GNU bug report logs - #48841
fido-mode is slower than ido-mode with similar settings

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: João Távora <joaotavora <at> gmail.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: Daniel Mendler <mail <at> daniel-mendler.de>, 47711 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>, 48841 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru>
Subject: bug#48841: bug#47711: [PATCH VERSION 2] Add new `completion-filter-completions` API and deferred highlighting
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 13:02:04 +0100

On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 12:57 PM Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> wrote:

> I was talking about the infrastructure that produces the completion
> candidates, not about the application that uses them.  My point is
> that your approach requires the applications using the candidates to
> copy them, whereas previously they could use them without copying.

If it helps, I think that that is true of all alternatives presented
so far (though I haven't read the big patch fully yet). The difference is
that the consumers who copy the candidate strings will only copy a much
smaller number, typically only the ones that need to be displayed.
Whereas currently, all candidate strings are copied, displayed or not.

João Távora

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.