GNU bug report logs - #48696
[PATCH 0/3] Documenting commit reverts and revocation

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Subject: bug#48696: closed (Re: bug#48696: [PATCH 0/3] Documenting commit
 reverts and revocation)
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 12:39:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your bug report

#48696: [PATCH 0/3] Documenting commit reverts and revocation

which was filed against the guix-patches package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 48696 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
48696: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=48696
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: 48696-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#48696: [PATCH 0/3] Documenting commit reverts and revocation
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 14:37:54 +0200

Hi!

Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> skribis:

> If there are no objections, I’d like to push within a couple of
> days.

[...]

>   doc: Structure the "Commit Access" section.
>   doc: Add "Addressing Issues" section.
>   doc: Explain more reasons for commit revocation.
>   doc: Clarify Git commit signing; fix typo.

Pushed as b5b9266e409abb18970bd34557cf087eb29fa713.

Thanks Chris and everyone for your feedback!

Ludo’.

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Cc: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] Documenting commit reverts and revocation
Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 14:32:59 +0200

Hello Guix!

Attached is an attempt to:

  1. Structure the “Commit Access” section of the manual;

  2. Document how to address committers’ mistakes, when to revert
     commits;

  3. Explain under what circumstances maintainers may revoke commit
     rights.

It essentially codifies unwritten rules, but as always, I think it’s
better to be explicit about the rules and community expectations.

Let me know what you think!  I propose to leave a comment period
of at least one week, possibly iterating with new versions.

Ludo’.

Ludovic Courtès (3):
  doc: Structure the "Commit Access" section.
  doc: Add "Addressing Mistakes" section.
  doc: Explain more reasons for commit revocation.

 doc/contributing.texi | 114 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 93 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

-- 
2.31.1

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.