From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jun 03 20:30:09 2021 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jun 2021 00:30:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45041 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1loxix-00027n-Rd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jun 2021 20:30:08 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:36720) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1loxPi-0001ek-AM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jun 2021 20:10:14 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51490) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1loxPi-0003Ne-5e for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jun 2021 20:10:14 -0400 Received: from mail-40132.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.132]:45096) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1loxPe-0007ca-0a for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jun 2021 20:10:13 -0400 Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2021 00:09:55 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail; t=1622765406; bh=tZfAShax/rJLRtOxdc0/x0ppyvnyIxYDtJ6pezDj3uQ=; h=Date:To:From:Reply-To:Subject:From; b=O26BUhPweNU59+lNk1S6976fo+lpM6JqtNolIXIAMA/+0JyEb0KJS5+UxZitzt4Yz w4ApGKBH2swxDFicugaOglMqVFewZ8HxzBc4EH96sYAnp0yDhFsoAlGhn7POyX3si1 8mXKLZOD/BRbD7OgvvAQXdSAB3mMZc99gYjv4VHc= To: "bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org" From: feodor-sverdlov Subject: outline-minor-mode and comment outline headings Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="b1_uWnVrN5pG0hVEwxYKGYMqxWHomYMELZ7RO1ewWLV3tc" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on mailout.protonmail.ch Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.70.40.132; envelope-from=feodor-sverdlov@protonmail.com; helo=mail-40132.protonmail.ch X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 03 Jun 2021 20:30:07 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: feodor-sverdlov Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --b1_uWnVrN5pG0hVEwxYKGYMqxWHomYMELZ7RO1ewWLV3tc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 SSBoYXZlIG5vdGljZWQgdGhhdCBjb21tZW50IHR5cGUgc3ViLWhlYWRpbmdzIGdldCBoaWdobGln aHRlZCB3aXRoIGEgZGlmZmVyZW50IGNvbG91ciBvbmx5IHdoZW4KIm91dGxpbmUtbWlub3ItbW9k ZS1oaWdobGlnaHQiIGlzIHNldCB0byAib3ZlcnJpZGUiLiBCdXQgdGhlbiB0aGUgY29kZSBoZWFk aW5ncyBkbyBub3Qga2VlcCB0aGUKY29kZSBoaWdobGlnaHRpbmcuIFRoZW4gaWYgeW91IHB1dCAi b3V0bGluZS1taW5vci1tb2RlLWhpZ2hsaWdodCIgdG8gImFwcGVuZCIsIHNvIHRoYXQgdGhhdCBj b2RlCnJldGFpbnMgdGhlIGNvZGUgaGlnaGxpZ2h0aW5nLCB0aGUgc3ViLWhlYWRpbmdzIGxldmVs cyB3aWxsIHVzZSBhIHNpbmdsZSBoaWdobGlnaHRpbmcgY29sb3VyLgoKVGhpcyBvdXRsaW5lIGhp Z2hsaWdodGluZyBpbXBsZW1lbnRhdGlvbiBpbiAib3V0bGluZS5lbCIgaGFzIG5vdCBiZWVuIHZl cnkgd2VsbCB0aG91Z2h0IHRocm91Z2guCkNvZGUgaGlnaGxpZ2h0aW5nIHNob3VsZCBiZSByZXRh aW5lZCwgd2hpbHN0IGNvbW1lbnQgdHlwZSBoaWdobGlnaHRpbmcgc2hvdWxkIHVzZSBhIGRpZmZl cmVudCBjb2xvdXIKYWNjb3JkaW5nIHRvIHRoZSBoZWFkaW5nIGxldmVsLg== --b1_uWnVrN5pG0hVEwxYKGYMqxWHomYMELZ7RO1ewWLV3tc Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 PGRpdj5JIGhhdmUgbm90aWNlZCB0aGF0IGNvbW1lbnQgdHlwZSBzdWItaGVhZGluZ3MgZ2V0IGhp Z2hsaWdodGVkIHdpdGggYSBkaWZmZXJlbnQgY29sb3VyIG9ubHkgd2hlbiZuYnNwOyA8YnI+PC9k aXY+PGRpdj4ib3V0bGluZS1taW5vci1tb2RlLWhpZ2hsaWdodCIgaXMgc2V0IHRvICJvdmVycmlk ZSIuJm5ic3A7IEJ1dCB0aGVuIHRoZSBjb2RlIGhlYWRpbmdzIGRvIG5vdCBrZWVwIHRoZSA8YnI+ PC9kaXY+PGRpdj5jb2RlIGhpZ2hsaWdodGluZy4mbmJzcDsgVGhlbiBpZiB5b3UgcHV0ICJvdXRs aW5lLW1pbm9yLW1vZGUtaGlnaGxpZ2h0IiB0byAiYXBwZW5kIiwgc28gdGhhdCB0aGF0Jm5ic3A7 IGNvZGU8YnI+PC9kaXY+PGRpdj5yZXRhaW5zIHRoZSBjb2RlIGhpZ2hsaWdodGluZywgdGhlIHN1 Yi1oZWFkaW5ncyBsZXZlbHMgd2lsbCB1c2UgYSBzaW5nbGUgaGlnaGxpZ2h0aW5nIGNvbG91ci48 YnI+PC9kaXY+PGRpdj48YnI+PC9kaXY+PGRpdj5UaGlzIG91dGxpbmUgaGlnaGxpZ2h0aW5nIGlt cGxlbWVudGF0aW9uIGluICJvdXRsaW5lLmVsIiBoYXMgbm90IGJlZW4gdmVyeSB3ZWxsIHRob3Vn aHQgdGhyb3VnaC4gPGJyPjwvZGl2PjxkaXY+Q29kZSBoaWdobGlnaHRpbmcgc2hvdWxkIGJlIHJl dGFpbmVkLCB3aGlsc3QgY29tbWVudCB0eXBlIGhpZ2hsaWdodGluZyBzaG91bGQgdXNlIGEgZGlm ZmVyZW50IGNvbG91cjxicj48L2Rpdj48ZGl2PmFjY29yZGluZyB0byB0aGUgaGVhZGluZyBsZXZl bC48YnI+PC9kaXY+PGRpdiBjbGFzcz0icHJvdG9ubWFpbF9zaWduYXR1cmVfYmxvY2siPjxkaXYg Y2xhc3M9InByb3Rvbm1haWxfc2lnbmF0dXJlX2Jsb2NrLXVzZXIgcHJvdG9ubWFpbF9zaWduYXR1 cmVfYmxvY2stZW1wdHkiPjxicj48L2Rpdj48ZGl2IGNsYXNzPSJwcm90b25tYWlsX3NpZ25hdHVy ZV9ibG9jay1wcm90b24iPjxicj48L2Rpdj48L2Rpdj48ZGl2Pjxicj48L2Rpdj4= --b1_uWnVrN5pG0hVEwxYKGYMqxWHomYMELZ7RO1ewWLV3tc-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jun 04 05:58:45 2021 Received: (at 48823) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jun 2021 09:58:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45427 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lp6bB-00022j-2v for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jun 2021 05:58:45 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:32776) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lp6b4-00022P-Vx for 48823@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jun 2021 05:58:39 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=/XR0wYmcdkG10C7AiQ0sVy+0IFYNTpmJOaRXXbmtlos=; b=DW+aOASak0dNOTPz32Z0CA/6Zx XI9LyaolCHecnsqULEXQUzeTfU/NY6g2lVoLv+DRvaX62JNcN2j9r347unh6RH2WPdJ5HhRRI7uH1 69gYjwEwt8reiaKhkfjRMIe6iKguOiLDt+edFZwdqeRp6R0P9QJ+y+3rfBdWunre4XiM=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lp6av-00047D-0w; Fri, 04 Jun 2021 11:58:29 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: feodor-sverdlov Subject: Re: bug#48823: outline-minor-mode and comment outline headings References: X-Now-Playing: Cocteau Twins's _Make More Noise (3)_: "Speak No Evil" Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2021 11:58:24 +0200 In-Reply-To: (feodor-sverdlov@protonmail.com's message of "Fri, 04 Jun 2021 00:09:55 +0000") Message-ID: <87lf7qymrj.