GNU bug report logs - #48667
[PATCH] doc: Expound on how to specify the version of a package.

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Xinglu Chen <public <at> yoctocell.xyz>

Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 09:01:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #26 received at 48667 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos <at> telenet.be>
To: Xinglu Chen <public <at> yoctocell.xyz>, 48667 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [bug#48667] [PATCH] doc: Add reference for
 ‘git-ver
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2021 11:48:25 +0200
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Xinglu Chen schreef op zo 06-06-2021 om 11:19 [+0200]:
> +@deffn {Scheme Procedure} git-version @var{VERSION} @var{REVISION} @var{COMMIT}
> +Return the version string for packages using @code{git-fetch}.
> +
> +@lisp
> +(git-version "0.2.3" "0" "93818c936ee7e2f1ba1b315578bde363a7d43d05")
> +@result{} "0.2.3-0.93818c9"
> +@end lisp
> +@end deffn
> +
> +@deffn {Scheme Procedure} hg-version @var{VERSION} @var{REVISION} @var{CHANGESET}
> +Return the version string for packages using @code{hg-fetch}.  It works
> +in the same was @code{git-version}
> +@end deffn

Linguistic nitpick: about ‘It works in the same was @code{git-version}’: ‘in the same was’
seems ungrammatical to me. Should this have been something like

   It works in the same way as @code{git-version}.

? (Remember to include the period.)

LGTM otherwise.

Greetings,
Maxime.
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 3 years and 349 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.