From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jun 17 10:53:13 2021 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Jun 2021 14:53:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54997 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lttOK-00034W-If for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 10:53:12 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:60100) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lttOH-00034K-Kt for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 10:53:11 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55624) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lttOH-0001Zc-5R for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 10:53:09 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-x535.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::535]:38548) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lttOE-0005W0-Ps for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 10:53:08 -0400 Received: by mail-ed1-x535.google.com with SMTP id t7so4399589edd.5 for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 07:53:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=message-id:subject:from:to:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=C6/CuAilbDycstBteogI4TXEKUZA/+BAdGebNzmWFXs=; b=SfdiX+o/9Ir1nAW06Rs+82bwORusKQwqQLnkNuaUWAlA9h2bETHKEJT+RQbNFVY6ky wr5p6eLVsZIo6cAPo3O+FvC6L+UOWDaGDmVlWZRnauT+KjxYYFIglKfLz2MoitWOovFt CLYGXM0jRYqzinqKLdb5UBAsch+lCM4W/rwoYXGgM+jhrRYdA2fE8iAbfWkWR90AudKz D8feiW8rzNJZ6yR5NlvasMOhOu1+BXQjWlW6v5QcdKNqY82Kb1D2asG5tQ3YsbEKN2mV 8qbgMRWow66DtwcVVPN5MBteaxufpDsJc52HyB8ZzcX79Z7DEpcAZDboZ2rryOfpHhyO HYkA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:date:user-agent :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=C6/CuAilbDycstBteogI4TXEKUZA/+BAdGebNzmWFXs=; b=BfZbrNFqKeFEaN3qCMkQjY+QkQSuNWFue1YP7JKiQmP5Jsf98lw4G1ks/6cSI9fc1t 26ZKwYG+UFHtHWWPmc9W4dp3izVtCkQJY4Szq3swEButM2JQul1g4j064xXqFAmCDCmw KpPEykvu+UO8FVFndCRIod6eTNEvfaCrSQs1YHXtbrVNfO6ptjm0lw3dfebC4cOFjCi6 /5ITeiI78t3gMgAF032zZxSDQeqPOyAA62OQacgl3jClX0jnXRDLHFipJgPqZhSE9YyB v16Sse3Qez7ybItkWrQ7JGVlWvfXNycz9O4vXc8Gii+hMX+lpoKOfpFxIzBhIkJeBu2i kG8w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533fyH40dfb7uo0Wgobsoxg5gxcSy3yxlnHen6Kd+/K7QpJFObzI x7C2QsdhtVD6KJ8C0BfHl55BjUVGdNHInA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwwC2HtW25qHYl8bGASc16cHwjW6M7mGfMhZGELfuXwj9uI4wjVP7ew2jYxBjiTX6DgShkNZA== X-Received: by 2002:a50:8e57:: with SMTP id 23mr7135447edx.354.1623941583491; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 07:53:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2a02:a45d:af56:1:a2f7:7b85:b4b4:d061? (2a02-a45d-af56-1-a2f7-7b85-b4b4-d061.fixed6.kpn.net. [2a02:a45d:af56:1:a2f7:7b85:b4b4:d061]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id df20sm3976850edb.76.2021.06.17.07.53.02 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 17 Jun 2021 07:53:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1aed416d4a4c84b688a893c1832a7ae076f10ffb.camel@gmail.com> Subject: 28.0.50; python-send-to-repl functions misbehave From: dalanicolai@gmail.com To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 16:53:02 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.40.2 (3.40.2-1.fc34) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::535; envelope-from=dalanicolai@gmail.com; helo=mail-ed1-x535.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) This is a combined bug report for two unrelated but still somewhat related bugs. - The first bug is that when using `python-send-to-repl` functions, the   input does not get printed in the REPL buffer. - The second bug is that for various setups, even the output does not   get printed properly. The reason for this bug report, which might arguably have the best description, is the Spacemacs issue at https://github.com/syl20bnr/spacemacs/issues/14845. Start emacs with -Q flag. Open a python buffer/.py file. Call `M-x run-python` type e.g. 2+2 now send to REPL with `M-x python-shell-send-buffer/statement` The input does not get printed in the REPL (as I would expect from sending to REPL).  This could be intentionally, but I would say that at least `python-shell-send-statement` should print also the input. Then secondly, often, even the output does not get printed (when not sending an explicit print statement). This seems to occur when sending more then two lines (e.g. when using `python-shell-send-buffer` in a buffer that starts with an empty line and has 2+2 on the second line). So then the 'interactivity` of using the repl got totally lost.This is a combined bug report for two unrelated but still somewhat related bugs. - The first bug is that when using `python-send-to-repl` functions, the input   does not get printed in the REPL buffer. - The second bug is that for various   setups, even the output does not get printed properly. The reason for this bug report is the Spacemacs issue at https://github.com/syl20bnr/spacemacs/issues/14845. To reproduce: - Start emacs with -Q flag. - Open a python buffer/.py file. - Call `M-x run-python` - type e.g. 2+2 and send to REPL with `M-x python-shell-send- buffer/statement` The INPUT does not get printed in the REPL (as I would expect from sending to REPL). This could be intentionally, but I would say that at least `python-shell-send-statement` should print also the input. Then secondly, often, even the output does not get printed (when not sending an explicit print statement). This seems to occur when sending more then two lines (e.g. when using `python-shell-send-buffer` in a buffer that starts with an empty line and has 2+2 on the second line). So then the 'interactivity` of using the REPL got totally lost. In GNU Emacs 28.0.50 (build 1, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.24.25, cairo version 1.16.0)  of 2021-02-18 built on daniel-fedora Repository revision: 185121da6978553d538d37d6d0e67dc52e13311f Repository branch: feature/native-comp Windowing system distributor 'The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.12011000 System Description: Fedora 34 (Workstation Edition) Configured using:  'configure --with-nativecomp' Configured features: CAIRO DBUS FREETYPE GIF GLIB GMP GNUTLS GPM GSETTINGS HARFBUZZ JPEG JSON LCMS2 LIBOTF LIBSELINUX LIBSYSTEMD LIBXML2 M17N_FLT MODULES NATIVE_COMP NOTIFY INOTIFY PDUMPER PNG RSVG SOUND THREADS TIFF TOOLKIT_SCROLL_BARS X11 XDBE XIM XPM GTK3 ZLIB Important settings:   value of $LANG: en_US.UTF-8   value of $XMODIFIERS: @im=none   locale-coding-system: utf-8-unix Major mode: Lisp Interaction Minor modes in effect:   shell-dirtrack-mode: t   tooltip-mode: t   global-eldoc-mode: t   eldoc-mode: t   electric-indent-mode: t   mouse-wheel-mode: t   tool-bar-mode: t   menu-bar-mode: t   file-name-shadow-mode: t   global-font-lock-mode: t   font-lock-mode: t   blink-cursor-mode: t   auto-composition-mode: t   auto-encryption-mode: t   auto-compression-mode: t   line-number-mode: t   transient-mark-mode: t Load-path shadows: None found. Features: (thingatpt compile cl-extra python tramp-sh tramp tramp-loaddefs trampver tramp-integration files-x tramp-compat shell pcomplete parse-time iso8601 ls-lisp format-spec comint ring ansi-color help-mode pp shadow sort mail-extr emacsbug message rmc puny dired dired-loaddefs rfc822 mml easymenu mml-sec epa derived epg epg-config gnus-util rmail rmail-loaddefs auth-source cl-seq eieio eieio-core eieio-loaddefs password-cache json map cl-macs text-property-search time-date subr-x seq byte-opt gv bytecomp byte-compile cconv mm-decode mm-bodies mm-encode mail-parse rfc2231 mailabbrev gmm-utils mailheader cl- loaddefs cl-lib sendmail rfc2047 rfc2045 ietf-drums mm-util mail-prsvr mail- utils iso-transl tooltip eldoc electric uniquify ediff-hook vc-hooks lisp-float-type mwheel term/x-win x-win term/common-win x-dnd tool-bar dnd fontset image regexp-opt fringe tabulated-list replace newcomment text-mode elisp-mode lisp-mode prog-mode register page tab-bar menu-bar rfn-eshadow isearch timer select scroll-bar mouse jit-lock font-lock syntax facemenu font-core term/tty-colors frame minibuffer cl-generic cham georgian utf-8-lang misc-lang vietnamese tibetan thai tai-viet lao korean japanese eucjp-ms cp51932 hebrew greek romanian slovak czech european ethiopic indian cyrillic chinese composite charscript charprop case-table epa-hook jka-cmpr-hook help simple abbrev obarray cl-preloaded nadvice button loaddefs faces cus-face pcase macroexp files window text-properties overlay sha1 md5 base64 format env code-pages mule custom widget hashtable-print-readable backquote threads dbusbind inotify lcms2 dynamic-setting system-font-setting font-render-setting cairo move-toolbar gtk x-toolkit x multi-tty make-network-process nativecomp emacs) Memory information: ((conses 16 100433 12328)  (symbols 48 9063 1)  (strings 32 27932 1704)  (string-bytes 1 968685)  (vectors 16 16800)  (vector-slots 8 337783 21001)  (floats 8 47 279)  (intervals 56 252 0)  (buffers 992 14)) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Aug 28 05:43:15 2021 Received: (at 49073) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Aug 2021 09:43:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53414 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mJurq-0001EN-Th for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 05:43:15 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-f48.google.com ([209.85.208.48]:34699) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mJurl-0001E4-Vs for 49073@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 05:43:13 -0400 Received: by mail-ed1-f48.google.com with SMTP id i6so13688568edu.1 for <49073@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 02:43:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KT7VHH3Tqk613MExLo+z/FAuhtY+lvYEFVr90bq+hPo=; b=ue5Sgpyw4Ylbx0jFLGje8G4glwRfjZAI1ovcRqGXI8SJvOFH7+VktFK5x/h18aSHjr 6FKfsOdjcslLus56MuHAuPZklb2jsvZnJmMCYJBOJush3PnduFJ4uIYbPpxKvNNTy/tb 8ZhM0MA+GBLmCbzGfw6cNqmaL8GFNTqbvHGXnryBjY2JgwYrod7WC0HPzUix/BFIleku K22eAaErYqdE+LV8wFQkUqRJNGSrcOs1PTxbeAPPueAVu0yHfjG+w6iGtObzK8+L+1CU M5pXN9nt04t8yslEFia0UfxKGKM4cXZbg7SyVXjdS7REvD6DOs+YlAn9WmhHlgbPRGlc Cvbg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KT7VHH3Tqk613MExLo+z/FAuhtY+lvYEFVr90bq+hPo=; b=mDYkoVr0o4zjfg07H3rkKfaf8Aktl0CiZjK+WyYTMB2gMnxuBjynB6U9t0LlMEN4Ae bnLZYbvmBbLtPZbD7yhIm4FP/9AxtJVTVq2ZAvfB21uM4B2ntPTO9w3olQvW5xkru8H6 RcqRWpnnPqXsfVVNgmhaLbk76wqN0IAP+ueS3MLdHEbhMdXH8D0EAi9q4copGbfFmzmt lfjyzT0tNMMHRyVuZG0yPAb5TNrwww31hwLqilG91WtXh2ugrEYOGVrHKvr45Y468JPl obdFbI4ClruB/AYKRoBXIMc3gaER5EEYmWoaTF1yV7dwol38jAXrenWr52VqXLi3LLvr BPrw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533cDIUpLWmtjBFo/TtJveiGYWp9N5WkoKIM1fKpiPIQFs+beYPV Xt4SM+y5oJXKYxb996Hsj6wL2Ds7oVw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy0WchWA6Fn3+SiCx4LOxcbVIPTHJbOMHejzLugW9izNNKBYw37WuaUv97J5yqztknrS/SBxA== X-Received: by 2002:a50:f0da:: with SMTP id a26mr13940597edm.58.1630143783899; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 02:43:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ars3 ([2a02:8109:8ac0:56d0::ae3f]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y10sm4537401eda.47.2021.08.28.02.43.03 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 28 Aug 2021 02:43:03 -0700 (PDT) From: Augusto Stoffel To: dalanicolai@gmail.com Subject: Re: bug#49073: 28.0.50; python-send-to-repl functions misbehave References: <1aed416d4a4c84b688a893c1832a7ae076f10ffb.camel@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2021 11:43:02 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1aed416d4a4c84b688a893c1832a7ae076f10ffb.camel@gmail.com> (dalanicolai@gmail.com's message of "Thu, 17 Jun 2021 16:53:02 +0200") Message-ID: <87o89hewgp.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 49073 Cc: 49073@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On Thu, 17 Jun 2021 at 16:53, dalanicolai@gmail.com wrote: > This is a combined bug report for two unrelated but still somewhat > related bugs. > > - The first bug is that when using `python-send-to-repl` functions, the > =C2=A0 input does not get printed in the REPL buffer. > - The second bug is that for various setups, even the output does not > =C2=A0 get printed properly. > See the patch in https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D49822#45 for a proposed solution to the second problem. As to the first problem (not echoing the input): I think this would be pretty hard to implement in a dumb terminal. You could try running the Python shell in a terminal emulator (term or vterm) and write a macro to paste regions of text into it. In any case, echoing the input also seems to be a somewhat unconventional behavior. I don't think I would want that. PS: By 'python-send-to-repl' I assume you mean the 'python-shell-send-*' family of commands, or do you refer to some external package? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Aug 28 08:57:03 2021 Received: (at 49073) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Aug 2021 12:57:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53538 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mJxtL-0008K5-87 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 08:57:03 -0400 Received: from mail-vk1-f180.google.com ([209.85.221.180]:38503) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mJxtG-0008Jk-CL for 49073@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 08:56:58 -0400 Received: by mail-vk1-f180.google.com with SMTP id k124so2806767vke.5 for <49073@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 05:56:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=x7qlxfs15AOdwZ6UNebD8a8v4Psx+tc1UTuhI6N+2fI=; b=SXVAHt01vGzEnkn2VqmRSZSZFGgS8MQEtM441vzOa/Kl4ApZyhH+z0S0C4zvEXafm/ KDxnlEuJ8ijZA5dhj6in2BbD2vjronQeAK5tlH5wIo2lt7zwc/bmOnC2B3HX/kEgxVOO iDumJRmUl1WMcdSBiB/+ZB9zxFbtaAK4WRbbslM6C13Knx0d5N6uDqWY1393F7JbTqyO 0ksYH1NechvTCmpvnOiovH0FlPZC5I1eJQlx4/DMYosAf/GWQABWq+rJ7V2rMeUGLqFa i21yLwKcLFnSIDl2r788ZNQhiqnf4wyobQlOYQO7Fyqnr3aAOlvxLdUrNVF7pyz3sg0k AJ2Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=x7qlxfs15AOdwZ6UNebD8a8v4Psx+tc1UTuhI6N+2fI=; b=clz5MjMV74KZ6OLifsk2OsjcmKKiilb+6OP1pder0dJ3U4i9w3WxTfiTo//ZKMuC2Z NPSv8DUz8etu5QsAQ65NqJ+hUH5aDMfTyrT1XW/puJTuUIjn7y8VpmijpCHydRKY1AKa oormYUu/Xc+DJctTPfF6uTADFma3CQeSkCABfqgmjblLLbRnaKeOUNHomdfSM/bA/CqK n+JCc3bunbxCJKTCxXw4V+rA/K+ucHtHTWMI72L/jpR00UJRxKAmYwJuWuC3w9ysB53K hZgs++iZDHuuQn/08Jdvb7Hneceh27ctyfaCWzLLrURqIFnS78CKjpb958zXP7H9Zuha 4HAg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532ZzELqmBQ1o0gDy94Ov8o4mTkWachNRP2SmKCo/V+CeWr+oXWv rdVuoVGSsTijLnQtC4rYxA4PKWXsmoJv6xOz3B8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwbhRh0BDlAo7uOFS10ymB/759peexDNAkOvVzDQsPC2FA067LFuOktFkfjunhJ0pyyiSKU8xWYM9urMj84a8U= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:308d:: with SMTP id w135mr9814709vkw.15.1630155408521; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 05:56:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1aed416d4a4c84b688a893c1832a7ae076f10ffb.camel@gmail.com> <87o89hewgp.fsf@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <87o89hewgp.fsf@gmail.com> From: dalanicolai Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2021 14:56:35 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#49073: 28.0.50; python-send-to-repl functions misbehave To: Augusto Stoffel Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000dbe3805ca9e22fa" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 49073 Cc: 49073@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) --0000000000000dbe3805ca9e22fa Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Thanks for the update! Unfortunately, I actually rarely code in python. It was just when I did for a moment, then I noticed this surprising behavior of the 'python-send-repl' functions (which turned out to be partly a Spacemacs issue, and partly fixed already through the extra flag for (not) sending the coding cookie). About the first 'bug' (showing the input), I was considering the ipython shell where one can refer to previous input by its number. But I agree that for send-to-repl functions printing the input is not a very useful addition. Looking at the description of the patch, the new behavior looks preferable to me as it is generally nice to see some values when sending statements/code during interactive development. On Sat, 28 Aug 2021 at 11:43, Augusto Stoffel wrote: > On Thu, 17 Jun 2021 at 16:53, dalanicolai@gmail.com wrote: > > > This is a combined bug report for two unrelated but still somewhat > > related bugs. > > > > - The first bug is that when using `python-send-to-repl` functions, the > > input does not get printed in the REPL buffer. > > - The second bug is that for various setups, even the output does not > > get printed properly. > > > > See the patch in https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=49822#45 > for a proposed solution to the second problem. > > As to the first problem (not echoing the input): I think this would be > pretty hard to implement in a dumb terminal. You could try running the > Python shell in a terminal emulator (term or vterm) and write a macro to > paste regions of text into it. In any case, echoing the input also > seems to be a somewhat unconventional behavior. I don't think I would > want that. > > PS: By 'python-send-to-repl' I assume you mean the 'python-shell-send-*' > family of commands, or do you refer to some external package? > --0000000000000dbe3805ca9e22fa Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks for the update! Unfortunately, I actually rarely co= de in python. It was
just when I did for a moment, then I noticed this s= urprising behavior of the
'python-send-repl' functions (which tu= rned out to be partly a Spacemacs issue,
and partly fixed already throug= h the extra flag for (not) sending the coding
cookie).

