GNU bug report logs - #48841
fido-mode is slower than ido-mode with similar settings

Previous Next

Full log

Message #326 received at 48841 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru>
To: João Távora <joaotavora <at> gmail.com>,
 Daniel Mendler <mail <at> daniel-mendler.de>
Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>,
 Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>, 48841 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
 47711 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#47711: bug#48841: bug#47711: [PATCH VERSION 2] Add new
 `completion-filter-completions` API and deferred highlighting
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 17:26:44 +0300

On 16.08.2021 14:37, João Távora wrote:
> I am not a native English speaker, and maybe you don't understand
> my language.  Another way to explain what I am talking  is to talk about
> "bug reproduction".  You say there's a bug in my patch, I am asking you
> for a "bug reproduction recipe" as defined by most,  if not all, the results
> you get by searching "bug reproduction recipe" in the Google search engine.

I hope you, or at least other here, can someday see and understand that 
asking to prove standard engineering practices from the first 
principles, time and time again in various discussions, is not a way to 
encourage good atmosphere or promote project participation.

Are you really not imagine a buggy scenario coming from a combination of 
downstream uses of 'completion-score' property, different completion 
styles (some setting it, and some not), and a completion table that 
either uses global string values outright, or caches them for the 
duration of the current command?

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.