From unknown Fri Jun 20 07:13:29 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#49090 <49090@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#49090 <49090@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: [PATCH] gnu: Add blastem. Reply-To: bug#49090 <49090@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 14:13:29 +0000 retitle 49090 [PATCH] gnu: Add blastem. reassign 49090 guix-patches submitter 49090 Leo Prikler severity 49090 normal tag 49090 patch thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jun 18 11:00:25 2021 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jun 2021 15:00:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57597 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1luFyq-00013V-Lq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 11:00:24 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:38214) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1luFyo-00013N-EH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 11:00:23 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60426) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1luFyl-00042C-CV for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 11:00:19 -0400 Received: from mailrelay.tugraz.at ([129.27.2.202]:48110) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1luFyg-00076c-Uh for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 11:00:18 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (62-116-34-49.adsl.highway.telekom.at [62.116.34.49]) by mailrelay.tugraz.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4G62CW6wQGz3xq1 for ; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 17:00:07 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tugraz.at; s=mailrelay; t=1624028408; bh=kZ0fVSF3qBO6h8TLwLjJKqq35L/XDGxUTlkyaDcSpZw=; h=From:To:Subject:Date; b=BxyTz17QjV/dc+X5F6qUaQna1rYmx2ReAsn20EbFAQdV7WALYB2kne2hb1e4TYjwA 6WkwSoHyIVUKRmtB8mi+tO08o8wMlxTMtoyMmQT3s7drulz3f5Su8GF/xVmu6Kb2W7 XWhlccj5gUTvOcj7ljkxUVuppWc2L4zhPRbYhBU8= From: Leo Prikler To: guix-patches@gnu.org Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add blastem. Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 16:59:27 +0200 Message-Id: <20210618145926.6952-1-leo.prikler@student.tugraz.at> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.32.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TUG-Backscatter-control: bt4lQm5Tva3SBgCuw0EnZw X-Spam-Scanner: SpamAssassin 3.003001 X-Spam-Score-relay: -1.9 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.74 on 129.27.10.117 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=129.27.2.202; envelope-from=leo.prikler@student.tugraz.at; helo=mailrelay.tugraz.at X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) * gnu/packages/emulators.scm (blastem): New variable. --- gnu/packages/emulators.scm | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+) diff --git a/gnu/packages/emulators.scm b/gnu/packages/emulators.scm index ec8d3d21d6..1f1e726d8d 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/emulators.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/emulators.scm @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ #:use-module (guix download) #:use-module (guix git-download) #:use-module (guix svn-download) + #:use-module (guix hg-download) #:use-module (guix utils) #:use-module (gnu packages) #:use-module (gnu packages algebra) @@ -141,6 +142,72 @@ C610/C510). An extra emulator is provided for C64 expanded with the CMD SuperCPU.") (license license:gpl2+))) +(define-public blastem + (package + (name "blastem") + (version "0.6.2") + (source (origin + (method hg-fetch) + (uri (hg-reference + (url "https://www.retrodev.com/repos/blastem") + (changeset (string-append "v" version)))) + (file-name (string-append name "-" version "-checkout")) + (sha256 + (base32 + "08ycfisivh9rb9vmijlrpdryaw8spd81ck48960p15cnf8h2535q")) + (modules '((guix build utils))) + (snippet + '(begin + ;; TODO: Separately package and unbundle nuklear + (delete-file-recursively "zlib"))))) + (build-system gnu-build-system) + (arguments + `(#:make-flags (list (string-append "CC=" ,(cc-for-target)) + "HOST_ZLIB=1" + "HAS_PROC=-DHAS_PROC" + (string-append "CONFIG_PATH=" + %output "/share/blastem") + (string-append "DATA_PATH=" + %output "/share/blastem")) + #:tests? #f ; No check target and custom tests don't seem to build + #:imported-modules + ((guix build copy-build-system) + ,@%gnu-build-system-modules) + #:modules + (((guix build copy-build-system) + #:prefix copy:) + (guix build gnu-build-system) + (guix build utils)) + #:phases + (modify-phases %standard-phases + (add-after 'unpack 'fix-source + (lambda _ + (substitute* (find-files "." ".*\\.[ch]") + (("\"zlib/zlib.h\"") "")))) + (delete 'configure) + (replace 'install + (lambda* args + (apply (assoc-ref copy:%standard-phases 'install) + #:install-plan + '(("." "bin" #:include ("blastem" "vgmplay")) + ("." "share/blastem" + #:include ("default.cfg" "rom.db") + #:exclude ("android")) + ("shaders" "share/blastem/shaders")) + args)))))) + (inputs + `(("glew" ,glew) + ("mesa" ,mesa) + ("sdl2" ,sdl2) + ("zlib" ,zlib))) + (native-inputs + `(("pkg-config" ,pkg-config))) + (home-page "https://www.retrodev.com/blastem/") + (synopsis "Genesis/Mega Drive emulator") + (description "Blastem is an emulator for the Sega Genesis/Mega Drive +console.") + (license license:gpl3+))) + (define-public desmume (package (name "desmume") -- 2.32.0 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jun 18 14:39:41 2021 Received: (at 49090) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jun 2021 18:39:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58188 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1luJP3-0006tP-00 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 14:39:41 -0400 Received: from h87-96-130-155.cust.a3fiber.se ([87.96.130.155]:50924 helo=mail.yoctocell.xyz) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1luJP1-0006tB-6N for 49090@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 14:39:39 -0400 From: Xinglu Chen DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=yoctocell.xyz; s=mail; t=1624041571; bh=I5g00NLZx9Vfjk+K9/dhKel3UAxg/ZzisiOONeNM3o4=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=pEG4o5Qa7bUWt55KNU1k4nKEoXES25mjTkjOKNh49CUFfc8BBcZ3vSIjhfPOQrWR2 QqkT/fAzpOVWl8EKDzEyCDRgcPQ3KCkBGxUoyFPE4nWH7kdGB3cHTX07q/CH6nZlrZ UJsnIrEihOx7YGN1v2gGwSnNMKuCjEDb62NIqbKw= To: Leo Prikler , 49090@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: [bug#49090] [PATCH] gnu: Add blastem. In-Reply-To: <20210618145926.6952-1-leo.prikler@student.tugraz.at> References: <20210618145926.6952-1-leo.prikler@student.tugraz.at> Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 20:39:25 +0200 Message-ID: <87sg1f586a.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 2.9 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Fri, Jun 18 2021, Leo Prikler wrote: > +(define-public blastem > + (package > + (name "blastem") > + (version "0.6.2") > + (source (origin > + (method hg-fetch) > + (uri (hg-reference > + (url "https://www.retrodev.com/repos/blastem") > [...] Content analysis details: (2.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD 0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 49090 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.9 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Fri, Jun 18 2021, Leo Prikler wrote: > +(define-public blastem > + (package > + (name "blastem") > + (version "0.6.2") > + (source (origin > + (method hg-fetch) > + (uri (hg-reference > + (url "https://www.retrodev.com/repos/blastem") > [...] Content analysis details: (2.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD 0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS 1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jun 18 2021, Leo Prikler wrote: > +(define-public blastem > + (package > + (name "blastem") > + (version "0.6.2") > + (source (origin > + (method hg-fetch) > + (uri (hg-reference > + (url "https://www.retrodev.com/repos/blastem") > + (changeset (string-append "v" version)))) > + (file-name (string-append name "-" version "-checkout")) Nit: (guix hg-download) provides a =E2=80=98hg-file-name=E2=80=99 procedure= , so you can just use (hg-file-name name version). > + (sha256 > + (base32 > + "08ycfisivh9rb9vmijlrpdryaw8spd81ck48960p15cnf8h2535q")) > + (modules '((guix build utils))) > + (snippet > + '(begin > + ;; TODO: Separately package and unbundle nuklear > + (delete-file-recursively "zlib"))))) Why is the zlib directory removed? Or perhaps, why do they bundle their own Zlib? --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJJBAEBCAAzFiEEAVhh4yyK5+SEykIzrPUJmaL7XHkFAmDM6F0VHHB1YmxpY0B5 b2N0b2NlbGwueHl6AAoJEKz1CZmi+1x5nvsP/3G08qnhJwgu6HCc7egNXfayy3iX 7ldu+7z8EpdwrRNMndDfii8EAtfI+uLMrMsKy/DaHEYWCfQ+fD/3El0uRovaZzcH SPL0b0q3nC3TJiBFuebJl3Iz0LBlnG9YrycNPD9yyQq/qz9RxTOop9nZQo94ijoT yIDukp7SQGrtkRVSQfrxqbNHu/YNqpKw23NG826n0Da70NEzrckYW8niRkLzQcio T6jRlPhILorbtzwPhi+UKsz6K2RNLXuGEjma+a+8GUR3uvqmUAdiYRHy8XDJZ3jG K0pfDNHb0lrUSV+y9jPJdxl8ds/UKmCi5d3JG/i2wxFTeh6B9rD3Y4ndY6S72PyI vdfDb8cBq9FkzCD6aPD9cTauHYXuYUxqshYAM93W59AHxbzdKFPcXFH5mBmliU2+ 28+ct4DtwqMEMNitJWyaa8skNdtsH12rQxecz7zn8HCmnjNt9JOEA1Rzh4dAcx9l L7Hp+gqYmTvvoxZ6ffDDCOhg3jtTf9+lT4VhM8VapdBGUzmvs4VdF54+a1F1QQkf eACAp9PEThLQbK/s35T/RZPBVMEOM7FqmVKjjgVdN07cOCh0tiXQrsDLMXkI6A0t z1i8Vx7Lsn7mWp3LGZGW2qUzuK0rgSZlW67cjWgTKxN8teYRNe/68AOvRlJBcuOh U+luaF4ydwTvxvPd =zFdD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jun 18 15:15:58 2021 Received: (at 49090) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jun 2021 19:15:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58239 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1luJyA-0001XD-Js for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 15:15:58 -0400 Received: from mailrelay.tugraz.at ([129.27.2.202]:31215) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1luJy8-0001X4-MF for 49090@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 15:15:57 -0400 Received: from [10.0.0.4] (62-116-34-49.adsl.highway.telekom.at [62.116.34.49]) by mailrelay.tugraz.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4G67tc5tpGz3wYd; Fri, 18 Jun 2021 21:15:52 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tugraz.at; s=mailrelay; t=1624043753; bh=j2vMgcj5df2Ry95M9OI839nYSo45EAy2ENglZ91L8+4=; h=Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=Uak8J/a8d41knt/UtJ+ep+js/4LAj+PF+Qh5Rvv2PhDt40gqEMGZySStbHFgRBfWv qsx2Pia6hFDcWeNWWTbjcPxMXuVP2MkP19fWBFMnNQiA7jP9wipmujKsevr61ru60D jdeHLQ2BOGxqXXiAVAajgfQfEDW+vMOrAM8O9L18= Message-ID: <05ad84f8282a8046aa5ce81699806d835b7af908.camel@student.tugraz.at> Subject: Re: [bug#49090] [PATCH] gnu: Add blastem. From: Leo Prikler To: Xinglu Chen , 49090@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 21:15:31 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87sg1f586a.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> References: <20210618145926.6952-1-leo.prikler@student.tugraz.at> <87sg1f586a.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TUG-Backscatter-control: bt4lQm5Tva3SBgCuw0EnZw X-Spam-Scanner: SpamAssassin 3.003001 X-Spam-Score-relay: -1.9 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.74 on 129.27.10.116 X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 49090 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Am Freitag, den 18.06.2021, 20:39 +0200 schrieb Xinglu Chen: > On Fri, Jun 18 2021, Leo Prikler wrote: > > > +(define-public blastem > > + (package > > + (name "blastem") > > + (version "0.6.2") > > + (source (origin > > + (method hg-fetch) > > + (uri (hg-reference > > + (url "https://www.retrodev.com/repos/blastem") > > + (changeset (string-append "v" version)))) > > + (file-name (string-append name "-" version "- > > checkout")) > > Nit: (guix hg-download) provides a ‘hg-file-name’ procedure, so you > can just use (hg-file-name name version). Good to know, I simply used the hg-reference... expansion from etc/snippets, so that should probably be updated. > > > + (sha256 > > + (base32 > > + "08ycfisivh9rb9vmijlrpdryaw8spd81ck48960p15cnf8h25 > > 35q")) > > + (modules '((guix build utils))) > > + (snippet > > + '(begin > > + ;; TODO: Separately package and unbundle nuklear > > + (delete-file-recursively "zlib"))))) > > Why is the zlib directory removed? Or perhaps, why do they bundle > their own Zlib? The have their own PNG implementation, which appears different from libpng. So zlib exists as a dependency of that, but it's also #included elsewhere. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jun 19 04:30:20 2021 Received: (at 49090) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Jun 2021 08:30:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58498 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1luWMu-0004tc-He for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Jun 2021 04:30:20 -0400 Received: from h87-96-130-155.cust.a3fiber.se ([87.96.130.155]:39820 helo=mail.yoctocell.xyz) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1luWMr-0004jQ-Qk for 49090@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Jun 2021 04:30:19 -0400 From: Xinglu Chen DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=yoctocell.xyz; s=mail; t=1624091405; bh=Atbwe6Q3PCOAPya4E2UKmeB4N3Jor8kixYIbNItmA30=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=WZiDSgRGzf39JiBWFbhZuivz5DnollwjL0HJicQb+V6/5TeugXOMRf24IngI//u5n 7PMW7zm3Q+9CTSNNQ/C0YfybPvXH1Xp72unPrYs9/sEfUwXCL5I2LSIywUNgkT++/F ZU1/RiW8/kljk3Y1zraRYO/mkOsk3kdgaVmXwmLM= To: Leo Prikler , 49090@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: [bug#49090] [PATCH] gnu: Add blastem. In-Reply-To: <05ad84f8282a8046aa5ce81699806d835b7af908.camel@student.tugraz.at> References: <20210618145926.6952-1-leo.prikler@student.tugraz.at> <87sg1f586a.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> <05ad84f8282a8046aa5ce81699806d835b7af908.camel@student.tugraz.at> Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2021 10:30:03 +0200 Message-ID: <87fsxe45pw.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: 2.9 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Fri, Jun 18 2021, Leo Prikler wrote: > Am Freitag, den 18.06.2021, 20:39 +0200 schrieb Xinglu Chen: >> On Fri, Jun 18 2021, Leo Prikler wrote: >> >> > +(define-public blastem >> > + (package >> > + (name "blastem") >> > + (version "0.6.2 [...] Content analysis details: (2.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD 0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 49090 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.9 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Fri, Jun 18 2021, Leo Prikler wrote: > Am Freitag, den 18.06.2021, 20:39 +0200 schrieb Xinglu Chen: >> On Fri, Jun 18 2021, Leo Prikler wrote: >> >> > +(define-public blastem >> > + (package >> > + (name "blastem") >> > + (version "0.6.2 [...] Content analysis details: (2.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs [URI: yoctocell.xyz (xyz)] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD From abused NTLD 0.4 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to internal network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS 1.0 BULK_RE_SUSP_NTLD Precedence bulk and RE: from a suspicious TLD -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jun 18 2021, Leo Prikler wrote: > Am Freitag, den 18.06.2021, 20:39 +0200 schrieb Xinglu Chen: >> On Fri, Jun 18 2021, Leo Prikler wrote: >>=20 >> > +(define-public blastem >> > + (package >> > + (name "blastem") >> > + (version "0.6.2") >> > + (source (origin >> > + (method hg-fetch) >> > + (uri (hg-reference >> > + (url "https://www.retrodev.com/repos/blastem") >> > + (changeset (string-append "v" version)))) >> > + (file-name (string-append name "-" version "- >> > checkout")) >>=20 >> Nit: (guix hg-download) provides a =E2=80=98hg-file-name=E2=80=99 proced= ure, so you >> can just use (hg-file-name name version). > Good to know, I simply used the hg-reference... expansion from > etc/snippets, so that should probably be updated. Ah, I guess it time to update etc/snippets then :) >> > + (sha256 >> > + (base32 >> > + "08ycfisivh9rb9vmijlrpdryaw8spd81ck48960p15cnf8h25 >> > 35q")) >> > + (modules '((guix build utils))) >> > + (snippet >> > + '(begin >> > + ;; TODO: Separately package and unbundle nuklear >> > + (delete-file-recursively "zlib"))))) >>=20 >> Why is the zlib directory removed? Or perhaps, why do they bundle >> their own Zlib? > The have their own PNG implementation, which appears different from > libpng. So zlib exists as a dependency of that, but it's also > #included elsewhere. OK, thanks for the explanation. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJJBAEBCAAzFiEEAVhh4yyK5+SEykIzrPUJmaL7XHkFAmDNqwsVHHB1YmxpY0B5 b2N0b2NlbGwueHl6AAoJEKz1CZmi+1x5wEUQALKTMkXF4VEQ0Sf41zZXAoyv9pyn EgihD74ZFj8rn4ksJdrDWKLmlluUfi/zdB/ZmllVHFfWP/tS9MZwy/7jkT/ttON5 W3ayzX7ZdpLQPEdKf+qNRAzkfjvTcdoOvyEjtdacVC4WP1SArmiRGBeI3VoV1Dc1 i6QFhqLDvELT/qw+NV3/RBXBf0Qu0bnZCKMY8HcvATRLkaujIUQWCTHrbDLxfOnK xGt5WVSPOMR9DtkyumRunDNb9qOZw7KsceAWI9C14s294e+nEJYG5ysEPWs2a/de 5yI+cbSPygO/57WIpKmJGR5L1aMXYMw5PCJGR5bFMZorx/SSYtQ2lLM1jDDx+UWq G9AK7yDzS2ltCERrs9Ld7P5lPIMNVeKzXaNZWrxwehQfVVdGE3emU6pjOFgeUUfk bjmFyr/u6hYKjzwwoz6pJZUm+/W5B5efNEjDbc/kvRvAeJ+m3/eDlsdldkYuOHjb /HJEX/eVV9jhCK4b/fYhts37/HYkSoOdEXq6MJonqt3md8IGqdOIZZnSYKkFFPSa ZM/GKQdqA5Y46mYD79s8eny2ffNwhXa4p8k/aI4F5injl6H9G0AkknFNFVeXxMop RU1h1NGW5eIzHTUyG60fS5+uTQR5vlyyXGT9W3PIVlk2doAo2xJB6IluyQivUVgM MhqeBwBo6awn0q9e =eeNr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jun 26 16:48:44 2021 Received: (at 49090) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jun 2021 20:48:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48705 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lxFEK-0003vx-3Q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Jun 2021 16:48:44 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:49406) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lxFEI-0003vh-Bi for 49090@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Jun 2021 16:48:42 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:40684) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lxFEB-0001HD-63; Sat, 26 Jun 2021 16:48:35 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=42484 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lxFEA-0000u3-Uh; Sat, 26 Jun 2021 16:48:35 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: Leo Prikler Subject: Re: bug#49090: [PATCH] gnu: Add blastem. References: <20210618145926.6952-1-leo.prikler@student.tugraz.at> <87sg1f586a.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> <05ad84f8282a8046aa5ce81699806d835b7af908.camel@student.tugraz.at> Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2021 22:48:33 +0200 In-Reply-To: <05ad84f8282a8046aa5ce81699806d835b7af908.camel@student.tugraz.at> (Leo Prikler's message of "Fri, 18 Jun 2021 21:15:31 +0200") Message-ID: <8735t42vz2.fsf_-_@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 49090 Cc: 49090@debbugs.gnu.org, Xinglu Chen X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Hi Leo, Looks like this patch should be ready now? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Jun 27 05:28:25 2021 Received: (at 49090-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jun 2021 09:28:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48919 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lxR5V-0006Ue-3A for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jun 2021 05:28:25 -0400 Received: from mailrelay.tugraz.at ([129.27.2.202]:51681) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lxR5R-0006UT-1Y for 49090-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jun 2021 05:28:24 -0400 Received: from nijino.local (62-116-34-49.adsl.highway.telekom.at [62.116.34.49]) by mailrelay.tugraz.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4GCQQT6Czrz1LWnt; Sun, 27 Jun 2021 11:28:17 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mailrelay.tugraz.at 4GCQQT6Czrz1LWnt DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tugraz.at; s=mailrelay; t=1624786098; bh=9u3R5bz4RxoVSzStFJBWuFemOlH8AHJ11wE7FctYtUM=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=XvmJHY9XY3K+0k2Y6Rz7hLcHdYuTlP2145VgkyARo5WksKcQBVimsBJj/mG0tNDWq BlaHYjooXPJQ5q/ZyXXT9gb/cSo4uCaHwSNTPsiwkSwB8pPB3nJ0FG0JBF2hwEhRR6 wm3wN/EFpM5Udd/BMx3C7/veip0n0a08nF/CpqwY= Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#49090: [PATCH] gnu: Add blastem. From: Leo Prikler To: Ludovic =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2021 11:28:15 +0200 In-Reply-To: <8735t42vz2.fsf_-_@gnu.org> References: <20210618145926.6952-1-leo.prikler@student.tugraz.at> <87sg1f586a.fsf@yoctocell.xyz> <05ad84f8282a8046aa5ce81699806d835b7af908.camel@student.tugraz.at> <8735t42vz2.fsf_-_@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TUG-Backscatter-control: bt4lQm5Tva3SBgCuw0EnZw X-Spam-Scanner: SpamAssassin 3.003001 X-Spam-Score-relay: -1.9 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.74 on 129.27.10.116 X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 49090-done Cc: Xinglu Chen , 49090-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Am Samstag, den 26.06.2021, 22:48 +0200 schrieb Ludovic Courtès: > Hi Leo, > > Looks like this patch should be ready now? > > Thanks, > Ludo’. I would say so too. I've pushed it now. Thanks, Leo From unknown Fri Jun 20 07:13:29 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2021 11:24:08 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator