GNU bug report logs -
#48702
[PATCH 0/3] Add patatt and update b4
Previous Next
Reported by: Kyle Meyer <kyle <at> kyleam.com>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 14:52:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
Message #71 received at 48702 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Xinglu Chen writes:
> Both packages build fine for me; b4 works as expected;
Thanks for testing.
> I haven’t gotten around to setup patatt yet, but ‘patatt --help’ works
> fine.
I haven't tested the sender's side of things (e.g., running `patatt
sign'), but I've tried out the receiving end:
* move into a clone of the patatt repo in order to make uses of its
existing .keys/ subdirectory
* pull in a message from https://lore.kernel.org for one of these keys
One example:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ tree --charset=ascii .keys/openpgp
.keys/openpgp
|-- chromium.org
| `-- keescook
| `-- default
`-- linuxfoundation.org
`-- konstantin
`-- default
4 directories, 2 files
$ b4 am 20211215232432.2069605-1-keescook <at> chromium.org
Looking up https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211215232432.2069605-1-keescook%40chromium.org
Grabbing thread from lore.kernel.org/all/20211215232432.2069605-1-keescook%40chromium.org/t.mbox.gz
Analyzing 3 messages in the thread
Checking attestation on all messages, may take a moment...
---
✓ [PATCH] iommu: Use correctly sized arguments for bit field
+ Acked-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov <at> gmail.com> (✓ DKIM/gmail.com)
---
✓ Signed: openpgp/keescook <at> chromium.org
✓ Signed: DKIM/chromium.org
---
Total patches: 1
---
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211215232432.2069605-1-keescook <at> chromium.org
Base: not specified
git am ./20211215_keescook_iommu_use_correctly_sized_arguments_for_bit_field.mbx
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
If the same `b4 am' command is invoked without those keys in place, I
instead see
✗ No key: openpgp/keescook <at> chromium.org
✓ Signed: DKIM/chromium.org
So, things seem to be wired up okay. (The `b4 --debug am' output for
the same command looks okay too.)
> I also took the opportunity to test the ‘guix review’ command that
> I have started to work on. :-)
Neat, thanks for the sneak peek.
This bug report was last modified 3 years and 2 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.