOmJYtzX5TbbEOfaTGGSxjXuS4+YBzKjKmNdpUmNXElkNa6E1/bfH/CHaxr kwPVYKQthtWMeucvI3t76tNu59GD7/8f8hJo6QnL4pd0/KLE+p5eve0KBXQCRO+1 B+MKjBlrVfF9jdah =GGHf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From unknown Sun Jun 22 08:00:08 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#49203] [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add ocaml-uri-sexp. Resent-From: Julien Lepiller Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 11:07:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49203 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Xinglu Chen ,Adu O'Hara Cc: 49203@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 49203-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49203.162461917718091 (code B ref 49203); Fri, 25 Jun 2021 11:07:01 +0000 Received: (at 49203) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jun 2021 11:06:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44949 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lwjf6-0004hi-Rm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 07:06:17 -0400 Received: from lepiller.eu ([89.234.186.109]:45750) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lwjf3-0004hV-PV for 49203@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 07:06:15 -0400 Received: from lepiller.eu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lepiller.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 338d33a2; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 11:06:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=lepiller.eu; h=date :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:subject:to:cc:from:message-id; s= dkim; bh=wbl6Dn1+06TJXuGAatiMLl3R9NZ9QO0v+Yw+uABLhhA=; b=WCRPiGR bIAXsL8Tdhu5nEt/JGsNgSNr6DKNM4Hvsf8Qy1Os6zSiqxaIxX30zKdsIb/YVV5r hcqHT4bX1vLwQ/xHsRSKRtcE5iO/03EOe8YWUyBK+BHqFoeGf8Bb5szomMOCO2A2 ZnVOrFac4HftKZkRTKNjWhOfhMp23j/L5DuvRhlhYc4rP2qJ+gWQTD660w3BfbL4 m3hnvsMk3XqCczmSxrpvFpPun7TC0IUDBFm4Vqt8iDoZzmTWGw23kCxlxso0lYUN ylFL6HWgTK915cboQD0RF8nq0ajVDjkBgh7rRC19JzeCYFhKFkUyH9OsTbfsOsre 6BEWXVv9cmyeMtg== Received: by lepiller.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 6e7fac6d (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Fri, 25 Jun 2021 11:06:10 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 07:06:03 -0400 User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: <8735t6jjnl.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> References: <0c74eedb3a07933206ed2127a2b26f433ab77b18.1624528372.git.public@yoctocell.xyz> <86lf6zxwec.fsf@posteo.net> <87a6nf9kef.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> <86k0mjxcwx.fsf@posteo.net> <875yy2joab.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> <86fsx6xmwx.fsf@posteo.net> <8735t6jjnl.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----DIIZG14J2K4KRKXC0OUA0J94L2RV0D" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Julien Lepiller Message-ID: <6960AAD0-85AD-4DB2-ACB8-B5CC7F0042FB@lepiller.eu> X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi, what matters is that patches focus on one thing, and one one. I agree with Adu here, we should make sure uri anl uri-sexp are the same version. If you really don't want to do that in this series, [...] Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)] -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) ------DIIZG14J2K4KRKXC0OUA0J94L2RV0D Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, what matters is that patches focus on one thing, and one one=2E I agree= with Adu here, we should make sure uri anl uri-sexp are the same version= =2E If you really don't want to do that in this series, send it as another = series, and make it blocking for this one=2E I'll try to merge your work th= is week-end=2E Le 25 juin 2021 06:58:06 GMT-04:00, Xinglu Chen a= =C3=A9crit : >On Fri, Jun 25 2021, Adu O'Hara wrote: > >> Xinglu Chen writes: >> >>>> True, what I was suggesting would add another patch to the=20 >>>> series=20 >>>> and mix up intentions of the series=2E >>> >>> Sorry, I don=E2=80=99t get what you are trying to say here=2E >>> >>>> Still, I'd suggest for ocaml-uri-sexp to inherit from >>>> ocaml-uri=2E Otherwise we have them at two different versions=2E >>> >>> I think it makes more sense to do that in a separate series=20 >>> since >>> updating =E2=80=98ocaml-uri=E2=80=99 isn=E2=80=99t really related to a= dding=20 >>> =E2=80=98ocaml-cohttp=E2=80=99=2E >> >> Sorry for being unclear=2E Here's what I mean: >> >> (define-public ocaml-uri-sexp >> (package >> (inherit ocaml-uri) >> (name "ocaml-uri-sexp") >> (arguments >> `(#:package "uri-sexp" >> #:test-target "=2E")) >> (propagated-inputs >> `(("ocaml-uri" ,ocaml-uri) >> ("ocaml-ppx-sexp-conv" ,ocaml-ppx-sexp-conv) >> ("ocaml-sexplib0" ,ocaml-sexplib0))) >> (native-inputs `(("ocaml-ounit" ,ocaml-ounit))))) >> >> Then when `ocaml-uri` eventually gets updated `ocaml-uri` and=20 >> `ocaml-uri-sexp` will be at same version=2E > >But =E2=80=98ocaml-uri=E2=80=99 would first have to be updated to the lat= est version, >which I think is out of scope of this series=2E > >Once this series gets merged, I think it would be great to update >=E2=80=98ocaml-uri=E2=80=99, and then make =E2=80=98ocaml-uri-sexp=E2=80= =99 inherit from it=2E > >WDYT? ------DIIZG14J2K4KRKXC0OUA0J94L2RV0D Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, what matters is that patches focus on one thin= g, and one one=2E I agree with Adu here, we should make sure uri anl uri-se= xp are the same version=2E If you really don't want to do that in this seri= es, send it as another series, and make it blocking for this one=2E I'll tr= y to merge your work this week-end=2E

Le = 25 juin 2021 06:58:06 GMT-04:00, Xinglu Chen <public@yoctocell=2Exyz>= a =C3=A9crit :
On Fri, Jun 25 2021, Adu O'Hara wrote:

 Xinglu Chen <public@yoctocel=
l=2Exyz> writes:

True, what I was suggesti=
ng would add another patch to the 
series 
and mix up intentions of t=
he series=2E

 Sorry, I don=E2=80=99t get what you are t=
rying to say here=2E

     (=
arguments
      `(#:package "uri-sexp"
        #:test-target "=2E"))<=
br>     (propagated-inputs
       `(("ocaml-uri" ,ocaml-uri)
        =
 ("ocaml-ppx-sexp-conv" ,ocaml-ppx-sexp-conv)
         ("ocaml-sexplib0"=
 ,ocaml-sexplib0)))
     (native-inputs `(("ocaml-ounit" ,ocaml-ounit)))=
))

 Then when `ocaml-uri` eventually gets updated `ocaml-uri` and  `ocaml-uri-sexp` will be at same version=2E

But =E2=
=80=98ocaml-uri=E2=80=99 would first have to be updated to the latest versi=
on,
which I think is out of scope of this series=2E

Once this ser=
ies gets merged, I think it would be great to update
=E2=80=98ocaml-uri=
=E2=80=99, and then make =E2=80=98ocaml-uri-sexp=E2=80=99 inherit from it=
=2E

WDYT?
------DIIZG14J2K4KRKXC0OUA0J94L2RV0D-- From unknown Sun Jun 22 08:00:08 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#49203] [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add ocaml-uri-sexp. Resent-From: Xinglu Chen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 12:41:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49203 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Julien Lepiller , Adu O'Hara Cc: 49203@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 49203-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49203.162462480411403 (code B ref 49203); Fri, 25 Jun 2021 12:41:01 +0000 Received: (at 49203) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jun 2021 12:40:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45098 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lwl7s-0002xq-Eh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 08:40:04 -0400 Received: from h87-96-130-155.cust.a3fiber.se ([87.96.130.155]:34418 helo=mail.yoctocell.xyz) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lwl7m-0002xB-35 for 49203@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 08:40:02 -0400 From: Xinglu Chen DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=yoctocell.xyz; s=mail; t=1624624789; bh=YGuYkAea1zFpvt8HXcZpQMKgkJjouz+H110OyBEhB+U=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=U5bHueNeCEf1BWz8F44RT1gz3Sx+9i+szFd/1hEY0p49cBk3ESDjQYDK228TgaEXF W0fn+4AQaJQev4DvAsXvXMYdRr0odLYAlG+KvO7n+UTSSCLqIUN+16sD65iCLMQ3P8 WluKQZEMMOoR2PKodIl/d46w1He3cwH0AM0ACIho= In-Reply-To: <6960AAD0-85AD-4DB2-ACB8-B5CC7F0042FB@lepiller.eu> References: <0c74eedb3a07933206ed2127a2b26f433ab77b18.1624528372.git.public@yoctocell.xyz> <86lf6zxwec.fsf@posteo.net> <87a6nf9kef.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> <86k0mjxcwx.fsf@posteo.net> <875yy2joab.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> <86fsx6xmwx.fsf@posteo.net> <8735t6jjnl.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> <6960AAD0-85AD-4DB2-ACB8-B5CC7F0042FB@lepiller.eu> Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 14:39:44 +0200 Message-ID: <87zgvei0dr.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 2.9 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Fri, Jun 25 2021, Julien Lepiller wrote: > Hi, what matters is that patches focus on one thing, and one one. I > agree with Adu here, we should make sure uri anl uri-sexp are the same > version. If you really don't want to do that in this se [...] Content analysis details: (2.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.9 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Fri, Jun 25 2021, Julien Lepiller wrote: > Hi, what matters is that patches focus on one thing, and one one. I > agree with Adu here, we should make sure uri anl uri-sexp are the same > version. If you really don't want to do that in this se [...] Content analysis details: (2.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD 1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jun 25 2021, Julien Lepiller wrote: > Hi, what matters is that patches focus on one thing, and one one. I > agree with Adu here, we should make sure uri anl uri-sexp are the same > version. If you really don't want to do that in this series, send it > as another series, and make it blocking for this one. I'll try to > merge your work this week-end. Cool, I will send another series that updates =E2=80=98ocaml-uri=E2=80=99. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJJBAEBCAAzFiEEAVhh4yyK5+SEykIzrPUJmaL7XHkFAmDVzpAVHHB1YmxpY0B5 b2N0b2NlbGwueHl6AAoJEKz1CZmi+1x5Z+EP/itFJDmTdjCFe9wna7/mHA69TvJB gVkUhrHd54FUaftcIuwArCJVqS6TrjBNg1ZzQlAHovaXki3CSd0PqwaiB9dUJGgI W6Gu2BEGQ2aNebvgVj0f4Uw6Ildlda3sYXpsF0bAbH+4miZZxXDGRfJthH0/t5af XrZbYa8+sh77HnwJI0LjRlVnsDgCI2kKa+/gIKlM6SlpniDXrZNHVIorkHIha64i 4GuxpkgyLRrLThzSwObPhzHWzfRbiASL+yiBk7OAfZfGIvBn+gLAPftOYIpzkUUa Jr3qnKWihYLKpBupRG+ZvSjbRI3PUxFTEqdtSeKQEbhefSMKer/G9HUvxAsrFnUx LoO2Km8gNhMi6XA2P9kHr/OgiBVl+hRWAJm1PFBnbPsrKPUdIfDcFJQwns9LrINx ngvxU9TgowEVq+/y+B65iSwS5UKPzMwG+1IBl6rPIUqLjzJV64ehgYImZ9q406ZS zVgO4AgL1BsJ+fEz/RmW6mH/TU15WJjwmU5A6XRAB4qepB99bUJ9huP0jRZl520C +LlEFjMxVqE+yteCizXxuzgGJGiKTi+4tweLRQPJH8miy89iihF8IuhKGqtPd2+D 4jAZ7/Pqed9vLag/b28dC9QauGKJSnArxVN/o1XmTjH4TjgtuvWKSB3utJ81tikA BTCbVcjRlDSvGV/F =RTec -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From unknown Sun Jun 22 08:00:08 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#49203] [PATCH v2 0/2] Add ocaml-cohttp and dependencies Resent-From: Xinglu Chen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 13:08:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49203 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: 49203@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 49203-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49203.162462645013938 (code B ref 49203); Fri, 25 Jun 2021 13:08:01 +0000 Received: (at 49203) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jun 2021 13:07:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45116 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lwlYQ-0003ck-Km for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 09:07:30 -0400 Received: from h87-96-130-155.cust.a3fiber.se ([87.96.130.155]:35142 helo=mail.yoctocell.xyz) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lwlYL-0003cR-8A for 49203@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 09:07:29 -0400 From: Xinglu Chen DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=yoctocell.xyz; s=mail; t=1624626437; bh=TybNxkhgudZciC63PKnUUGb2wILFeSOb0KbSF6WZwKI=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=gPdWVv3Tn0TUWZ5i1l8oEwHJunNe/ACPFFgXs5ZzHDntDP0IBcGceP8st7FdB9Al1 5iONJn4MBHzGo6eX3E//79rhYAUBpDDs+hYg15dbLmXtOEWnZp39mX9r34mjaf2smg tJk+nw5IRzcFfJrU8z5rLc64nutGkFgtdGwTMM6E= In-Reply-To: References: Message-Id: Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 15:07:16 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 2.9 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Changes since v1: * Make =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=98ocaml-uri-sexp=E2=80=99?= inherit from =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=98ocaml-uri=E2=80=99?= which has been updated to version 4.2.0 once has been merged. Xinglu Chen (2): gnu: Add ocaml-uri-sexp. gnu: Add ocaml-cohttp. Content analysis details: (2.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.9 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Changes since v1: * Make =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=98ocaml-uri-sexp=E2=80=99?= inherit from =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=98ocaml-uri=E2=80=99?= which has been updated to version 4.2.0 once has been merged. Xinglu Chen (2): gnu: Add ocaml-uri-sexp. gnu: Add ocaml-cohttp. Content analysis details: (1.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Changes since v1: * Make =E2=80=98ocaml-uri-sexp=E2=80=99 inherit from =E2=80=98ocaml-uri=E2= =80=99 which has been updated to version 4.2.0 once has been merged. Xinglu Chen (2): gnu: Add ocaml-uri-sexp. gnu: Add ocaml-cohttp. gnu/packages/ocaml.scm | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+) base-commit: c2f71356a7996cc68c2f387d9d8f18ad85caa0c2 =2D-=20 2.32.0 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJJBAEBCAAzFiEEAVhh4yyK5+SEykIzrPUJmaL7XHkFAmDV1QQVHHB1YmxpY0B5 b2N0b2NlbGwueHl6AAoJEKz1CZmi+1x5sWcQAKn282iFC6QdaoVsQ2edXlNkExz+ sLuBT4moho/9KXKNq8OLKqqo+kBdkUezD1NnSYF+KieSy4Mg/1F9tTSCSKKKyZQ3 YSXJcMk2XH5eaQyzEXHfPq3WDwOSgqJmQ44F9142P8RKqqN6b2OOT4Tgzf6+KOoN /c/KdRzMLVF5WSsRx2cbKlwhMEETNuhWPNc2Qy8lkOAWKfrUN3jlerMizuiieGm+ JcIW8ZkdREImaM+evx1l441rwx8K5uPgsuPAh5d98GPG4vrM7WZituzViqpwJlBV XEE/wrzGYnRdY7HPR0i4ysIfWPpvoZdtj9ReRbYEMIKyerM7uQH6r4T66wWPO5kN V6ykknUIiykBbUNYvZrU34ATlfhhrPaw9xvJWmVrMzQjlAoRCWQNLBYqdf/lciNC 0r9NKJhAWELtCWA7EOTjKsm1IxsMIU2caJzptAmLKTsiZkbM38d2VOFKlbXbj8g+ ohxQGmyj64Pr8qH1UUgKhZmG7f0r+uanZhvuolgZx/mK1aFIW1ezT13JO/T2Qxo6 1m18OBBBAu4NtOM9ABnYaw1JVWB37g/dMZFXzinc8IaZB6kObHnnFtKH7glA7QiL eTYJaI50bRY3pJtUGmGvZCtoK+rJhc+Fv0RA+5DQuzJLA/+5RTpnOtRHhAtVwrc3 hJZOHRDS0t93VfYy =nZja -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From unknown Sun Jun 22 08:00:08 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#49203] [PATCH v2 1/2] gnu: Add ocaml-uri-sexp. Resent-From: Xinglu Chen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 13:08:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49203 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: 49203@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 49203-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49203.162462646713968 (code B ref 49203); Fri, 25 Jun 2021 13:08:02 +0000 Received: (at 49203) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jun 2021 13:07:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45120 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lwlYe-0003dC-R3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 09:07:47 -0400 Received: from h87-96-130-155.cust.a3fiber.se ([87.96.130.155]:35152 helo=mail.yoctocell.xyz) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lwlYY-0003cv-UR for 49203@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 09:07:43 -0400 From: Xinglu Chen DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=yoctocell.xyz; s=mail; t=1624626453; bh=Mu/63HSFh+68e3xATwdU7kRxlxrohb/PIQv34T2Uztc=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=cbGeXA1l1pMK661NDTbAT7CKvzESqQNyAUeRlAi1TMvGQfDuzg8YvUrDvuqMCLlt3 2haS9jaI1idIF3BsT3IdqEJsB17WJluCS30uLyd0Pjd+Ud9kAINr0ldhulIJY5fbRi VQGMTmzarVFz6RGIqi4jdBF+3UxuJpzIgOSyx0O8= In-Reply-To: References: Message-Id: Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 15:07:33 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 2.9 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: * gnu/packages/ocaml.scm (ocaml-uri-sexp): New variable. --- gnu/packages/ocaml.scm | 14 ++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) diff --git a/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm b/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm index 0eb63b94d4..60a14ce87c 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm @@ -7071,6 +7071,20 @@ Graphics.open_graph is [...] Content analysis details: (2.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.9 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: * gnu/packages/ocaml.scm (ocaml-uri-sexp): New variable. --- gnu/packages/ocaml.scm | 14 ++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) diff --git a/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm b/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm index 0eb63b94d4..60a14ce87c 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm @@ -7071,6 +7071,20 @@ Graphics.open_graph is [...] Content analysis details: (1.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager * gnu/packages/ocaml.scm (ocaml-uri-sexp): New variable. --- gnu/packages/ocaml.scm | 14 ++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) diff --git a/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm b/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm index 0eb63b94d4..60a14ce87c 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm @@ -7071,6 +7071,20 @@ Graphics.open_graph is called. This library used to be distributed with OCaml up to OCaml 4.08.") (license license:lgpl2.1+))) +(define-public ocaml-uri-sexp + (package + (inherit ocaml-uri) + (arguments + '(#:package "uri-sexp" + #:test-target ".")) + (propagated-inputs + `(("ocaml-uri" ,ocaml-uri) + ("ocaml-ppx-sexp-conv" ,ocaml-ppx-sexp-conv) + ("ocaml-sexplib0" ,ocaml-sexplib0))) + (native-inputs `(("ocaml-ounit" ,ocaml-ounit))) + (synopsis "RFC3986 URI/URL parsing library") + (description "This package adds S-exp support to @code{ocaml-uri}."))) + (define-public js-of-ocaml (package (name "js-of-ocaml") -- 2.32.0 From unknown Sun Jun 22 08:00:08 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#49203] [PATCH v2 2/2] gnu: Add ocaml-cohttp. Resent-From: Xinglu Chen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 13:08:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49203 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: 49203@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 49203-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49203.162462646913982 (code B ref 49203); Fri, 25 Jun 2021 13:08:02 +0000 Received: (at 49203) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jun 2021 13:07:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45122 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lwlYj-0003dR-2r for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 09:07:49 -0400 Received: from h87-96-130-155.cust.a3fiber.se ([87.96.130.155]:35160 helo=mail.yoctocell.xyz) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lwlYd-0003d1-Ou for 49203@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 09:07:47 -0400 From: Xinglu Chen DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=yoctocell.xyz; s=mail; t=1624626458; bh=0si1W+KMQRDLo5SH387EIYixyoHbUIe4t/WbCOEv3bc=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=LBw7A5swJA9zf6Xaio6vbKYybkjXhTZQKip4gldTmZ344u2+Pk3rExopJ995yBlYg KHErQXiLAZqi8al51hzQk20Dv1ohgd9TgjqvgExmJFc9BDibe0DcnNTsGktPdGe0G6 w0FiEX0WXVcPeRz/c2jwz0qAM6GxKUrm+Wqts3Us= In-Reply-To: References: Message-Id: Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 15:07:37 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 2.9 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: * gnu/packages/ocaml.scm (ocaml-cohttp): New variable. --- gnu/packages/ocaml.scm | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+) diff --git a/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm b/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm index 60a14ce87c..6d90044f4d 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm @@ -7085,6 +7085,44 @@ up to OCaml 4.08.") (s [...] Content analysis details: (2.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.9 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: * gnu/packages/ocaml.scm (ocaml-cohttp): New variable. --- gnu/packages/ocaml.scm | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+) diff --git a/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm b/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm index 60a14ce87c..6d90044f4d 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm @@ -7085,6 +7085,44 @@ up to OCaml 4.08.") (s [...] Content analysis details: (1.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager * gnu/packages/ocaml.scm (ocaml-cohttp): New variable. --- gnu/packages/ocaml.scm | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+) diff --git a/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm b/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm index 60a14ce87c..6d90044f4d 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm @@ -7085,6 +7085,44 @@ up to OCaml 4.08.") (synopsis "RFC3986 URI/URL parsing library") (description "This package adds S-exp support to @code{ocaml-uri}."))) +(define-public ocaml-cohttp + (package + (name "ocaml-cohttp") + (version "4.0.0") + (source + (origin + (method git-fetch) + (uri (git-reference + (url "https://github.com/mirage/ocaml-cohttp") + (commit (string-append "v" version)))) + (file-name (git-file-name name version)) + (sha256 + (base32 + "02d7417yy1i62by368w3wyw3756047pbrw69spcvz3cd1z7vqaci")))) + (build-system dune-build-system) + (arguments + '(#:package "cohttp" + #:test-target "cohttp_test/src")) + (propagated-inputs + `(("ocaml-re" ,ocaml-re) + ("ocaml-uri" ,ocaml-uri) + ("ocaml-uri-sexp" ,ocaml-uri-sexp) + ("ocaml-sexplib0" ,ocaml-sexplib0) + ("ocaml-ppx-sexp-conv" ,ocaml-ppx-sexp-conv) + ("ocaml-stringext" ,ocaml-stringext) + ("ocaml-base64" ,ocaml-base64))) + (native-inputs + `(("ocaml-fmt" ,ocaml-fmt) + ("ocaml-jsonm" ,ocaml-jsonm) + ("ocaml-alcotest" ,ocaml-alcotest))) + (home-page "https://github.com/mirage/ocaml-cohttp") + (synopsis "OCaml library for HTTP clients and servers") + (description + "Cohttp is an OCaml library for creating HTTP daemons. It has a portable +HTTP parser, and implementations using various asynchronous programming +libraries.") + (license license:isc))) + (define-public js-of-ocaml (package (name "js-of-ocaml") -- 2.32.0 From unknown Sun Jun 22 08:00:08 2025 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505) X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org From: help-debbugs@gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System) To: Xinglu Chen Subject: bug#49203: closed (Re: [bug#49203] [PATCH v2 0/2] Add ocaml-cohttp and dependencies) Message-ID: References: <20210627151729.6424458f@tachikoma.lepiller.eu> X-Gnu-PR-Message: they-closed 49203 X-Gnu-PR-Package: guix-patches X-Gnu-PR-Keywords: patch Reply-To: 49203@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2021 13:18:02 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1624799882-31110-1" This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1624799882-31110-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Your bug report #49203: [PATCH 0/2] Add ocaml-cohttp and dependencies which was filed against the guix-patches package, has been closed. The explanation is attached below, along with your original report. If you require more details, please reply to 49203@debbugs.gnu.org. --=20 49203: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D49203 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems ------------=_1624799882-31110-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 49203-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jun 2021 13:17:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49074 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lxUfK-00085D-15 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jun 2021 09:17:38 -0400 Received: from lepiller.eu ([89.234.186.109]:48120) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lxUfH-000853-OI for 49203-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jun 2021 09:17:37 -0400 Received: from lepiller.eu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lepiller.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id fc9eab94; Sun, 27 Jun 2021 13:17:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=lepiller.eu; h=date:from :to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=dkim; bh=U5CuqCFthNm2 9jkKKBB4hoLm2PgGGTYzv/4H53ZPDII=; b=Bt+D2b1JgDU8MjkHIbjBB03ZlE5r Lo+U1Bz6Fvm8Q2+7+meXyogDyQUKA3UZURrDsXdmsXQQFK6L9g+jhWthOg459tpX /2LAc9DcQTwo8XIZqYNb4nVXc5+bzCZ90o+gWWWetxHuHkQu/pe/m/iNYVddW03B WQqWDP/qCb5s/Ll8ebEQhqRwvCPlB6O/5GZdgxDYlTnWPqsmjM29uFC4ALyKppoE N2z87kf8+d+286zllPhMDnABzJoE7zd3E6N0DNAG/GnHKXrTX+/yznNTQGZ7MVo2 8r/LgmoA4YJ2TaiBA5jMyC8FKR5sqiErY78KOg5C64jU9KfDT6Gp7TaqOQ== Received: by lepiller.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 81fdf5e7 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Sun, 27 Jun 2021 13:17:32 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2021 15:17:29 +0200 From: Julien Lepiller To: Xinglu Chen Subject: Re: [bug#49203] [PATCH v2 0/2] Add ocaml-cohttp and dependencies Message-ID: <20210627151729.6424458f@tachikoma.lepiller.eu> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 49203-done Cc: 49203-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Pushed as e366b94f9fd1338a94e80e83d0b060fac65ad2f4 and 364b56124b88398c199aacbfd4fdfc9a1583e634, thank you! Note that in ocaml-uri-sexp, I added a name to the package, so it can be built from the CLI :) ------------=_1624799882-31110-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jun 2021 09:55:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42479 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lwM4k-00027l-La for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 05:55:10 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:33030) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lwM4i-00027b-T5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 05:55:09 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57054) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lwM4i-0001I8-Fj for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 05:55:08 -0400 Received: from h87-96-130-155.cust.a3fiber.se ([87.96.130.155]:45464 helo=mail.yoctocell.xyz) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lwM4f-0002GI-Q0 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2021 05:55:07 -0400 From: Xinglu Chen DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=yoctocell.xyz; s=mail; t=1624528497; bh=omgst3+wX4PBhNoa39BJZIIewaZ67u0Kq+j3kzXsgeA=; h=From:To:Subject:Date; b=aODJkXVv4EAp8vE8shBubG4qtsvAqzxQWsHbuL70eJrEppYfPMQXAszGyqUGXYaeB G/yb4NkY6tHst/R/XIzaqcesmkQZIKvHqI/ZR1sq9mQZNs6jieINgef6nYmQIOdFUZ qGb63qoE0mYLWHjj1WXUALsODYvV6tCLEJLqupec= To: guix-patches@gnu.org Subject: [PATCH 0/2] Add ocaml-cohttp and dependencies Message-Id: Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 11:54:48 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=87.96.130.155; envelope-from=public@yoctocell.xyz; helo=mail.yoctocell.xyz X-Spam_score_int: 29 X-Spam_score: 2.9 X-Spam_bar: ++ X-Spam_report: (2.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD=0.5, FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD_FP=1.499, PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD=1.999, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 2.7 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: This series adds ‘ocaml-cohttp’, an OCaml library HTTP clients and servers. Xinglu Chen (2): gnu: Add ocaml-uri-sexp. gnu: Add ocaml-cohttp. gnu/packages/ocaml.scm | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+) Content analysis details: (2.7 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)] -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, medium trust [209.51.188.17 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD_FP From abused NTLD 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This series adds =E2=80=98ocaml-cohttp=E2=80=99, an OCaml library HTTP clie= nts and servers. Xinglu Chen (2): gnu: Add ocaml-uri-sexp. gnu: Add ocaml-cohttp. gnu/packages/ocaml.scm | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+) base-commit: 3c86372e36cecaed1ad55675ce32a14b972406bf =2D-=20 2.32.0 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJJBAEBCAAzFiEEAVhh4yyK5+SEykIzrPUJmaL7XHkFAmDUVmgVHHB1YmxpY0B5 b2N0b2NlbGwueHl6AAoJEKz1CZmi+1x5LUIP/jQEk4ps+QGmqvEyV+zCbz0+Ahu6 pBtt4SSP6Aufpgk7NUYK1FW5/4XLj1HtgGLutQh6m1b8LU6J7nCRT52K5gkYDIVL Up969hOJe8EE6mWZdgXAGD4RZFFHJudO3EX93DLeRps8j58J7YUnHG+oAZ4KFzOl u8ds2tpyDE0R0XGmvECI44l7/H/IKFqOVVCSGUPbcQ4FK9uMIoZc7bkru3fH0AXi X4VbQu2B/WZHbEkyvBhtA9Zo3CVFLsmeE3fZwfyIEQe2yXoELUGUO3NeE89UX0lf faD/aIESpbSz0DYPWBU6u/6ILUFeMc+o/dZRlB31MI8eoXX9Mi2Kumkp7E0ClSSG cMfa6yHi3MNcLdIakqAeRawN0LUJZmpLwBh3d2BF4wQOGv50TxUSkNJv07euwptg lkE9xJWJckdPwUzbSmXHh6SgupdOxiPPlY918QwQWmhDPjZit4wVYYyOpxWa424b dOW4jw9y/44ciSDxn9zSkuWXPRyNO2rJ9WyiXhHmCYvRMhobBS6K2uIhXj6718Ct 4mLU/pRhbYIP9XnV5qFneoFw5+7V1xcSyjAN7HLXVgpaPyc1XqFD9P1RCfXMk9/R OHO67V0oFDFKXKmYbJMe/wzB7wtM4GP6bGDDLiTuITxLXf7pO9Qy0vkUyOe+fqCF cFrO+wbx7IW4nl2+ =h9/E -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- ------------=_1624799882-31110-1-- From unknown Sun Jun 22 08:00:08 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#49203] [PATCH v2 0/2] Add ocaml-cohttp and dependencies Resent-From: Xinglu Chen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2021 13:39:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49203 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Julien Lepiller Cc: 49203-done@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 49203-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D49203.1624801135817 (code D ref 49203); Sun, 27 Jun 2021 13:39:01 +0000 Received: (at 49203-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jun 2021 13:38:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49113 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lxUzv-0000D7-Nk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jun 2021 09:38:55 -0400 Received: from h87-96-130-155.cust.a3fiber.se ([87.96.130.155]:45744 helo=mail.yoctocell.xyz) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lxUzu-0000Cv-8V for 49203-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jun 2021 09:38:54 -0400 From: Xinglu Chen DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=yoctocell.xyz; s=mail; t=1624801128; bh=VbZAVlu2yb26yjCTjjzfq4kvRXSXE6lAaMjditFYcOI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=tkoYV4wv0YBR5qMifHuP44FIpw+fMz95lYhlcUuMwtVN+WUBTBAX7RxSMduFMRQMv sJ6zfCCJETQ0vqutZWprCQpUPTWN6Fy+KI9zoFrENmduNUygom+YOEUJFlMC65OOUQ PlI4o3YAYpMsSAlySi0k0720+PNQapJVNwrnQBCw= In-Reply-To: <20210627151729.6424458f@tachikoma.lepiller.eu> References: <20210627151729.6424458f@tachikoma.lepiller.eu> Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2021 15:38:47 +0200 Message-ID: <87fsx34ec8.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 2.9 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Sun, Jun 27 2021, Julien Lepiller wrote: > Pushed as > e366b94f9fd1338a94e80e83d0b060fac65ad2f4 > and 364b56124b88398c199aacbfd4fdfc9a1583e634, thank you! > > Note that in ocaml-uri-sexp, I added a name to the package, so it can > be built f [...] Content analysis details: (2.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.9 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Sun, Jun 27 2021, Julien Lepiller wrote: > Pushed as > e366b94f9fd1338a94e80e83d0b060fac65ad2f4 > and 364b56124b88398c199aacbfd4fdfc9a1583e634, thank you! > > Note that in ocaml-uri-sexp, I added a name to the package, so it can > be built f [...] Content analysis details: (2.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD 1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain On Sun, Jun 27 2021, Julien Lepiller wrote: > Pushed as > e366b94f9fd1338a94e80e83d0b060fac65ad2f4 > and 364b56124b88398c199aacbfd4fdfc9a1583e634, thank you! > > Note that in ocaml-uri-sexp, I added a name to the package, so it can > be built from the CLI :) Oh, good catch! :) --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJJBAEBCAAzFiEEAVhh4yyK5+SEykIzrPUJmaL7XHkFAmDYf2cVHHB1YmxpY0B5 b2N0b2NlbGwueHl6AAoJEKz1CZmi+1x55wEP/RUD01CBDpRvPTvH3A3rkqlj18qX tzTpIPMJJLA58IjJClIWfNi/tjczqZA40SZgmOp81ikzDEFtBBaslxOiu61hEe4b MFB2/SDv3rM7mM/ByN7AbxNZzFvX2IZq6a9v9b6u4J5LmaQMZDQsFCWHUF5SIXWn DKfU+gj+11LOdPGl6CA6ZyBLF8Aq+DqmiztFL6Le+/62pFi95vg5/8WRvOddE2Od g1/VevCNuKx05ENUxf/P3TFzlS8OEPw7LjS2U1JSbERx7dE9kmeeyLuGhH9BpJbz Loe+wz3V+jT3onjV9DUNkrgs7Dun8wKioAXuEVSkOyN5qUxvhdlwRzQ8n5aYrPQg BtCfILZBW2LfdWE8WoKloE5J1FBRXRzh0wsVwWnkakmQze/RXGOb/lbmkv3V1aoO ucoQOqoiVhde/IChRMWWKC6bc1DkvFuhPWogkHFfFzPXH57r/W6kyCRV4EvzNdXJ K5qppnUaM+xq2F6sYJi7i+128ivDHUuqNIHR35cFYcaiFHBGKFYqpkMwNvoU19tB xVMgdumsWq8Tfuv3kkBzl6yuux+tVzqY9iQALFUqy5aK2+klNYxw5tsePHfi+CFB nY4a9X218TLADtbZljhjhW1uLct8lqF2rBHgf7J3ZYbic+4BBo88CrN/2hFHobF8 STPK/VDMbIMmpSWw =kucG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--