GNU bug report logs -
#49149
[PATCH 0/7] Add deb format for guix pack.
Previous Next
Full log
Message #130 received at 49149 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hello,
Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> writes:
> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> skribis:
>
>> Instead of just naming them by their pack type, add information from the
>> package(s) they contain to make it easier to differentiate them.
>>
>> * guix/scripts/pack.scm (define-with-source): New macro.
>> (manifest->friendly-name): Extract procedure from ...
>> (docker-image): ... here, now defined via the above macro. Adjust REPOSITORY
>> argument value accordingly.
>> (guix-pack): Derive NAME using MANIFEST->FRIENDLY-NAME.
>
> [...]
>
>> - (define tag
>> - ;; Compute a meaningful "repository" name, which will show up in
>> - ;; the output of "docker images".
>> - (let ((manifest (profile-manifest #$profile)))
>> - (let loop ((names (map manifest-entry-name
>> - (manifest-entries manifest))))
>> - (define str (string-join names "-"))
>> - (if (< (string-length str) 40)
>> - str
>> - (match names
>> - ((_) str)
>> - ((names ... _) (loop names))))))) ;drop one entry
>
> I think this should not be factorized because the requirements are very
> Docker-dependent. Once factorized, it becomes easy to overlook this.
Hmm, I'm not a docker format expert, but my quick reading about it
turned no restrictions about what a docker image label should look like?
So perhaps it is not specially Docker-dependent.
If there's something truly Docker-dependent about it I'd suggest adding
a #:docker-compatible? boolean option to the procedure.
Maxim
This bug report was last modified 4 years and 42 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.