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: feodor-sverdlov writes: > I have noticed that comment type sub-headings get highlighted with a > different colour only when "outline-minor-mode-highlight" is set to > "override". Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: feodor-sverdlov writes: > I have noticed that comment type sub-headings get highlighted with a > different colour only when "outline-minor-mode-highlight" is set to > "override". Content analysis details: (1.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [95.216.78.240 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 2.0 PDS_TONAME_EQ_TOLOCAL_SHORT Short body with To: name matches everything in local email X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48823 Cc: 48823@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) feodor-sverdlov writes: > I have noticed that comment type sub-headings get highlighted with a > different colour only when "outline-minor-mode-highlight" is set to > "override". You've also asked this on the help mailing list. Please don't spam the various Emacs facilities with the same questions. Closing. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jun 04 05:58:55 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jun 2021 09:58:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45430 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lp6bL-00023G-Hn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jun 2021 05:58:55 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:32792) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lp6bG-00022k-AJ for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jun 2021 05:58:50 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=isxzNs3a+kSjGe8MpThvl1TV6J3O6B8GQ/KASLUUlxk=; b=egkjG/p95SWRD0x1p/j2FjIqL7 aAZ0Pz+vrvpwO9Bmx1w88GjYh4R2/spiu09nf2asjN1uEftRZB+yrgbHQ3rfUN6yZxykw4QRKW72p LbjpjRtGQ91W9ru+f9sbOvLc/V0K3ehu/u1j25DlAfji+fGQEKIBqapogrbiYY+Q+IaI=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lp6b8-00047L-PO for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jun 2021 11:58:40 +0200 Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2021 11:58:38 +0200 Message-Id: <87k0naymr5.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #48823 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 48823 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) close 48823 quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Jun 04 12:40:27 2021 Received: (at 48823) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Jun 2021 16:40:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47823 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lpCry-0003Oz-QF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jun 2021 12:40:26 -0400 Received: from relay10.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.230]:43755) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lpCrt-0003O1-Lg for 48823@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jun 2021 12:40:22 -0400 Received: (Authenticated sender: juri@linkov.net) by relay10.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4B405240003; Fri, 4 Jun 2021 16:40:13 +0000 (UTC) From: Juri Linkov To: feodor-sverdlov Subject: Re: bug#48823: outline-minor-mode and comment outline headings Organization: LINKOV.NET References: Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2021 19:31:52 +0300 In-Reply-To: (feodor-sverdlov via's message of "Fri, 04 Jun 2021 00:09:55 +0000") Message-ID: <87bl8l7frb.fsf@mail.linkov.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 48823 Cc: 48823@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) > I have noticed that comment type sub-headings get highlighted with a > different colour only when > "outline-minor-mode-highlight" is set to "override". But then the code > headings do not keep the > code highlighting. Then if you put "outline-minor-mode-highlight" to > "append", so that that code > retains the code highlighting, the sub-headings levels will use a single > highlighting colour. > > This outline highlighting implementation in "outline.el" has not been very > well thought through. > Code highlighting should be retained, whilst comment type highlighting > should use a different colour > according to the heading level. I already suggested the solution for you in bug#48724, please try it. From unknown Thu Jun 19 14:03:15 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sat, 03 Jul 2021 11:24:05 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator