GNU bug report logs - #48841
fido-mode is slower than ido-mode with similar settings

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: João Távora <joaotavora <at> gmail.com>
Cc: mail <at> daniel-mendler.de, 47711 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca, 48841 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, dgutov <at> yandex.ru
Subject: bug#48841: bug#47711: [PATCH VERSION 2] Add new `completion-filter-completions` API and deferred highlighting
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 15:19:17 +0300

> From: João Távora <joaotavora <at> gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 13:02:04 +0100
> Cc: Daniel Mendler <mail <at> daniel-mendler.de>, Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru>, 
> 	Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>, 48841 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, 47711 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 12:57 PM Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> wrote:
> 
> > I was talking about the infrastructure that produces the completion
> > candidates, not about the application that uses them.  My point is
> > that your approach requires the applications using the candidates to
> > copy them, whereas previously they could use them without copying.
> 
> If it helps, I think that that is true of all alternatives presented
> so far

Yes, I know.  I was comparing the proposed alternatives to what we
have now, and specifically because Dmitry mentioned this aspect.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.