From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jun 17 15:43:57 2021 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Jun 2021 19:43:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55182 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ltxvg-0004Sv-04 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 15:43:57 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:49180) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ltvZJ-0006jd-BQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 13:12:43 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60448) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ltvZI-0004SP-E5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 13:12:40 -0400 Received: from mxout23.cac.washington.edu ([140.142.32.140]:36856) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ltvZF-0006yo-Aa for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 13:12:39 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f72.google.com (mail-wr1-f72.google.com [209.85.221.72]) by mxout23.cac.washington.edu (8.14.4+UW20.07/8.14.4+UW19.10) with ESMTP id 15HHAU2o031215 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 10:10:31 -0700 Received: by mail-wr1-f72.google.com with SMTP id k25-20020a5d52590000b0290114dee5b660so3218223wrc.16 for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 10:10:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=lSdpc8CJiANqIMp9kGx16IORJBLCAsQE8HRDdHzpILQ=; b=VjHxCkie7HboSFOk5x2ByJmCSmCdHRMOC+yKWwcGWBhA3p/oWl9JjHSKe2G93psclj ZLlCjqXZiwbAurKmRaFrh2vti1aQPQtbStyIDdEcBkDLKCYi2Uqu88+x1PEP5D35GcTZ tO4oSZvn8HR2t3iGN788f4JndcKRbeT43yDp6BYTCfUw8NFknfVQVNgU/2FIOKUP08VO U61rFVZ9PJF5gpQZ6MEQhuPwiwq6vsGZQmHR2UWc4dsIaB3xWje3azh1FpArPZrQq6cL oiv+kj3IYi1zeN4Ym8U2aSEcCaSQwYLIzjPm7vzPaH65FfzCjyIVdp3iq3KxJoQ7FDpc Z0AQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532h0Pk8IWYUim4au3wcFVzeuFNVIjT9B7hl5KmThxG8moM99hK8 yq5Q53I2P5MpHNHfyVRtgmEWUhCfpz/uWprTy+aNCWLnU0y6NsmDXEzpEHUsMXBLDBJ/05IEHxT w2UGP7x4QJmMyAUWQUAsBOuyjSub4/8U2pmHGOqCyczqcD8/UKCYtLYHC X-Received: by 2002:adf:c641:: with SMTP id u1mr7011024wrg.207.1623949829989; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 10:10:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy2Khwo1m1K6cRNrZNA9HGfoEKu731AhQzTpGy8xyoE4vC9a9ifmtA5jyUP6+0MnaaJXI9Qx9paE7WtKb0zPXY= X-Received: by 2002:adf:c641:: with SMTP id u1mr7010993wrg.207.1623949829675; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 10:10:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Spencer Nelson Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 10:10:19 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: 26.3; conf-mode for Java properties files uses incorrect comment syntax To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-PMX-Version: 6.4.9.2830568, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2021.6.17.165716, AntiVirus-Engine: 5.77.0, AntiVirus-Data: 2020.11.9.5770001 X-PMX-Server: mxout23.cac.washington.edu X-Sophos-SenderHistory: ip=209.85.221.72, fs=1583458, da=100399701, mc=13204, sc=3, hc=13201, sp=0, fso=93126908, re=52, sd=0, hd=30 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report= HTML_00_01 0.05, HTML_00_10 0.05, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_1000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_800_899 0, CT_TEXT_PLAIN_UTF8_CAPS 0, DATE_TZ_NA 0, DQ_S_H 0, FROM_EDU_TLD 0, KNOWN_MTA_TFX 0, NO_CTA_FOUND 0, NO_CTA_URI_FOUND 0, NO_URI_FOUND 0, NO_URI_HTTPS 0, SENDER_NO_AUTH 0, SPF_PASS 0, SXL_IP_TFX_WM 0, WEBMAIL_SOURCE 0, __BODY_NO_MAILTO 0, __CT 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __DATING_PHRASE 0, __DQ_IP_FSO_LARGE 0, __DQ_NEG_HEUR 0, __DQ_NEG_IP 0, __DQ_S_HIST_1 0, __DQ_S_IP_1MO 0, __DQ_S_IP_MC_100_P 0, __DQ_S_IP_MC_10_P 0, __DQ_S_IP_MC_1K_P 0, __DQ_S_IP_MC_1_P 0, __DQ_S_IP_MC_5_P 0, __DQ_S_IP_RE_99_L 0, __DQ_S_IP_SC_1_P 0, __DQ_S_IP_SP_0_P 0, __FROM_DOMAIN_NOT_IN_BODY 0, __FROM_NAME_NOT_IN_BODY 0, __FUR_RDNS_GMAIL 0, __HAS_FROM 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HELO_GMAIL 0, __INVOICE_MULTILINGUAL 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_TEXT_P 0, __MIME_TEXT_P1 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __MSGID_DOMAIN_NOT_IN_HDRS 0, __NO_HTML_TAG_RAW 0, __PHISH_SPEAR_STRUCTURE_1 0, __RDNS_WEBMAIL 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __SUBJ_ALPHA_END 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __TO_NO_NAME 0, __URI_NO_MAILTO 0, __X_GM_MESSAGE_STATE 0, __X_GOOGLE_DKIM_SIGNATURE 0, __X_GOOGLE_SMTP_SOURCE 0, __YOUTUBE_RCVD 0 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=140.142.32.140; envelope-from=swnelson@uw.edu; helo=mxout23.cac.washington.edu X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 15:43:54 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) I noticed today that conf-mode.el's derived mode, conf-javaprop-mode, isn't configured correctly for Java properties files. The documenting comment for conf-javaprop-mode says this: "Conf Mode starter for Java properties files. Comments start with `#' but are also recognized with `//' or between `/*' and `*/'. For details see `conf-mode'. Example: # Conf mode font-locks this right with \\[conf-javaprop-mode] (Java properties) // another kind of comment /* yet another */ But // and /* don't start comments in Java properties files. Java properties files just have single-line comments starting with #. Somewhat obscurely, comments can also start with !. I'm up for submitting a patch to fix this, but it would be my first contribution to emacs, and I'm a bit intimidated, so I want to check whether it's reasonable to fix first. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jun 19 09:33:30 2021 Received: (at 49077) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Jun 2021 13:33:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58817 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lub6I-0006xq-43 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Jun 2021 09:33:30 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:51684) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lub6G-0006xd-In for 49077@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Jun 2021 09:33:29 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=k+Dhd8//p91s03PmvWvZp/DGlrQeggAaKCtvK3+xXxs=; b=p5v1H2HcdnF5xCFYacs97thkH7 siLSU/daDmNiqxw6yHd4mqEsgzOyLtEIOHE1pFtn4/zEa8eRyEKCnent+QG+npXrhjUEsvdXIyDbQ nAmwlB0xwG1zKzFS7nlaq10dUlkadshyR+W2sohI7CeYwT8F6+yl5HxY/T3v4cKq8MDg=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lub65-000332-8b; Sat, 19 Jun 2021 15:33:19 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Spencer Nelson Subject: Re: bug#49077: 26.3; conf-mode for Java properties files uses incorrect comment syntax References: X-Now-Playing: Oh Sees's _Face Stabber_: "Henchlock" Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2021 15:33:16 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Spencer Nelson's message of "Thu, 17 Jun 2021 10:10:19 -0700") Message-ID: <8735tex9lv.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Spencer Nelson writes: > I'm up for submitting a patch to fix this, but it would be my first > contribution to emacs, and I'm a bit intimidated, so I want to check > whether it's reasonable to fix first. Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 49077 Cc: 49077@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) Spencer Nelson writes: > I'm up for submitting a patch to fix this, but it would be my first > contribution to emacs, and I'm a bit intimidated, so I want to check > whether it's reasonable to fix first. Sure, fixing this would be very welcome. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jul 16 08:15:35 2022 Received: (at 49077) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jul 2022 12:15:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43135 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oCghq-0000vR-NI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jul 2022 08:15:34 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:57048) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oCgho-0000v0-GH for 49077@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jul 2022 08:15:33 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References: In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=H+c+1fwxefxuD/BBYniscmBcUfHZ7K7MPBOKIe6TggA=; b=ESxXrY9Uo6pUBEPkFuq3MzKkZc b/0nYDmClDbvRw9EWk6srsWbLDhgiHjPv/laewehRPQlhbTfApWeTo6e7g6afN2lgpy3d9FhsLNRo MNBe20KqGgFeNDyrkdoDYV/1D1GHMIxt5NuVU/O1hkwTfX4wKcrOhe8uV/NnisLPVxD4=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=joga) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oCghe-0001uG-Ho; Sat, 16 Jul 2022 14:15:25 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Spencer Nelson Subject: Re: bug#49077: 26.3; conf-mode for Java properties files uses incorrect comment syntax In-Reply-To: (Spencer Nelson's message of "Thu, 17 Jun 2021 10:10:19 -0700") References: X-Now-Playing: Xeno & Oaklander's _Vi-deo_: "Television" Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2022 14:15:21 +0200 Message-ID: <87wncdqmna.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Spencer Nelson writes: > The documenting comment for conf-javaprop-mode says this: > > "Conf Mode starter for Java properties files. > Comments start with `#' but are also recognized with `//' or > between `/*' and `*/'. > [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 49077 Cc: 49077@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Spencer Nelson writes: > The documenting comment for conf-javaprop-mode says this: > > "Conf Mode starter for Java properties files. > Comments start with `#' but are also recognized with `//' or > between `/*' and `*/'. > For details see `conf-mode'. Example: > > # Conf mode font-locks this right with \\[conf-javaprop-mode] (Java properties) > // another kind of comment > /* yet another */ > > But // and /* don't start comments in Java properties files. Java > properties files just have single-line comments starting with #. > Somewhat obscurely, comments can also start with !. I thought this should be easy to fix, but I'm not at all sure where the font-locking of // and /* */ is coming from. I feel like I've looked at all the font-lock-* variables, but I can't find anything. Anybody? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jul 16 08:15:36 2022 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jul 2022 12:15:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43138 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oCghs-0000ve-1Z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jul 2022 08:15:36 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:57062) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oCghr-0000vE-7d for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jul 2022 08:15:35 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=mSiwuvUxJctthI+OYvPAKUpdZ3mRrOGZ2j7zzX9LRH4=; b=bpXpE//qIVl81UhK1NU4T5TylE vH4qferiemW0zbbzm4qfQPxy4EBZaBgEeu1jyI3kw1k4J/+viXWnScVoPQg1682W7eeDFR08cctR1 Fgl/t1O4+qJuQVXR05TGtRZYmCQPoDNWliuleiFrDYqeK+C2VSZh+nwwP9C1cVLoy7xI=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=joga) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oCghj-0001uP-6x for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jul 2022 14:15:29 +0200 Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2022 14:15:26 +0200 Message-Id: <87v8rxqmn5.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #49077 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 49077 + moreinfo quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) tags 49077 + moreinfo quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Aug 20 05:55:06 2022 Received: (at 49077) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Aug 2022 09:55:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59617 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oPLC6-0004M6-7e for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Aug 2022 05:55:06 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:47904) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oPLC2-0004LU-Oq for 49077@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Aug 2022 05:55:05 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References: In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=f8l+TVSV6Hz0yqRUmeq4LjXKttGw7UhT4n9+RaJvJVo=; b=VNFB9aHHENXBsfiRR7SJl+5Bfm p5bEhp2KRl31UWSad8BW+zLdnGCHOvpfPKP24wLw/qFcD/1p/rFQFaxhGws5t6Es/IWTaHr2qFZOJ J3RSC8JC/gPYz428pTj26lgtkmnz5DnGVt/G69ScuO4OHpvnJr2ywVMFWhwn4DQdP464=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=joga) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oPLBt-0003XN-IB; Sat, 20 Aug 2022 11:54:55 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Spencer Nelson Subject: Re: bug#49077: 26.3; conf-mode for Java properties files uses incorrect comment syntax In-Reply-To: <87wncdqmna.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sat, 16 Jul 2022 14:15:21 +0200") References: <87wncdqmna.fsf@gnus.org> X-Now-Playing: Various's _Deathbomb Digital Singles Club Year 2_: "Creeping of the Foul" Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2022 11:54:53 +0200 Message-ID: <87r11bp7de.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > I thought this should be easy to fix, but I'm not at all sure where the > font-locking of // and /* */ is coming from. I feel like I've looked at > all the font-lock-* variables, but I can't find an [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 49077 Cc: 49077@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > I thought this should be easy to fix, but I'm not at all sure where the > font-locking of // and /* */ is coming from. I feel like I've looked at > all the font-lock-* variables, but I can't find anything. It was in the syntax property stuff. Now fixed in Emacs 29. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Aug 20 05:55:10 2022 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Aug 2022 09:55:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59620 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oPLCA-0004ML-HJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Aug 2022 05:55:10 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:47918) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oPLC6-0004Li-Ha for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Aug 2022 05:55:06 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=9o3hmbqQ/WINywbyUfvSRkbTQC4synBiT5hTb9XzYh0=; b=S0DiwDujRSXZhWaL8iIqnDD38I /5SB8k1Or182akZx+q5Ol809colSVV0RKbwCgp7VVTNyOg5NtHmbYsl9qctCAscxPgv+YIm6wcDQz PFOjDOsHRCTGYNZbQZ0l9ZQU+ZATo2TSE0JfyiF3aAEleelP5BvB6fA4xndgbakGhp4U=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=joga) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oPLBy-0003XU-JM for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Aug 2022 11:55:00 +0200 Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2022 11:54:58 +0200 Message-Id: <87pmgvp7d9.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #49077 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 49077 29.1 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) close 49077 29.1 quit From unknown Thu Jun 19 14:05:50 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2022 11:24:07 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator