From unknown Sun Jul 27 09:33:44 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#49171 <49171@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#49171 <49171@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: OCaml packages not building (due to updated python-pyyaml) Reply-To: bug#49171 <49171@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2025 16:33:44 +0000 retitle 49171 OCaml packages not building (due to updated python-pyyaml) reassign 49171 guix submitter 49171 pukkamustard severity 49171 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jun 22 13:02:21 2021 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Jun 2021 17:02:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39795 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lvjn3-0002Lu-3f for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 13:02:21 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:49314) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lvjn1-0002Ka-Dq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 13:02:19 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49550) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lvjn1-0003d4-5Q for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 13:02:19 -0400 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:58379) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lvjmu-0002rZ-5h for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 13:02:18 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBE6024002E for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 19:02:07 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1624381327; bh=4WlPvQ8KzZrvSSfW6B5ycNsmmiPIlcHOoLR9DxArF9A=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=jb8cH7AWr2Xl7+toXcaz/3by/j6VQ0KghPRdRQ5fxw1+h/fjme5HKpE4z2Y6VY4wN il4D/7Zfthz+SoTN6KK3w6Tbzpr1BDubec5esfumJVLqhdyrxkSf7Utm90BJwA0Jw4 Kdv7c0PBgjh0SrQ7SW1WVnPeoAh7nAsqaFaHpt9nmSildh8vXEosCQ929W/e0wzgJh hoU5mV6ZCweqznJUThwi6RKc3a2+mt+YSfW6TOywsiuK1rOIgHcbpi6G/t2gtFlEdX 3zyK85oBKI0laro+EJq0t/NhEBZTWMV2iRvfnOfvSBJrZpdpABv7dnpydi/F1KB0TU MynV2LzSSMc+w== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4G8XkR0stCz9rxB for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2021 19:02:06 +0200 (CEST) From: pukkamustard To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: OCaml packages not building (due to updated python-pyyaml) Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2021 16:47:07 +0000 Message-ID: <86r1gtygs3.fsf@posteo.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=pukkamustard@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) Hi Guix, With commit ac02d423d3fcb11048ee2e4a02626fca40cf1419, which updated python-pyyaml to 5.4.1 (from 5.3.1) lot of OCaml packages fail to build. This seems to be due to ocaml-dose3 that has python2-pyyaml as dependency for tests. ocaml-dose3 is a dependency of opam - a dependency of many OCaml packages. The output when trying to build ocaml-dose3: ---------------------------------------------------------- phase `build' succeeded after 14.5 seconds starting phase `check' /tmp/guix-build-ocaml-dose3-5.0.1.drv-0/dose3-5.0.1 ocamlbuild -j 10 applications/apps.otarget # No parallelism done make testlib make[1]: Entering directory '/tmp/guix-build-ocaml-dose3-5.0.1.drv-0/dose3-5.0.1' echo make[1]: Leaving directory '/tmp/guix-build-ocaml-dose3-5.0.1.drv-0/dose3-5.0.1' applications/dose-tests.py applications/dose-tests.list Traceback (most recent call last): File "applications/dose-tests.py", line 17, in warning('YAML C-library not available, falling back to python') NameError: name 'warning' is not defined make: *** [Makefile:206: test] Error 1 command "make" "test" "LIBDIR=/gnu/store/v939nvdn67cdgb7rjkyvplfw1qr2hkjl-ocaml-dose3-5.0.1/lib/ocaml/site-lib" failed with status 2 note: keeping build directory `/tmp/guix-build-ocaml-dose3-5.0.1.drv-3' builder for `/gnu/store/lybbyb38k0009jrbviymq88vi6xak5ii-ocaml-dose3-5.0.1.drv' failed with exit code 1 build of /gnu/store/lybbyb38k0009jrbviymq88vi6xak5ii-ocaml-dose3-5.0.1.drv failed View build log at '/var/log/guix/drvs/ly/bbyb38k0009jrbviymq88vi6xak5ii-ocaml-dose3-5.0.1.drv.bz2'. guix build: error: build of `/gnu/store/lybbyb38k0009jrbviymq88vi6xak5ii-ocaml-dose3-5.0.1.drv' failed ---------------------------------------------------------- This seems to also be what CI is encoutering: https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/623375/details Any ideas? Any other packages failing for the same reason? Would disabling tests for ocaml-dose3 be an acceptable quick hack? Cheers, pukkamustard From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jun 23 07:13:55 2021 Received: (at 49171) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Jun 2021 11:13:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40459 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lw0pP-0000FE-3P for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 07:13:55 -0400 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:44543) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lw0pN-0000Ef-2Z for 49171@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 07:13:53 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01799240100 for <49171@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 13:13:46 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1624446827; bh=UaCCAYxeZdXYc96R5Czj/Wx6CXNDNamkLGIoCAZukkA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=oszJjQKNcLsfP+/BLnyJk88PXnYE9ZfNbZbIt4ENMOPUec0aerJcgwmHcv5ek2mx6 RP9hdpNZwfttORuqGM3XTsKTEdUk12ZPi/Www+75gRHoaYODCCLGkZtn6f5f4+0aJZ szuOTA0XFxEO0Y9e45XVXiCdbVPpq7H8aZ6DA0DaLiEdljT1CIE6LWuwhkQ62X4oDp gfhUpJqHatk+dyRB/jSOzPr0HktoL4xfy/N290WerMsaFuu4ZoJD3KRGEPf2WL5K0F AwRc7mY43yWNqYEpq1qf1FXB4MKq+St7HyinGa1je3ctEFxdyy58X5cQaMl2w12Mlm xmqlMVXyu5Rig== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4G90y05V9Wz6tmH; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 13:13:44 +0200 (CEST) References: <4598abb91f7f610e062f34931fe988d04b5d43c1.1624438202.git.public@yoctocell.xyz> From: pukkamustard To: Xinglu Chen Subject: Re: [bug#49183] [PATCH] gnu: ocaml-dose3: Fix tests. Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 11:09:44 +0000 In-reply-to: <4598abb91f7f610e062f34931fe988d04b5d43c1.1624438202.git.public@yoctocell.xyz> Message-ID: <86pmwcygt4.fsf@posteo.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 49171 Cc: 49171@debbugs.gnu.org, 49183@debbugs.gnu.org, guix-patches@gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Neat. Thanks! Fixes the test and looks got to me. > No idea why one would use Python to test OCaml code... Yeah, makes one wonder. At least they've updated to Python3 (https://gitlab.com/irill/dose3/-/blob/master/CHANGES#L33) recently. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jun 23 08:46:02 2021 Received: (at 49171-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Jun 2021 12:46:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40521 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lw2GY-0004f6-Jl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 08:46:02 -0400 Received: from lepiller.eu ([89.234.186.109]:45588) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lw2GV-0004eS-8X; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 08:46:00 -0400 Received: from lepiller.eu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lepiller.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 80fea4e0; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 12:45:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=lepiller.eu; h=date:from :to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=dkim; bh=NpImpi2lgbmJ 8rFMXOvikswv5NyQlfDrOLG2j9991kw=; b=bpl7yAatktm6yV00Fw2zUl/GrXqK HShd6JzXhIAQmdM61qrpfoPsXRdLs7tADuj7nGH77O0kM7TkXAt4aqCUfpG8uXCC er7wav5KrwsRRKDuMnjlescs+gu72KZRIwALh3fBp2v0cMc9RhicovPOLby1KG9y 0W8CRkpy8mknp2wbz3uJwBwD0EJRWz+zEJGBATSXr8LxpGGxYKFrs5B/GVsEHzly qSIUZ+al9nUt3COYzPd3ZBXVtpdoWF7VYmGF6unAy4bvOKtSpWCwPY9OuV+6f1C5 E+yV2/DTRqtMrlkNwLQI6lygzQ/p2za1kueROe7GD5gjr7zzD5iJxZQkFQ== Received: by lepiller.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 0bd81fb3 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Wed, 23 Jun 2021 12:45:56 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 14:45:52 +0200 From: Julien Lepiller To: pukkamustard Subject: Re: [bug#49183] [PATCH] gnu: ocaml-dose3: Fix tests. Message-ID: <20210623144552.64b67204@tachikoma.lepiller.eu> In-Reply-To: <86pmwcygt4.fsf@posteo.net> References: <4598abb91f7f610e062f34931fe988d04b5d43c1.1624438202.git.public@yoctocell.xyz> <86pmwcygt4.fsf@posteo.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Le Wed, 23 Jun 2021 11:09:44 +0000, pukkamustard a écrit : > Neat. Thanks! > > Fixes the test and looks got to me. > > > No idea why one would use Python to test OCaml code... > > Yeah, makes one wonder. At least they've updated to Python3 > (https://gitlab.c [...] Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 2.0 PDS_TONAME_EQ_TOLOCAL_SHORT Short body with To: name matches everything in local email X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 49171-done Cc: 49183-done@debbugs.gnu.org, 49171-done@debbugs.gnu.org, Xinglu Chen X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) Le Wed, 23 Jun 2021 11:09:44 +0000, pukkamustard a =C3=A9crit : > Neat. Thanks! >=20 > Fixes the test and looks got to me. >=20 > > No idea why one would use Python to test OCaml code... =20 > =20 > Yeah, makes one wonder. At least they've updated to Python3=20 > (https://gitlab.com/irill/dose3/-/blob/master/CHANGES#L33)=20 > recently. >=20 >=20 >=20 Thanks! Pushed as 91b29aa37394b660117e1d79927621db1344b7fe. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jul 04 09:15:15 2021 Received: (at 49171) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jul 2021 13:15:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40553 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m01xo-0002xG-Qi for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jul 2021 09:15:15 -0400 Received: from h87-96-130-155.cust.a3fiber.se ([87.96.130.155]:47368 helo=mail.yoctocell.xyz) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m01xj-0002wE-Ue for 49171@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jul 2021 09:15:11 -0400 From: Xinglu Chen DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=yoctocell.xyz; s=mail; t=1625404500; bh=Y2sq1m/qxrRcAQkuFUCti4AngYbHFhoHW0XtUt5i6tk=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=dWk9ov1XTn82v4ifOryA/AidDIH1rScumIudWXWlluOkvu4kCJTVGlSgFTvy98LyF I1zqZOs/Lg/u1vsJdm12zToL3uMpYbtUi/ouUzwKsaPLSFygXoXg8fEtGs1htAFUxi 2/OXPYdcNomLHnuIvPRajbgSh6AjUiIlt7nxkJI8= To: pukkamustard , 49171@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#49171: OCaml packages not building (due to updated python-pyyaml) In-Reply-To: <86r1gtygs3.fsf@posteo.net> References: <86r1gtygs3.fsf@posteo.net> Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2021 15:14:54 +0200 Message-ID: <8735sujk4x.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 2.9 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Tue, Jun 22 2021, pukkamustard wrote: > Hi Guix, > > With commit ac02d423d3fcb11048ee2e4a02626fca40cf1419, which > updated python-pyyaml to 5.4.1 (from 5.3.1) lot of OCaml packages > fail to build. > > This seems to be due to ocaml-dose3 [...] Content analysis details: (2.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD 0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS 0.0 PDS_RDNS_DYNAMIC_FP RDNS_DYNAMIC with FP steps X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 49171 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.9 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Tue, Jun 22 2021, pukkamustard wrote: > Hi Guix, > > With commit ac02d423d3fcb11048ee2e4a02626fca40cf1419, which > updated python-pyyaml to 5.4.1 (from 5.3.1) lot of OCaml packages > fail to build. > > This seems to be due to ocaml-dose3 [...] Content analysis details: (2.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD 1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD 0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager 0.0 PDS_RDNS_DYNAMIC_FP RDNS_DYNAMIC with FP steps --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jun 22 2021, pukkamustard wrote: > Hi Guix, > > With commit ac02d423d3fcb11048ee2e4a02626fca40cf1419, which=20 > updated python-pyyaml to 5.4.1 (from 5.3.1) lot of OCaml packages=20 > fail to build. > > This seems to be due to ocaml-dose3 that has python2-pyyaml as=20 > dependency for tests. ocaml-dose3 is a dependency of opam - a=20 > dependency of many OCaml packages. > > The output when trying to build ocaml-dose3: > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > phase `build' succeeded after 14.5 seconds > starting phase `check' > /tmp/guix-build-ocaml-dose3-5.0.1.drv-0/dose3-5.0.1 > ocamlbuild -j 10 applications/apps.otarget > # No parallelism done > make testlib > make[1]: Entering directory=20 > '/tmp/guix-build-ocaml-dose3-5.0.1.drv-0/dose3-5.0.1' > echo > > make[1]: Leaving directory=20 > '/tmp/guix-build-ocaml-dose3-5.0.1.drv-0/dose3-5.0.1' > applications/dose-tests.py applications/dose-tests.list > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "applications/dose-tests.py", line 17, in > warning('YAML C-library not available, falling back to=20 > python') > NameError: name 'warning' is not defined > make: *** [Makefile:206: test] Error 1 > command "make" "test"=20 > "LIBDIR=3D/gnu/store/v939nvdn67cdgb7rjkyvplfw1qr2hkjl-ocaml-dose3-5.0.1/l= ib/ocaml/site-lib"=20 > failed with status 2 > note: keeping build directory=20 > `/tmp/guix-build-ocaml-dose3-5.0.1.drv-3' > builder for=20 > `/gnu/store/lybbyb38k0009jrbviymq88vi6xak5ii-ocaml-dose3-5.0.1.drv'=20 > failed with exit code 1 > build of=20 > /gnu/store/lybbyb38k0009jrbviymq88vi6xak5ii-ocaml-dose3-5.0.1.drv=20 > failed > View build log at=20 > '/var/log/guix/drvs/ly/bbyb38k0009jrbviymq88vi6xak5ii-ocaml-dose3-5.0.1.d= rv.bz2'. > guix build: error: build of=20 > `/gnu/store/lybbyb38k0009jrbviymq88vi6xak5ii-ocaml-dose3-5.0.1.drv'=20 > failed > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > This seems to also be what CI is encoutering:=20 > https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/623375/details > > Any ideas? Any other packages failing for the same reason? > > Would disabling tests for ocaml-dose3 be an acceptable quick hack? > > Cheers, > pukkamustard I think this was fixed in commit 91b29aa37394b660117e1d79927621db1344b7fe (gnu: ocaml-dose3: Fix tests.), do you think we can close the issue? --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJJBAEBCAAzFiEEAVhh4yyK5+SEykIzrPUJmaL7XHkFAmDhtE4VHHB1YmxpY0B5 b2N0b2NlbGwueHl6AAoJEKz1CZmi+1x5T+QP/0SSD3eV7GGKQozFWuSQxp62qmto WnGXssRjivQdvZF0UtLAuKszMrkBY1qlPUmZ6hJUv+UrBT6a9vkiXRyhWwvB8/bK FpQPPwfNE7N+Nn6n0Y+OGBZ2rZ0gE+3QX76x5DWOvvNRHQlvZ7WzsEcb8J9RmYcu zGkksuYaDwnRaaK0XBJXGdYb7Fpty+lesV+CNFEtcATAy7lxPVnqXtKLwt2haCx3 TZH7UXM4RSg1tca5bNXZbnAh5iJC2Fxn+Aceg5+uhgA6svsq8U0OSuGodJPEpw+c TiuMEJy0D910bJdcmPzTC1y/UEg/jPZxG+vUe1V837zb6fSaqTZZf7mfj26I38Zq 5hF/K5T3e3kqHLH/Ea6JWECSufTskLqhX+FQoOnSantedEzPWTBFydxqkBM1cZ2O KVQmN2eTVphVHSQWXTylSsMx2jEDalPkp0Cw+l919q0NsTDbEcDc6+7NF/E8vcog fU4aUr+Kep1kfb+KOdpdxrpVfTYqtZHyZ1DeMQBlulFG9mhzOqJj9c3KA3nCRQqv tGH+xbxzfCZ+wHnfdxelW66PY2jgbm/oOYo6rWL9Yk+1Xr2TNmb8E8JF5tCAJPcj aR37CEUBzFEPy2w50ZiJZgTcBlojfG6QuMMgqMbgJ/v78vdOvy30bIeseHbjRZu8 1ciUbwfoYWKbLbXL =cXdU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jul 04 17:30:47 2021 Received: (at 49171) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jul 2021 21:30:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43340 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m09hL-0006QS-UV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jul 2021 17:30:47 -0400 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:55747) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m09hG-0006QB-DQ for 49171@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jul 2021 17:30:42 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0168F2400E5 for <49171@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 4 Jul 2021 23:30:31 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1625434232; bh=NVyyKV8NHdI+vOKrbGzBVSJR5gzL5R7oWXeOI24yZ4g=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=o02kt+lWwS38Og/+2J6opUSoRtNGjBwpnZVF/n9KaqHiCafD/KJWZFDnckgDkA6Z3 RKhBBvSNF0Uh3PuzWk0V7j9TU8hDuPwLTLuLmRsDYco8vxqSTJCjaJAw8WzFFEL58M R4f9mjadGhECvXVbyk9XtU/203V93hWIFwfhIIA9EQTRAbYCtfOzmFFbC9tk23scM0 cui3qhcv+x9cs4w3FTk/dZ9sZktgAntTZzbdEq3q2CRtHeFyA3JVy5DSyRITLNvlOw vHpGcmSCEmYbDSFDS02QafMnwdbdq/IgX2RV5JOczdeHoXKmTqctok3Dhwt+IhceZQ 4RbVdi2x2vjMw== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4GJ26Z4nWQz6tmF; Sun, 4 Jul 2021 23:30:30 +0200 (CEST) References: <86r1gtygs3.fsf@posteo.net> <8735sujk4x.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> From: pukkamustard To: Xinglu Chen Subject: Re: bug#49171: OCaml packages not building (due to updated python-pyyaml) Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2021 21:23:18 +0000 In-reply-to: <8735sujk4x.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> Message-ID: <86h7h9lqc2.fsf@posteo.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Xinglu Chen writes: > I think this was fixed in commit > 91b29aa37394b660117e1d79927621db1344b7fe (gnu: ocaml-dose3: Fix > tests.), > do you think we can close the issue? Yup, was fixed and already closed by Julien (see https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=49171#13). Content analysis details: (1.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [185.67.36.66 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4 RBL: Very Good reputation (+4) [185.67.36.66 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 49171 Cc: 49171@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) Xinglu Chen writes: > I think this was fixed in commit > 91b29aa37394b660117e1d79927621db1344b7fe (gnu: ocaml-dose3: Fix > tests.), > do you think we can close the issue? Yup, was fixed and already closed by Julien (see https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=49171#13). From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jul 05 13:11:01 2021 Received: (at 49171) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jul 2021 17:11:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46616 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m0S7Z-0000qC-6V for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jul 2021 13:11:01 -0400 Received: from h87-96-130-155.cust.a3fiber.se ([87.96.130.155]:59084 helo=mail.yoctocell.xyz) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m0S7X-0000pw-4j for 49171@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jul 2021 13:10:59 -0400 From: Xinglu Chen DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=yoctocell.xyz; s=mail; t=1625505052; bh=7VxTwjRuCM4+kcz+b6j5nwyZKah0R4Juq/8stKVQWNk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=M7Bjol4e8ZAeJu8taZlFDDOcCyFinpmBXaK75KddHy/NUK4Jx+cPmAHAvLejWa5OQ QP7CmOghr4XSJ4pP3PHMRNDD6jC24HbjwrxNg2sntsoELgrBoK6jXDW1ZxYXt6HvK/ C5zH/Spy3yc6iIcRDspOVj/NMmS2ZixpLJ2dA0AQ= To: pukkamustard Subject: Re: bug#49171: OCaml packages not building (due to updated python-pyyaml) In-Reply-To: <86h7h9lqc2.fsf@posteo.net> References: <86r1gtygs3.fsf@posteo.net> <8735sujk4x.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> <86h7h9lqc2.fsf@posteo.net> Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2021 19:10:27 +0200 Message-ID: <877di4it4s.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 2.9 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Sun, Jul 04 2021, pukkamustard wrote: > Xinglu Chen writes: > >> I think this was fixed in commit >> 91b29aa37394b660117e1d79927621db1344b7fe (gnu: ocaml-dose3: Fix >> tests.), >> do you think we can close the issue [...] Content analysis details: (2.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD 0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS 0.0 PDS_RDNS_DYNAMIC_FP RDNS_DYNAMIC with FP steps X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 49171 Cc: 49171@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.9 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Sun, Jul 04 2021, pukkamustard wrote: > Xinglu Chen writes: > >> I think this was fixed in commit >> 91b29aa37394b660117e1d79927621db1344b7fe (gnu: ocaml-dose3: Fix >> tests.), >> do you think we can close the issue [...] Content analysis details: (2.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD 1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD 0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS 0.0 PDS_RDNS_DYNAMIC_FP RDNS_DYNAMIC with FP steps -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jul 04 2021, pukkamustard wrote: > Xinglu Chen writes: > >> I think this was fixed in commit >> 91b29aa37394b660117e1d79927621db1344b7fe (gnu: ocaml-dose3: Fix=20 >> tests.), >> do you think we can close the issue? > > Yup, was fixed and already closed by Julien (see=20 > https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D49171#13). Oh, I didn=E2=80=99t check the Web UI, sorry for the noise. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJJBAEBCAAzFiEEAVhh4yyK5+SEykIzrPUJmaL7XHkFAmDjPQMVHHB1YmxpY0B5 b2N0b2NlbGwueHl6AAoJEKz1CZmi+1x5f3YQAKHa9LiBBLwdvvEtSVItpgWHyzIR WJP5vedWZLRCAX6oSOnewI00zeJXm1fRoUoYJndfImKx8+ATMmjFru/szYoISqMk fqIHIMt6iRwpsplCpLp/gIWRBNuQ4IFSU3g5amKPsE58jtRUIEE24oeM2zph8zeg ZE0a+AbvG1CpRYOMoDx0J7iKK6BSfHyXp10BPN5z1INyY9kdglnKcmYP+kAphguX fzuUybZwU9ieogMPbvd4TfOfMmazoM8bkR5klo51qCMRYv59WkGTRLvvXXx8yC+w gEJfpYaPNaU/ZOBpnIbEH+InenAS7opx4507EPv0BWhzNArVl+e48e4gQMDT+kHn reE4w1HaBGqp5cq3VbcY/wf8mGVK9NUaaraGWkUPh2/upE3eJRVXB2GAmQj1TyGy rcP8LdEq7gT8znGpZb2d/lt5h2sXdY/AtG+ZTmLqH8EeyhWDNZzVjSLn4cVR/3au R5W9nH3YusEuPkjj5izKQB2PTcbHGdPZTOvoL8bdoRb/ojVIA7TQ1krP5YWMwVsn UFrSmZC9jfMwCPlyWud9OQObz1ymJGgVyyZw0DIoZRx25ByyIGKG21BgmNr0nNo6 PY2R9AKvk0CgI5N9hJxsdXEMD9Q8I9jBToL9ecUd9fcMNxjUoXZwhJam80CtGVYS iLLc7K2bfGvAaaBF =F8r7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From unknown Sun Jul 27 09:33:44 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2021 11:24:08 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator