GNU bug report logs - #48825
[PATCH] gnu: Simplify the use of --with-long-double-128 on powerpc64le.

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Chris Marusich <cmmarusich <at> gmail.com>
Subject: bug#48825: closed (Re: bug#48825: [PATCH] gnu: Simplify the use
 of --with-long-double-128 on powerpc64le.)
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 03:48:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your bug report

#48825: [PATCH] gnu: Simplify the use of --with-long-double-128 on powerpc64le.

which was filed against the guix-patches package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 48825 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
48825: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=48825
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Chris Marusich <cmmarusich <at> gmail.com>
To: 48825-close <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#48825: [PATCH] gnu: Simplify the use of
 --with-long-double-128 on powerpc64le.
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 20:47:24 -0700

[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]

Committed in 45dd2b4505095d24e253bd62d74474cad135cf3b.

-- 
Chris

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Chris Marusich <cmmarusich <at> gmail.com>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Cc: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Simplify the use of --with-long-double-128 on
 powerpc64le.
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2021 22:08:00 -0700

[Message part 6 (text/plain, inline)]

Hi,

Currently in Guix, we explicitly specify --with-long-double-128 on
powerpc64le-linux (and potentially other powerpc64-* systems) in two
places.  It turns out that this is not necessary.  This patch simplifies
our code.

I originally authored this in order to try fixing bug 47698, but it
didn't solve that problem, and it turns out the --with-long-double-128
option is probably unrelated to that bug.  However, it's still worth
making this change to simplify our code.

If nobody has any issues with this, then in 2 weeks I will commit it.
One question is: where should I commit it?  I'd like to commit it to
master, but it causes many rebuilds on powerpc64le-linux (it does not
cause rebuilds on any other platforms), so per the guidelines ((guix)
Submitting Patches) I ought to commit it to core-updates.  However,
because the glibc upgrade from 2.31 to 2.32 on core-updates causes many
problems for powerpc64le-linux, core-updates has never once been a
viable branch for powerpc64le-linux in the time since support was first
added on master.  So if I commit this patch to core-updates, it won't
really do anyone any good right now.  With all this in mind, I think
master is the right place to commit this patch.

-- 
Chris

[0001-gnu-Simplify-the-use-of-with-long-double-128-on-powe.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.