About the = first 'bug' (showing the input), I was considering the ipython shel= l
where one can refer to previous input by its number. But I agree that = for
send-to-repl functions printing the input is not a very useful addit= ion.

Looking at the description of the patch, the new behavior looks= preferable to me
as it is generally nice to see some values when sendin= g statements/code during
interactive development.


On S= at, 28 Aug 2021 at 11:43, Augusto Stoffel <arstoffel@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2021 at 16:53, dalanicolai@gmail.com wrote:=

> This is a combined bug report for two unrelated but still somewhat
> related bugs.
>
> - The first bug is that when using `python-send-to-repl` functions, th= e
> =C2=A0 input does not get printed in the REPL buffer.
> - The second bug is that for various setups, even the output does not<= br> > =C2=A0 get printed properly.
>

See the patch in https://debbugs.gnu.org/c= gi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D49822#45
for a proposed solution to the second problem.

As to the first problem (not echoing the input): I think this would be
pretty hard to implement in a dumb terminal.=C2=A0 You could try running th= e
Python shell in a terminal emulator (term or vterm) and write a macro to paste regions of text into it.=C2=A0 In any case, echoing the input also seems to be a somewhat unconventional behavior.=C2=A0 I don't think I w= ould
want that.

PS: By 'python-send-to-repl' I assume you mean the 'python-shel= l-send-*'
family of commands, or do you refer to some external package?
--0000000000000dbe3805ca9e22fa-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Feb 25 18:23:50 2022 Received: (at 49073) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Feb 2022 23:23:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53912 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nNjwD-0005At-Q7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Feb 2022 18:23:49 -0500 Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:60001) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nNjwC-0005Ad-39 for 49073@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 25 Feb 2022 18:23:49 -0500 Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC2ED5C006B; Fri, 25 Feb 2022 18:23:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 25 Feb 2022 18:23:42 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sturm.com.au; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; bh=4uqKJGv9JaJaK5 vYMD45p6jxCvUAucGKJ9si/zZNeHc=; b=NGKwVrZJPwjjqNLqSgUq1Z2p6K8tA/ o4dqADc9lQtIEj8Ct+KKiFWJX2RX1K7zCA/t6pWFNjrqSvNlU6RPTE6OEw2lOr1d 1W4h6cO8sYoWpZntxzr2MA/Yc/7dOPDPuYoWtZIJP7Z2N4Q2z4zUhF+1iT3q91LJ tVlrxmTDO3iGUGYoAnB6NSfjU+c7Xf8gsy9413U8rNlvCHphFXTKec9Yd/WDSKNj AKpQr1/ZXuBmUG5kp22MTRTPm6JUHrZRH/ZyyULtuivRCufAPOgA5+WQMfTiYqkm FzaRj2ltZE4qCFgIYLcJE+V+D7WJREkF0ay6RxgzRPpkNwSk5zqceXgQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=4uqKJGv9JaJaK5vYMD45p6jxCvUAucGKJ9si/zZNe Hc=; b=ee8RYuPhbRDl/rW4k9U7Ipvw2k6XuWlE752kHw0oDxkY60rkXY+CMe2ZQ jrVfy8YRpDMp8t80qqPNumT2ZSx1v/ZeVoi1C7XC5zmKjpw3UpHopmgdgeLdaY3d 2Sb3cTmOL4GvnCS94lKfqtQJr3kKnlle7fmyeEAPQgRocGGyrMsqEPpyd8AHW1hi 3Qz3hxidE2aP4LasoEPQTIiLhXGEwK2CdwICvlDBKNZVrFZrE+9Es6d/SKdusQUi zevkaH0gBt3eaJPlud/K+gsN8e0iwies+BybwHfoSGZZPsprzpzOE8p+56TQg/lz HpDls6hebFOY/puSH5QxevFBbjAag== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvvddrleehgddtjecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhephffvufhfffgjkfgfgggtgfesthhqre dttderjeenucfhrhhomhepuegvnhcuufhtuhhrmhhfvghlshcuoegsvghnsehsthhurhhm rdgtohhmrdgruheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepffegveeukeejvefhhefhledvgfehhe eltdeifeeukeeiieevieeutefhueeiffejnecuffhomhgrihhnpehgnhhurdhorhhgnecu vehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepsggvnhessh htuhhrmhdrtghomhdrrghu X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri, 25 Feb 2022 18:23:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from Marseille (localhost.lan [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 6148094e; Fri, 25 Feb 2022 23:23:38 +0000 (UTC) From: Ben Sturmfels To: dalanicolai@gmail.com Subject: Re: bug#49073: 28.0.50; python-send-to-repl functions misbehave References: <1aed416d4a4c84b688a893c1832a7ae076f10ffb.camel@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2022 10:23:38 +1100 In-Reply-To: <1aed416d4a4c84b688a893c1832a7ae076f10ffb.camel@gmail.com> (dalanicolai@gmail.com's message of "Thu, 17 Jun 2021 16:53:02 +0200") Message-ID: <87h78mfs3p.fsf@sturm.com.au> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 49073 Cc: 49073@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Thu, 17 Jun 2021, dalanicolai@gmail.com wrote: > This is a combined bug report for two unrelated but still somewhat > related bugs. > > - The first bug is that when using `python-send-to-repl` functions, the > =C2=A0 input does not get printed in the REPL buffer. This seems similar to bug#29592: 25.3; python does not print input or output in the inferior process. https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D29592 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Feb 26 11:24:19 2022 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Feb 2022 16:24:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56216 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nNzrm-0001Iq-UF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2022 11:24:19 -0500 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:44232) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nNzrl-0001Ii-3A for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2022 11:24:17 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:52894) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nNzrk-0001Bg-UY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2022 11:24:16 -0500 Received: from [2a00:1450:4864:20::62e] (port=37422 helo=mail-ej1-x62e.google.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nNzri-0003bl-Ez for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2022 11:24:16 -0500 Received: by mail-ej1-x62e.google.com with SMTP id bg10so16680093ejb.4 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2022 08:24:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=dx+hvS7m8x7yDVLZBE/nxuejKY0oulyLjLD96/DXSLE=; b=kPXowgvryLjSPc+zstnNfW9K7sSExSbHiV/si7LZHcpt4fbeb1myTXurdUKjVGRrx+ Xsq1SGqSusWmMxB202b9oEnJ2SRHtnP+i+9+73qLJAUdS8qwIj8uIqTp7MzYkGJgxne5 pY1DjLwtT2x255DIeGpHS6efKE0Y2aggEMlkJhTyRFrY8e5+0gYoDJ5xtpNQFjFHedC1 opyjoXnl7PI0maIhwWNecTz99NAMFO1KPiLdL6ErlHx8X95/lM5O9XREAh0L8xSm6GvE th4r+12CFi7Y/QH18eDeckCHkTTW0i5/bEYeJEcr24Oz1t5aDx2tL3ayYuJR0AvG+9Ih vDYg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=dx+hvS7m8x7yDVLZBE/nxuejKY0oulyLjLD96/DXSLE=; b=6wB+6JesIzenPN5El2XYeomYnY+Jr72BQHRI4BkhmZeaw50Wu1qhpEg4t4SydN+wOZ 9a3cRkYSIWWekczKpKHRMZSrsH+Z/nlfZw1Z1aMHsV8021/7Ok3Kb3FNq3ioHfCQhVVF q8qv4gcGoFHGQBNi88ZXTyLRxAWATWjOSxKAH6sdyALRdMHFG4fL3bCRdqwpREh6c5aU zoBuIWo3vBZEpdqe/Lci7ZDyT6BCi2ggGKK36ILXZ7WIRuVoUgvYOiB28due8xaSPorO /pUJaFyd5bg1Xb8Mwd0f75wU/p7AaYb1HnOjultGfebLhBwufp8CfZmUWfcXHi9IkmaE I0jg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5339qATL3RwT4t4HYJbGn2jYKbpXtfpJLwOE5XnW3WwGSAMMlZ5p whJ903B5/Hiwpdozi7uZrb6P8EmuRvNM6A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxdpcGy1RuTtKW6/9V1k1hIt2wyMRpoX9eQuEwdnogzVBHZoZ6ME4MNuauZ8B7OHqvkziuB4g== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:65d5:b0:6ba:3133:dfb9 with SMTP id z21-20020a17090665d500b006ba3133dfb9mr10275076ejn.56.1645892653039; Sat, 26 Feb 2022 08:24:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from ars3 ([2a02:8109:8ac0:56d0::758e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b16-20020a170906195000b006cf3810dc99sm2348580eje.208.2022.02.26.08.24.12 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 26 Feb 2022 08:24:12 -0800 (PST) From: Augusto Stoffel To: Ben Sturmfels via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Subject: Re: bug#49073: 28.0.50; python-send-to-repl functions misbehave References: <1aed416d4a4c84b688a893c1832a7ae076f10ffb.camel@gmail.com> <87h78mfs3p.fsf@sturm.com.au> Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2022 17:24:11 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87h78mfs3p.fsf@sturm.com.au> (Ben Sturmfels via's message of "Sat, 26 Feb 2022 10:23:38 +1100") Message-ID: <87ilt1iok4.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 2a00:1450:4864:20::62e (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::62e; envelope-from=arstoffel@gmail.com; helo=mail-ej1-x62e.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (-0.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, PDS_HP_HELO_NORDNS=0.659, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit Cc: 49073@debbugs.gnu.org, dalanicolai@gmail.com, Ben Sturmfels X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) On Sat, 26 Feb 2022 at 10:23, Ben Sturmfels via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,= the Swiss army knife of text editors" wrote: > On Thu, 17 Jun 2021, dalanicolai@gmail.com wrote: > >> This is a combined bug report for two unrelated but still somewhat >> related bugs. >> >> - The first bug is that when using `python-send-to-repl` functions, the >> =C2=A0 input does not get printed in the REPL buffer. This is by design. It's not too hard to copy the evaluated code to the comint buffer, and I toyed a bit with it, eventually concluding that it's not all that great of a feature. As to the second point mentioned in the original message of this bug (=E2=80=9Cfor various setups, even the output does not get printed properly= =E2=80=9D), I can't observe this, so a minimal recipe to reproduce would be appreciated. > > This seems similar to bug#29592: 25.3; python does not print input or > output in the inferior process. > > https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D29592 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Feb 27 18:07:38 2022 Received: (at 49073) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Feb 2022 23:07:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59544 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nOSde-0004cX-Jb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Feb 2022 18:07:38 -0500 Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.20]:57353) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nOSdd-0004cG-0j for 49073@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Feb 2022 18:07:38 -0500 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 290FA3200A3E; Sun, 27 Feb 2022 18:07:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 27 Feb 2022 18:07:31 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sturm.com.au; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; bh=/NF8x8VcIlH/gS Mn7upSldrSBKEteM6M0u7HlLN88ms=; b=eZpV8sMZ0Cwg2BqtkWTm5H7kdOekLP yNcYo5wFUMfvU72u6I3R0UllquLr17qLGcp/4jgJZHmAbmLLpBPS6S3GZRRh4s8+ NhrxewyJMXdtV70QBxGH/qLk27IsWoweq9gSwQVAKLUL2517n5AJJAq48H4UG28o 5ZbXzmxzQ8NhSgSW4QEbOryxnt1jTXI2Fz902Cc1SGof4S7AgwXfqnUItwkMjeYY B/DcXT9Tb9A5MJ3ba/qVm9FUq9/oWVh1YR0H9Wo2oPw6fiBrhiLkHKjwCbjFTRUw k9eweslVNq+Ji7oXH5Jd2HYBS+KMdiNr94LWfaqxuX9x73pl1/xUCsvA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=/NF8x8VcIlH/gSMn7upSldrSBKEteM6M0u7HlLN88 ms=; b=A/AT1H/nGn2wTkEIZEybthbqfHum41R8sJ0opJrI5pR82xzXfI61T35S8 zYaZmW9DAhaafBMeXQ1NQWlAF4y/ZWEF9Cptq6F7LMcinQxmXSWM0rQrTCFwVbba Jid3HCWoY+5Tu9KfshEYukgg5pZ089O6BqIovY6o9fDPAankXwalKs8B4t2xv5vd fTfqpHYyNqi7pWGPzXWSYO8wpc9UXeuzG7Aks4pOoWVgemo2pyiZtZGFyGXg4+1Y vqiQtp6sJ8RAF6clSGS3leKgsgXi8kPKKR4kuLByK2LbMbRU2UF9CGdWIKlqw/YZ yWj7RMCGnf2vwRFb+mBeFg7P9Z1uA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvvddrleelgddthecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufhffjgfkfgggtgfgsehtqhertddtreejnecuhfhrohhmpeeuvghnucfu thhurhhmfhgvlhhsuceosggvnhesshhtuhhrmhdrtghomhdrrghuqeenucggtffrrghtth gvrhhnpeegtedttedutddvvefgueffueeghfeigfeukeeufeeltdefleetuedtiedvkeeg keenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegsvg hnsehsthhurhhmrdgtohhmrdgruh X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sun, 27 Feb 2022 18:07:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from Marseille (localhost.lan [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id c80309fc; Sun, 27 Feb 2022 23:07:26 +0000 (UTC) From: Ben Sturmfels To: Augusto Stoffel Subject: Re: bug#49073: 28.0.50; python-send-to-repl functions misbehave References: <1aed416d4a4c84b688a893c1832a7ae076f10ffb.camel@gmail.com> <87h78mfs3p.fsf@sturm.com.au> <87ilt1iok4.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2022 10:07:26 +1100 In-Reply-To: <87ilt1iok4.fsf@gmail.com> (Augusto Stoffel's message of "Sat, 26 Feb 2022 17:24:11 +0100") Message-ID: <877d9fx61d.fsf@sturm.com.au> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 49073 Cc: 49073@debbugs.gnu.org, dalanicolai@gmail.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) On Sat, 26 Feb 2022, Augusto Stoffel wrote: > As to the second point mentioned in the original message of this bug > (=E2=80=9Cfor various setups, even the output does not get printed proper= ly=E2=80=9D), I > can't observe this, so a minimal recipe to reproduce would be > appreciated. I believe this second point is the same as closed bug #29592. It's fixed in 28.0.91 but wasn't fixed in 28.0.50. Regards, Ben From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Feb 28 04:10:21 2022 Received: (at 49073) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Feb 2022 09:10:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59989 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nOc2v-0002KR-ES for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 28 Feb 2022 04:10:21 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:34260) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nOc2t-0002K7-Ff for 49073@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 28 Feb 2022 04:10:20 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID :In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=hhGlfFREF9MSoxsXaS7z2hmSuD9Ac/pbKa6Ohy5K6Pg=; b=kbaz5meZt9ZeTbYenHTKJkje4N Gk0wWyuvy6AIxXx6YO0lkfrMQoaRwdYufgw6FLWGcnQ6utCO/MLH3LLtZYJpZwVkI3jqiXccE6QLq l3L3yAkLy6Rnz8mFVl4ENBXz6l9UX6MLJS3j34Uyn4X0rFwugkRSxFiIgFInThiqmg9Q=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=giant) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nOc2j-0005aQ-Bc; Mon, 28 Feb 2022 10:10:12 +0100 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Ben Sturmfels Subject: Re: bug#49073: 28.0.50; python-send-to-repl functions misbehave References: <1aed416d4a4c84b688a893c1832a7ae076f10ffb.camel@gmail.com> <87h78mfs3p.fsf@sturm.com.au> <87ilt1iok4.fsf@gmail.com> <877d9fx61d.fsf@sturm.com.au> X-Now-Playing: Stoneman Family's _Anthology of American Folk Music: Songs (1)_: "The Spanish Merchant's Daughter" Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2022 10:10:08 +0100 In-Reply-To: <877d9fx61d.fsf@sturm.com.au> (Ben Sturmfels's message of "Mon, 28 Feb 2022 10:07:26 +1100") Message-ID: <87a6ebs6fj.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Ben Sturmfels writes: >> As to the second point mentioned in the original message of this bug >> (“for various setups, even the output does not get printed properly”), I >> can't observe this, so a minimal recipe to re [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 49073 Cc: 49073@debbugs.gnu.org, dalanicolai@gmail.com, Augusto Stoffel X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Ben Sturmfels writes: >> As to the second point mentioned in the original message of this bug >> (=E2=80=9Cfor various setups, even the output does not get printed prope= rly=E2=80=9D), I >> can't observe this, so a minimal recipe to reproduce would be >> appreciated. > > I believe this second point is the same as closed bug #29592. It's fixed > in 28.0.91 but wasn't fixed in 28.0.50. And skimming this bug report, it looks like the first point was fixed earlier? So I'm closing this bug report. If I misunderstood, please respond to the debbugs address and we'll reopen. --=20 (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Feb 28 04:10:26 2022 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Feb 2022 09:10:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59992 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nOc30-0002Ki-Ks for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 28 Feb 2022 04:10:26 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:34276) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nOc2z-0002KK-B6 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 28 Feb 2022 04:10:25 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=JWe77bx+Lo9u4FHlcfUn6OsFYepNnPgsn60w3C5f338=; b=Ms5gPf7XrmnTN3k5PLE1er+q+c 5pER8/xf0EEZ5w53m5nBIffq2/5kKNQGXbLe7nGVokmYiMNz3NX0vO7ibQ952jxl8udtz9nRGRB3n V6Xr91Gz4pgMMVdv3dI82jeZlUFye3+VSPsVfDhb5BAb517bwgXtS7xLUsz5eBkmqvDo=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=giant) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nOc2q-0005ac-Pg for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 28 Feb 2022 10:10:19 +0100 Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2022 10:10:16 +0100 Message-Id: <878rtvs6fb.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #49073 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 49073 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) close 49073 quit From unknown Tue Aug 19 09:31:54 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2022 11:24:09 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator